Literature DB >> 31322799

Data-driven self-calibration and reconstruction for non-cartesian wave-encoded single-shot fast spin echo using deep learning.

Feiyu Chen1, Joseph Y Cheng2, Valentina Taviani3, Vipul R Sheth2, Ryan L Brunsing2, John M Pauly1, Shreyas S Vasanawala2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current self-calibration and reconstruction methods for wave-encoded single-shot fast spin echo imaging (SSFSE) requires long computational time, especially when high accuracy is needed.
PURPOSE: To develop and investigate the clinical feasibility of data-driven self-calibration and reconstruction of wave-encoded SSFSE imaging for computation time reduction and quality improvement. STUDY TYPE: Prospective controlled clinical trial.
SUBJECTS: With Institutional Review Board approval, the proposed method was assessed on 29 consecutive adult patients (18 males, 11 females, range, 24-77 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A wave-encoded variable-density SSFSE sequence was developed for clinical 3.0T abdominal scans to enable 3.5× acceleration with full-Fourier acquisitions. Data-driven calibration of wave-encoding point-spread function (PSF) was developed using a trained deep neural network. Data-driven reconstruction was developed with another set of neural networks based on the calibrated wave-encoding PSF. Training of the calibration and reconstruction networks was performed on 15,783 2D wave-encoded SSFSE abdominal images. ASSESSMENT: Image quality of the proposed data-driven approach was compared independently and blindly with a conventional approach using iterative self-calibration and reconstruction with parallel imaging and compressed sensing by three radiologists on a scale from -2 to 2 for noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and confidence. Computation time of these two approaches was also compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare image quality and two-tailed t-tests were used to compare computation time with P values of under 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: An average 2.1-fold speedup in computation was achieved using the proposed method. The proposed data-driven self-calibration and reconstruction approach significantly reduced the perceived noise level (mean scores 0.82, P < 0.0001). DATA
CONCLUSION: The proposed data-driven calibration and reconstruction achieved twice faster computation with reduced perceived noise, providing a fast and robust self-calibration and reconstruction for clinical abdominal SSFSE imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:841-853.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data-driven; deep learning; parallel imaging and compressed sensing; single-shot fast spin echo; wave encoding

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31322799      PMCID: PMC8018814          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  21 in total

1.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  128-channel body MRI with a flexible high-density receiver-coil array.

Authors:  Christopher J Hardy; Randy O Giaquinto; Joseph E Piel; Kenneth W Rohling; Luca Marinelli; Daniel J Blezek; Eric W Fiveland; Robert D Darrow; Thomas K F Foo
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  HASTE MR imaging: description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen.

Authors:  R C Semelka; N L Kelekis; D Thomasson; M A Brown; G A Laub
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Autocalibrated wave-CAIPI reconstruction; Joint optimization of k-space trajectory and parallel imaging reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Cauley; Kawin Setsompop; Berkin Bilgic; Himanshu Bhat; Borjan Gagoski; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Learned Primal-Dual Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonas Adler; Ozan Oktem
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Autocalibrating motion-corrected wave-encoding for highly accelerated free-breathing abdominal MRI.

Authors:  Feiyu Chen; Tao Zhang; Joseph Y Cheng; Xinwei Shi; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Authors:  Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Compressed Sensing: From Research to Clinical Practice with Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Christopher M Sandino; Joseph Y Cheng; Feiyu Chen; Morteza Mardani; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 12.551

9.  Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo.

Authors:  Reed F Busse; Anja C S Brau; Anthony Vu; Charles R Michelich; Ersin Bayram; Richard Kijowski; Scott B Reeder; Howard A Rowley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Variable-Density Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction by Using Variational Networks.

Authors:  Feiyu Chen; Valentina Taviani; Itzik Malkiel; Joseph Y Cheng; Jonathan I Tamir; Jamil Shaikh; Stephanie T Chang; Christopher J Hardy; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Accelerated single-shot T2-weighted fat-suppressed (FS) MRI of the liver with deep learning-based image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison of image quality with conventional T2-weighted FS sequence.

Authors:  Krishna Shanbhogue; Angela Tong; Paul Smereka; Dominik Nickel; Simon Arberet; Rebecca Anthopolos; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Joint multi-contrast variational network reconstruction (jVN) with application to rapid 2D and 3D imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Polak; Stephen Cauley; Berkin Bilgic; Enhao Gong; Peter Bachert; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Kawin Setsompop
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Wasserstein GANs for MR Imaging: From Paired to Unpaired Training.

Authors:  Ke Lei; Morteza Mardani; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for MR Image Reconstruction: An Overview for Clinicians.

Authors:  Dana J Lin; Patricia M Johnson; Florian Knoll; Yvonne W Lui
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  RUN-UP: Accelerated multishot diffusion-weighted MRI reconstruction using an unrolled network with U-Net as priors.

Authors:  Yuxin Hu; Yunyingying Xu; Qiyuan Tian; Feiyu Chen; Xinwei Shi; Catherine J Moran; Bruce L Daniel; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Alternative approach of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: abbreviated MRI.

Authors:  Ryan L Brunsing; Kathryn J Fowler; Takeshi Yokoo; Guilherme Moura Cunha; Claude B Sirlin; Robert M Marks
Journal:  Hepatoma Res       Date:  2020-09-01

7.  Free-breathing Accelerated Cardiac MRI Using Deep Learning: Validation in Children and Young Adults.

Authors:  Evan J Zucker; Christopher M Sandino; Aya Kino; Peng Lai; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 29.146

8.  CINENet: deep learning-based 3D cardiac CINE MRI reconstruction with multi-coil complex-valued 4D spatio-temporal convolutions.

Authors:  Thomas Küstner; Niccolo Fuin; Kerstin Hammernik; Aurelien Bustin; Haikun Qi; Reza Hajhosseiny; Pier Giorgio Masci; Radhouene Neji; Daniel Rueckert; René M Botnar; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.