Literature DB >> 26218571

Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density.

John G Skedros1,2, Alex N Knight2, Todd C Pitts2,3, Peter J O'Rourke4, Wayne Z Burkhead5.   

Abstract

Methods are needed for identifying poorer quality cadaver proximal humeri to ensure that they are not disproportionately segregated into experimental groups for fracture studies. We hypothesized that measurements made from radiographs of cadaveric proximal humeri are stronger predictors of fracture strength than chronological age or bone density values derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Thirty-three proximal humeri (range: 39-78 years) were analyzed for: (1) bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm(2)) using DXA, (2) bulk density (g/cm(3)) using DXA and volume displacement, (3) regional bone density in millimeters of aluminum (mmAl) using radiographs, and (4) regional mean (medial+lateral) cortical thickness and cortical index (CI) using radiographs. The bones were then fractured simulating a fall. Strongest correlations with ultimate fracture load (UFL) were: mean cortical thickness at two diaphyseal locations (r = 0.71; p < 0.001), and mean mmAl in the humeral head (r = 0.70; p < 0.001). Weaker correlations were found between UFL and DXA-BMD (r = 0.60), bulk density (r = 0.43), CI (r = 0.61), and age (r = -0.65) (p values <0.01). Analyses between UFL and the product of any two characteristics showed six combinations with r-values >0.80, but none included DXA-derived density, CI, or age. Radiographic morphometric and densitometric measurements from radiographs are therefore stronger predictors of UFL than age, CI, or DXA-derived density measurements.
© 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; densitometry; fracture; morphometry; proximal humerus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26218571     DOI: 10.1002/jor.22994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  Adaptation of the proximal humerus to physical activity: A within-subject controlled study in baseball players.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Keith G Avin; Mariana E Kersh; Robyn K Fuchs; Roland Krug; Ryan J Bice
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The biomechanics of proximal humeral fractures: Injury mechanism and cortical morphology.

Authors:  Addie Majed; Tanujan Thangarajah; Dominic Fl Southgate; Peter Reilly; Anthony Bull; Roger Emery
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-04-26

3.  Cortical bone thickness predicts the quantitative bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Shuang G Yan; Christoph Schopf; Christoph Ihle; Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Christoph M Sprecher
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Ultimate fracture load of cadaver proximal humeri correlates more strongly with mean combined cortical thickness than with areal cortical index, DEXA density, or canal-to-calcar ratio.

Authors:  J G Skedros; C S Mears; W Z Burkhead
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  The Circle-Fit Method Helps Make Reliable Cortical Thickness Measurements Regardless of Humeral Length.

Authors:  Trevor J Shelton; Amy E Steele; Augustine M Saiz; Kent N Bachus; John G Skedros
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-12-26

6.  Cortical parameters predict bone strength at the tibial diaphysis, but are underestimated by HR-pQCT and μCT compared to histomorphometry.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Stefan Milz; Damiano Schiuma; Robert G Richards; Markus Windolf; Christoph M Sprecher
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.610

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.