PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the validity of preeclampsia, congenital cardiac malformations, and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) diagnoses in the US Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), a nationwide health care utilization database that may be useful for perinatal research. METHODS: Using the 2000-2007 MAX, we identified more than 1 million pregnancies ending in live birth. We identified potential cases based on claims, reviewed their hospital medical records, and calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using records as the reference. RESULTS: Among 183 women with any preeclampsia diagnoses, the PPV was 66.5% (53.6, 77.4%), but it increased to 94.5% (84.0, 98.3%) for inpatient preeclampsia diagnoses. The PPV for inpatient PPHN diagnoses (N = 82) was 68.3% (57.6, 77.4%), but it increased to 89.6% (CI: 77.8, 95.5%) when restricting to infants not transferred to another facility shortly after birth (N = 48). The PPV for cardiac malformations was 77.6% (65.7, 86.2%) when requiring inpatient codes on more than one date (N = 63). CONCLUSIONS: These PPVs are conservative, particularly when patients were transferred or received outpatient diagnoses, because we reviewed records from a single hospitalization only. PPVs improve with stringent identification criteria, at the cost of sensitivity, and can be used to correct for measurement error.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the validity of preeclampsia, congenital cardiac malformations, and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) diagnoses in the US Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), a nationwide health care utilization database that may be useful for perinatal research. METHODS: Using the 2000-2007 MAX, we identified more than 1 million pregnancies ending in live birth. We identified potential cases based on claims, reviewed their hospital medical records, and calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using records as the reference. RESULTS: Among 183 women with any preeclampsia diagnoses, the PPV was 66.5% (53.6, 77.4%), but it increased to 94.5% (84.0, 98.3%) for inpatient preeclampsia diagnoses. The PPV for inpatient PPHN diagnoses (N = 82) was 68.3% (57.6, 77.4%), but it increased to 89.6% (CI: 77.8, 95.5%) when restricting to infants not transferred to another facility shortly after birth (N = 48). The PPV for cardiac malformations was 77.6% (65.7, 86.2%) when requiring inpatient codes on more than one date (N = 63). CONCLUSIONS: These PPVs are conservative, particularly when patients were transferred or received outpatient diagnoses, because we reviewed records from a single hospitalization only. PPVs improve with stringent identification criteria, at the cost of sensitivity, and can be used to correct for measurement error.
Authors: Shagufta Yasmeen; Patrick S Romano; Michael E Schembri; Janet M Keyzer; William M Gilbert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kristin Palmsten; Krista F Huybrechts; Karin B Michels; Paige L Williams; Helen Mogun; Soko Setoguchi; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Cristin P Freeman; Rajat Deo; Craig Newcomb; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom; Warren B Bilker Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Kristin Palmsten; Krista F Huybrechts; Helen Mogun; Mary K Kowal; Paige L Williams; Karin B Michels; Soko Setoguchi; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristin Palmsten; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Krista F Huybrechts; Paige L Williams; Karin B Michels; Eric D Achtyes; Helen Mogun; Soko Setoguchi Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-08-21
Authors: Brian T Bateman; Krista F Huybrechts; Michael A Fischer; Ellen W Seely; Jeffrey L Ecker; Anna S Oberg; Jessica M Franklin; Helen Mogun; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Anthony Wemakor; Karen Casson; Ester Garne; Marian Bakker; Marie-Claude Addor; Larraitz Arriola; Miriam Gatt; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsoyr; Vera Nelen; Mary O'Mahoney; Anna Pierini; Anke Rissmann; David Tucker; Breidge Boyle; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg; Helen Dolk Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Elisabetta Patorno; Krista F Huybrechts; Brian T Bateman; Jacqueline M Cohen; Rishi J Desai; Helen Mogun; Lee S Cohen; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathryn Rough; Jenny W Sun; George R Seage; Paige L Williams; Krista F Huybrechts; Brian T Bateman; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Gloria Too; Timothy Wen; Amelia K Boehme; Eliza C Miller; Lisa R Leffert; Frank J Attenello; William J Mack; Mary E DʼAlton; Alexander M Friedman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 7.661