Literature DB >> 35579703

Influence of rotator cuff preload on fracture configuration in proximal humerus fractures: a proof of concept for fracture simulation.

Maximilian Lenz1, Stephanie Kahmann2, Mehdi Behbahani3, Lenhard Pennig4, Michael Hackl2, Tim Leschinger2, Lars Peter Müller2, Kilian Wegmann2,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In regard of surgical training, the reproducible simulation of life-like proximal humerus fractures in human cadaveric specimens is desirable. The aim of the present study was to develop a technique that allows simulation of realistic proximal humerus fractures and to analyse the influence of rotator cuff preload on the generated lesions in regards of fracture configuration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric specimens (6 left, 4 right) were fractured using a custom-made drop-test bench, in two groups. Five specimens were fractured without rotator cuff preload, while the other five were fractured with the tendons of the rotator cuff preloaded with 2 kg each. The humeral shaft and the shortened scapula were potted. The humerus was positioned at 90° of abduction and 10° of internal rotation to simulate a fall on the elevated arm. In two specimens of each group, the emergence of the fractures was documented with high-speed video imaging. Pre-fracture radiographs were taken to evaluate the deltoid-tuberosity index as a measure of bone density. Post-fracture X-rays and CT scans were performed to define the exact fracture configurations. Neer's classification was used to analyse the fractures.
RESULTS: In all ten cadaveric specimens life-like proximal humerus fractures were achieved. Two III-part and three IV-part fractures resulted in each group. The preloading of the rotator cuff muscles had no further influence on the fracture configuration. High-speed videos of the fracture simulation revealed identical fracture mechanisms for both groups. We observed a two-step fracture mechanism, with initial impaction of the head segment against the glenoid followed by fracturing of the head and the tuberosities and then with further impaction of the shaft against the acromion, which lead to separation of the tuberosities.
CONCLUSION: A high energetic axial impulse can reliably induce realistic proximal humerus fractures in cadaveric specimens. The preload of the rotator cuff muscles had no influence on initial fracture configuration. Therefore, fracture simulation in the proximal humerus is less elaborate. Using the presented technique, pre-fractured specimens are available for real-life surgical education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical simulation; Fracture configuration; Fracture simulation; Proximal humerus fracture; Rotator cuff; Surgical training

Year:  2022        PMID: 35579703     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04471-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  15 in total

1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients: impact on the level of independency, early function, and pain medication.

Authors:  Fabian Wolfensperger; Patrick Grüninger; Michael Dietrich; Mathias Völlink; Emanuel Benninger; Michel Schläppi; Christoph Meier
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Inducing life-like distal radius fractures in human cadaveric specimens: a tool for enhanced surgical training.

Authors:  Kilian Wegmann; Andreas Harbrecht; Michael Hackl; Stephan Uschok; Tim Leschinger; Lars P Müller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty: epidemiology, etiology, and surgical options.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Gauci; Maxime Cavalier; Jean-François Gonzalez; Nicolas Holzer; Toby Baring; Gilles Walch; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Biomechanical Analysis of Medial-Row All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Pair-Matched Cadaveric Model.

Authors:  Eamon D Bernardoni; Rachel M Frank; Shreya S Veera; Brian R Waterman; Justin W Griffin; Elizabeth F Shewman; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Nicola Kaestle; Emanuel Benninger; Jürgen Fornaro; Johannes Erhardt; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  G Edelson; I Kelly; F Vigder; N D Reis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of cable and suture cerclages for tuberosity reattachment in a 4-part proximal humeral fracture model treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominik Knierzinger; Christian H Heinrichs; Clemens Hengg; Marko Konschake; Franz Kralinger; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Advanced Surgical Trauma Care Course - Evaluation of a Fracture Simulation Course Concept with Intact Soft Tissue.

Authors:  Kilian Wegmann; Valentin Rausch; Klaus Josef Burkhart; Michael Hackl; Tim Leschinger; Lars Müller
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 0.923

9.  ORIF versus arthroplasty for open proximal humerus fractures: Nationwide Inpatient Sample data between 1998 and 2013.

Authors:  Anant Dixit; Frank S Cautela; Colin S Cooper; George A Beyer; James C Messina; Jeffrey E Mait; Neil V Shah; Bassel G Diebo; Carl B Paulino; William P Urban
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-22

10.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has higher perioperative implant complications and transfusion rates than total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mina Botros; Emily J Curry; Jonathan Yin; Andrew Jawa; Josef K Eichinger; Xinning Li
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.