| Literature DB >> 31326965 |
Naiara Cinegaglia1, Luiza Antoniazzi2, Daniela Rosa3, Debora Miranda3, Julio Acosta-Navarro2, Luiz Bortolotto2, Valeria Hong2, Valeria Sandrim1.
Abstract
Telomere length is considered to be a biomarker of biological aging and age-related disease. There are few studies that have evaluated the association between telomere length and diet, and none of them have evaluated the impact of a vegetarian diet on telomere length and its correlation with cardiovascular biomarkers in apparently healthy subjects. Therefore, our objectives were to evaluate leukocyte telomere length (LTL) in vegetarians and omnivorous subjects and its association with classical cardiovascular risk biomarkers. From the total of 745 participants initially recruited, 44 omnivorous and 44 vegetarian men apparently healthy were selected for this study and LTL was measured in 39 omnivorous and 41 vegetarians by Real-Time Quantitative PCR reaction. Although telomere length was not different between omnivorous and vegetarians, we found a strong negative correlation between LTL and IMT (intima-media thickness) in omnivorous, but not in vegetarian group. In addition, omnivorous who were classified with short telomere length had higher carotid IMT compared to vegetarians. Our data suggest that telomere length can be a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis in the omnivorous group.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular; carotid intima-media thickness; telomere length; vegetarian
Year: 2019 PMID: 31326965 PMCID: PMC6682516 DOI: 10.18632/aging.102098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Clinical parameters of omnivorous and vegetarians subjects.
| 47.0 ± 1.50 | 45.15 ± 1.23 | 0.341 | |
| 27.67 ± 0.76 | 23.31 ± 0.46 | < 0.0001*** | |
| 128.8 ± 2.44 | 119.8 ± 1.67 | 0.003** | |
| 83.51 ± 1.62 | 76.32 ± 1.31 | 0.0009** | |
| 200.7 ± 5.58 | 181.6 ± 6.43 | 0.029* | |
| 45.28 ± 1.80 | 47.88 ± 1.47 | 0.265 | |
| 127.1 ± 5.28 | 111.0 ± 5.29 | 0.034* | |
| 155.5 ± 5.82 | 133.9 ± 6.91 | 0.020* | |
| 141.8 ± 10.16 | 114.2 ± 11.62 | 0.078 | |
| 1.007 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.04 | 0.048* | |
| 3.12 ± 1.06 | 1.80 ± 0.52 | 0.065 | |
| 5.56 ± 0.07 | 5.29 ± 0.04 | 0.002** | |
| 103.3 ± 2.16 | 94.88 ± 1.17 | 0.0009*** | |
| 668.2 ± 21.12 | 593.2 ± 14.81 | 0.004** | |
| 101.0 ± 5.63 | 111.2 ± 7.25 | 0.277 |
Abbreviations: BMI – body mass index; SBP – systolic blood pressure; DBP – diastolic blood pressure; TC - total cholesterol; HDL – high density lipoproteins; LDL – low density lipoproteins; non-HDL - non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG – triyglycerides; ApoB – apolipoprotein; CRP – high sensitivity c-reactive protein; HbA1c - Glycated Hemoglobin; IMT - intima-media thickness; LTL – Leukocyte telomere length.
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared to omnivorous group.
Correlation between telomere length versus clinical and biochemical parameters.
| -0.13 | 0.218 | -0.26 | 0.1 | -0.06 | 0.703 | |
| -0.12 | 0.275 | -0.09 | 0.57 | -0.19 | 0.232 | |
| -0.24 | 0.028** | -0.28 | 0.08 | -0.17 | 0.278 | |
| -0.25 | 0.024** | -0.31 | 0.05 | -0.17 | 0.272 | |
| -0.31 | 0.004** | -0.26 | 0.10 | -0.31 | 0.045* | |
| 0.17 | 0.118 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 0.24 | 0.122 | |
| -0.30 | 0.005** | -0.23 | 0.14 | -0.26 | 0.096 | |
| -0.32 | 0.002** | -0.25 | 0.12 | -0.34 | 0.027* | |
| -0.19 | 0.080 | -0.09 | 0.54 | -0.20 | 0.191 | |
| -0.24 | 0.031* | -0.3 | 0.05 | -0.16 | 0.295 | |
| 0.007 | 0.949 | -0.15 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.260 | |
| -0.08 | 0.436 | -0.13 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.751 | |
| -0.15 | 0.162 | -0.09 | 0.58 | -0.04 | 0.793 | |
| -0.27 | 0.014* | -0.38 | 0.01* | -0.02 | 0.859 | |
Significant at *P<0.05, **P<0.01
Abbreviations: BMI – body mass index; SBP – systolic blood pressure; DBP – diastolic blood pressure; TC - total cholesterol; HDL – high density lipoproteins; LDL – low density lipoproteins; non-HDL - non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG – triyglycerides; ApoB – apolipoprotein; CRP – c-reactive protein; HbA1c - Glycated Hemoglobin; IMT - intima-media thickness.
Multivariate relationships.
| β | β | β | ||||
| -0.06 | 0.172 | -0.16 | 0.018* | -0.01 | 0.870 | |
| -0.10 | 0.867 | 0.20 | 0.786 | -0.39 | 0.703 | |
| -0.58 | 0.681 | 2.59 | 0.155 | 0.31 | 0.918 | |
| -0.27 | 0.492 | -0.13 | 0.776 | -0.13 | 0.872 | |
| 7.0 | 0.641 | 1.48 | 0.930 | 19.10 | 0.534 | |
| -0.26 | 0.046* | -0.13 | 0.428 | -0.35 | 0.110 | |
Dependent variable: telomere length (TL). Significant at *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: IMT - intima-media thickness; BMI – body mass index; SBP – systolic blood pressure; HbA1c - Glycated Hemoglobin; TC - total cholesterol; β- standardized regression coefficients, obtained from multiple linear regression analysis regression models.
Figure 1Carotid IMT level in relation to short and long telomere length. Data are presented as median and standard error. Omnivorous with short telomere length had higher carotid IMT compared to vegetarians. Significant at *P<0.05 compared to omnivorous with short LTL (ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, GraphPad Prism software).