| Literature DB >> 31312098 |
Kazuaki Okada1, Akira Sato1,2, Akiko Hiramoto1, Rena Isogawa1, Yuji Kurosaki3, Kazutaka Higaki4, Shin-Ichi Miyoshi5, Kyung-Soo Chang6, Hye-Sook Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the emergence and growing number of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum, a new drug for malaria control must be urgently developed. The new antimalarial synthetic compound N-251 was recently discovered. As an endoperoxide structure in the body, the compound shows high antimalarial activity and curative effects. We performed a pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of N-251 under various conditions using mice to understand the inhibitory effect of N-251 in parasite-infected mice.Entities:
Keywords: 6-(1,2,6,7-tetraoxaspiro [7.11] nonadec-4-yl)hexan-1-ol (N-251); Antimalarial medicine; Bioavailability (F); Pharmacokinetic (PK) study; Synthetic endoperoxide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31312098 PMCID: PMC6611044 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-019-0167-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1Structure of N-251 (a) and dose dependency of the pharmacokinetics of N-251 after intravenous in mice (b) and the correlation between dose and AUCi.v (c). Results were expressed as mean with the bar showing the SD value. The solid lines are theoretical lines obtained in the fitting study
Pharmacokinetic parameters of N-251 after intravenous administration in mice
| Dose (mg/kg) | Pharmacokinetic parameters | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUCiv (ng/mL·h) | CLtotal (L/h/kg) | Vd1 (L/kg) | Vd2 (L/kg) | Vdss (L/kg) | MRTiv (h) | ||||||
| 5 | 1161.50 | 4.30 | 1.33 | 3.23 | 1.62 | 4.85 | 1.12 | 1453.6 ± 465.9 | 1.62 ± 0.70 | 92.5 ± 182.0 | 0.35 ± 0.37 |
| 10 | 2433.64 | 4.11 | 2.60 | 1.58 | 2.35 | 3.93 | 0.96 | 5922.7 ± 1731.5 | 3.84 ± 1.23 | 410.0 ± 253.8 | 0.46 ± 0.15 |
| 25 | 7455.60 | 3.35 | 2.47 | 1.36 | 1.52 | 2.88 | 0.86 | 17,738.1 ± 1700.0 | 3.12 ± 0.55 | 690.4 ± 341.6 | 0.39 ± 0.10 |
Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the equations described in the “Methods” section. A, B, a, and b are hybrid parameters in the equation describing the plasma concentration-time profile after intravenous administration, and they were expressed as SD
Fig. 2Dose dependency of the pharmacokinetics of N-251 after oral administration in mice (a) and correlation between dose and AUCp.o (b). Results were expressed as mean with the bar showing the SD value. The solid lines are theoretical lines obtained in the fitting study
Pharmacokinetic parameters of N-251 after oral administration in mice
| Dose (mg/kg) | Pharmacokinetic parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUCpo (ng/mL·h) |
| MRTpo (h) | |||
| 30 | 633.67 ± 128.70 | 2 | 1574.04 | 0.2156 | 2.45 |
| 50 | 1363.67 ± 798.98 | 2 | 2566.96 | 0.2110 | 2.49 |
| 68 | 1677.33 ± 811.23 | 2 | 3768.25 | 0.2277 | 2.46 |
| 100 | 2456.17 ± 802.04 | 2 | 5886.16 | 0.2419 | 2.46 |
| 210 | 4890.00±1188.24 | 2 | 15241.40 | 0.2982 | 2.74 |
Cmax with SD and Tmax are observed values. The AUC and MRT were calculated from 0 to infinity using the trapezoidal rule. F was calculated utilizing the AUC value of 2433.64 ng/mL·h, after intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg
Fig. 3Effects of food and parasite infection on the absorption behavior of N-251. The dose of N-251 was 68 mg/kg. Results were expressed as mean with the bar showing the SD value
Effect of food and parasite infection on the oral absorption of N-251 in mice
| Conditions | Pharmacokinetic parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUCpo (ng/mL·h) |
| MRTpo (h) | |||
| Normal-fasted (control) | 1677.33 ± 811.23 | 2 | 3768.25 | 0.2277 | 2.46 |
| Infected-fasted | 1767.17 ± 1649.75 | 2 | 3273.35 | 0.1978 | 2.45 |
| Normal-fed | 952.50 ± 332.49 | 1.5 | 2282.17 | 0.1379 | 3.01 |
The Cmax with SD and Tmax were the observed values. AUC and MRT were calculated from 0 to infinity using the trapezoidal rule. F was calculated utilizing the AUC value of 2433.64 ng/mL·h after the intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg
Fig. 4Effect of multiple oral dosing on plasma concentration-time profile of N-251. A dose of 68 mg/kg of N-251 was orally administered every 8 h in normal-fed mice. Results were expressed as mean with the bar showing the SD value. The solid line was the simulation line calculated utilizing the equation shown in the “Methods” section as obtained in the fitting study for plasma concentration profile after a single oral administration