Literature DB >> 31316585

The biomechanics of proximal humeral fractures: Injury mechanism and cortical morphology.

Addie Majed1,2, Tanujan Thangarajah3, Dominic Fl Southgate2, Peter Reilly1, Anthony Bull2, Roger Emery1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of arm position on proximal humerus fracture configuration and to determine whether cortical thinning would predispose to fracture propagation and more complex patterns of injury.
METHODS: A drop test rig was designed to simulate falls onto an outstretched arm ('parachute reflex'). Thirty-one cadaveric specimens underwent computer tomography scanning and cortical thicknesses mapping. Humeri were fractured according to one of the two injury mechanisms and filmed using a high-speed camera. Anatomical descriptions of the injuries were made. Areas of thinning were measured and correlated with zones of fracture propagation.
RESULTS: Direct impact simulation resulted in undisplaced humeral head split fractures in 53% of cases, with the remainder involving disruption to the articular margin and valgus impaction. Alternatively, the 'parachute reflex' predominantly produced shield-type injuries (38%) and displaced greater tuberosity fractures (19%). A strong correlation was demonstrated between cortical thinning and the occurrence of fracture (odds ratio = 7.766, 95% confidence interval from 4.760 to 12.669, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: This study has shown that arm position during a fall influences fracture configuration of the proximal humerus. Correlating fracture pattern and mechanism of injury will allow more appropriate fracture reduction techniques to be devised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical modelling; fracture patterns; proximal humeral fracture

Year:  2018        PMID: 31316585      PMCID: PMC6620795          DOI: 10.1177/1758573218768535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  12 in total

1.  Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Alex N Knight; Todd C Pitts; Peter J O'Rourke; Wayne Z Burkhead
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  A model for the prediction of the forces at the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  I W Charlton; G R Johnson
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Adequacy of laboratory simulation of in-line skater falls.

Authors:  John Lubahn; Richard Englund; Gerardo Trinidad; John Lyons; David Ivance; Frank L Buczek
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Quality of life and functional outcome after a 2-part proximal humeral fracture: a prospective cohort study on 50 patients treated with a locking plate.

Authors:  Per Olerud; Leif Ahrengart; Anita Söderqvist; Jenny Saving; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Rehabilitation after two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus.

Authors:  S A Hodgson; S J Mawson; D Stanley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-04

6.  Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Amar Rangan; Helen Handoll; Stephen Brealey; Laura Jefferson; Ada Keding; Belen Corbacho Martin; Lorna Goodchild; Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Catherine Hewitt; David Torgerson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007.

Authors:  Pekka Kannus; Mika Palvanen; Seppo Niemi; Harri Sievänen; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Mechanism of injury and morphology of the greater tuberosity fracture.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Erich Lingenfelter; Franziska Fischer; Eduard M Walters; Michael Schnabel
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  A three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  G Edelson; I Kelly; F Vigder; N D Reis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

10.  Ultimate fracture load of cadaver proximal humeri correlates more strongly with mean combined cortical thickness than with areal cortical index, DEXA density, or canal-to-calcar ratio.

Authors:  J G Skedros; C S Mears; W Z Burkhead
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  4 in total

1.  Influence of rotator cuff preload on fracture configuration in proximal humerus fractures: a proof of concept for fracture simulation.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Stephanie Kahmann; Mehdi Behbahani; Lenhard Pennig; Michael Hackl; Tim Leschinger; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Injuries from falls by older adults in long-term care captured on video: Prevalence of impacts and injuries to body parts.

Authors:  Vicki Komisar; Aleksandra Dojnov; Yijian Yang; Nataliya Shishov; Helen Chong; Ying Yu; Ian Bercovitz; Michael D Cusimano; Clemens Becker; Dawn C Mackey; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.070

3.  The Reliability and Reproducibility of a New Revised Edelson Classification.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Weichong Dong; Yali Zhou; Meishuang Shang; Sifan Yang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Menopause-related cortical loss of the humeral head region mainly occurred in the greater tuberosity.

Authors:  Yeming Wang; Jian Li; Yutao Men; Wanfu Wei
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.055

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.