| Literature DB >> 34862440 |
Ai Kido1, Tadamichi Akagi2,3, Hanako Ohashi Ikeda1, Takanori Kameda1, Kenji Suda1, Masahiro Miyake1, Tomoko Hasegawa1, Shogo Numa1, Akitaka Tsujikawa1.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a new technique for non-invasive imaging of blood vessels, allowing combined evaluation of both deep and surface vessels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post-trabeculectomy longitudinal changes in complete avascular area (CAA) of filtering blebs using anterior segment (AS-) OCTA and their association with surgical outcomes. This study included 57 eyes of 53 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. AS-OCTA images of filtering bleb were acquired at 3 and 6 months after trabeculectomy, and at 1 month in possible cases. CAAs, regions where complete blood flow was not depicted in AS-OCTA images, were evaluated for their presence, extent, and change over time. CAAs were detected in 37 eyes (65%) and 33 eyes (58%) at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, respectively. The extent of CAAs reduced over time after surgery in most cases. No parameters related to CAAs were significantly associated with surgical success (i.e., intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 12 mmHg and IOP reduction > 20% without medication). In conclusion, although it is difficult to predict surgical success by CAA itself, AS-OCTA may be useful for the objective evaluation of the vascularity of filtering blebs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34862440 PMCID: PMC8642474 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02871-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Patient characteristics.
| Variables | Total | Successful | Unsuccessful | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 57 | N = 36 | N = 21 | ||
| Age (years) | 65.2 ± 13.2 | 66.6 ± 11.6 | 62.9 ± 15.5 | 0.57* |
| Sex (male/female) | 34/23 | 23/13 | 11/10 | 0.27** |
| Spherical equivalents (diopters) | − 3.32 ± 3.77 | − 2.76 ± 3.46 | − 4.30 ± 4.16 | 0.16* |
| Axial length (mm) | 25.12 ± 1.73 | 24.96 ± 1.73 | 25.40 ± 1.75 | 0.27* |
| Central corneal thickness (μm) | 524.5 ± 38.2 | 513.7 ± 28.1 | 543.3 ± 46.5 | 0.01* |
| Visual field, mean deviation (dB) | − 17.67 ± 6.18 | − 17.81 ± 5.83 | − 17.44 ± 6.87 | 0.89* |
| Preoperative IOP (mmHg) | 22.1 ± 8.4 | 21.94 ± 7.56 | 22.33 ± 9.86 | 0.78* |
| Preoperative eyedrops score | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 4.1 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 0.26* |
| Diagnosis (POAG/PACG, secondary) | 38/19 | 24/12 | 14/7 | 0.99** |
| Operation method (TLE one/ TLE combined with cataract surgery) | 45/12 | 28/8 | 17/4 | 0.99** |
| Postoperative IOP (mmHg) | 11.1 ± 2.9 | 9.6 ± 2.1 | 13.6 ± 2.4 | < 0.001* |
| Topical anti-glaucoma medication | 16% (9/57) | 0% (0/36) | 43% (9/21) | < 0.001** |
| Needling | 9% (5/57) | 6% (2/36) | 14% (3/21) | 0.35** |
| 1 month after TLE | 78% (28/36) | 74% (17/23) | 85% (11/13) | 0.68** |
| 3 months after TLE | 65% (37/57) | 67% (24/36) | 62% (13/21) | 0.78** |
| 6 months after TLE | 58% (33/57) | 58% (21/36) | 57% (12/21) | 0.99** |
| 1 month after TLE | 15.58 ± 12.22 | 14.38 ± 11.29 | 17.70 ± 13.95 | 0.62* |
| 3 months after TLE | 10.10 ± 10.71 | 11.31 ± 11.33 | 8.01 ± 9.44 | 0.34* |
| 6 months after TLE | 8.23 ± 11.32 | 9.83 ± 13.26 | 5.51 ± 6.23 | 0.29* |
| Change of CAA (%)b | − 1.87 ± 7.47 | − 1.49 ± 8.06 | − 2.50 ± 6.46 | 0.93* |
CAA complete avascular area, IOP intraocular pressure, POAG primary open-angle glaucoma, PACG primary angle closure glaucoma, TLE trabeculectomy.
The following statistical tests are conducted to examine differences between the successful and unsuccessful groups: *Wilcoxon rank sum test; **Chi-square test.
aThe complete avascular area is measured in pixels, divided by 1,048,576 (1024 × 1024) pixels which is the entire imaging area, and converted to percentage.
bThe change in complete avascular area is calculated by subtracting the extent of the complete avascular area after 3 months from that after 6 months.
Figure 1Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography assessment of complete avascular area (CAA) in the filtering bleb. (a) 3 × 3 mm AS-OCTA images are taken at the center of the filtering bleb, with the scleral flap and its nasal and temporal sides scanned in the same manner. (b) The extent of CAA (%) is calculated by dividing CAA in pixels by the total number of pixels (1,048,576 = 1024 × 1024 pixels).
Figure 2A typical case in which the complete avascular area (CAA) is reduced over time. Cross-sectional OCTA images overlying the B-scan images (upper), AS-OCTA en face images (middle), and slit-lamp microscopy photographs (bottom) at 1 (a), 3 (b), and 6 (c) months postoperatively. CAAs detected in the AS-OCTA are identical to the avascular area observed in the slit-lamp microscopy. The CAA decreases in size postoperatively.
Figure 3A case with discrepancy between AS-OCTA and slit-lamp microscopy findings. Cross-sectional OCTA images overlying the B-scan images (upper), AS-OCTA en face images (middle), and slit-lamp microscopy photographs (bottom) at 1 (a), 3 (b), and 6 (c) months postoperatively. The complete avascular area (CAA) decreases as time passes. A marked CAA is observed in the AS-OCTA image at 1 month after surgery (a, middle), but meandering blood vessel-like structures exist in the slit-lamp microscopy photograph (a, bottom, white arrowheads).
Association between surgical success and complete avascular area (CAA).
| Variables | Unadjusted Risk Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted Risk Ratio (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month after TLE | 0.52 (0.07–2.72) | 0.46 | 0.37 (0.04–2.45) | 0.33* |
| 3 months after TLE | 1.23 (0.39–3.78) | 0.72 | 1.10 (0.33–3.57) | 0.88* |
| 6 months after TLE | 1.05 (0.35–3.12) | 0.93 | 0.95 (0.29–2.99) | 0.93* |
| 1 month after TLE | 0.98 (0.92–1.03) | 0.43 | 0.97 (0.91–1.04) | 0.40* |
| 3 months after TLE | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.26 | 1.03 (0.97–1.09) | 0.32* |
| 6 months after TLE | 1.06 (0.99–1.13) | 0.17 | 1.05 (0.99–1.14) | 0.21* |
| Change of CAA | 1.02 (0.95–1.10) | 0.62 | 1.02 (0.94–1.10) | 0.64* |
*Multivariable analysis is performed with surgical success as the objective variable, in which each of the items related to CAA (presence, extent, and change) is adjusted for age, operation method, and preoperative IOP.
Figure 4Procedure of trabeculectomy. Intraoperative images of trabeculectomy in this study (a–c) and a schema of the incision sites (d). A fornix-based conjunctival flap with small radial incision (a), a 3 × 3 mm half-layer square scleral flap formation (b), and suturing of the scleral flap and conjunctiva using 10–0 nylon (c) are performed. (d) Schema of the operative field.