BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of operative case-time duration is critical for optimizing operating room use. Current estimates are inaccurate and earlier models include data not available at the time of scheduling. Our objective was to develop statistical models in a large retrospective data set to improve estimation of case-time duration relative to current standards. STUDY DESIGN: We developed models to predict case-time duration using linear regression and supervised machine learning. For each of these models, we generated an all-inclusive model, service-specific models, and surgeon-specific models. In the latter 2 approaches, individual models were created for each surgical service and surgeon, respectively. Our data set included 46,986 scheduled operations performed at a large academic medical center from January 2014 to December 2017, with 80% used for training and 20% for model testing/validation. Predictions derived from each model were compared with our institutional standard of using average historic procedure times and surgeon estimates. Models were evaluated based on accuracy, overage (case duration > predicted + 10%), underage (case duration < predicted - 10%), and the predictive capability of being within a 10% tolerance threshold. RESULTS: The machine learning algorithm resulted in the highest predictive capability. The surgeon-specific model was superior to the service-specific model, with higher accuracy, lower percentage of overage and underage, and higher percentage of cases within the 10% threshold. The ability to predict cases within 10% improved from 32% using our institutional standard to 39% with the machine learning surgeon-specific model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is a notable advancement toward statistical modeling of case-time duration across all surgical departments in a large tertiary medical center. Machine learning approaches can improve case duration estimations, enabling improved operating room scheduling, efficiency, and reduced costs.
BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of operative case-time duration is critical for optimizing operating room use. Current estimates are inaccurate and earlier models include data not available at the time of scheduling. Our objective was to develop statistical models in a large retrospective data set to improve estimation of case-time duration relative to current standards. STUDY DESIGN: We developed models to predict case-time duration using linear regression and supervised machine learning. For each of these models, we generated an all-inclusive model, service-specific models, and surgeon-specific models. In the latter 2 approaches, individual models were created for each surgical service and surgeon, respectively. Our data set included 46,986 scheduled operations performed at a large academic medical center from January 2014 to December 2017, with 80% used for training and 20% for model testing/validation. Predictions derived from each model were compared with our institutional standard of using average historic procedure times and surgeon estimates. Models were evaluated based on accuracy, overage (case duration > predicted + 10%), underage (case duration < predicted - 10%), and the predictive capability of being within a 10% tolerance threshold. RESULTS: The machine learning algorithm resulted in the highest predictive capability. The surgeon-specific model was superior to the service-specific model, with higher accuracy, lower percentage of overage and underage, and higher percentage of cases within the 10% threshold. The ability to predict cases within 10% improved from 32% using our institutional standard to 39% with the machine learning surgeon-specific model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is a notable advancement toward statistical modeling of case-time duration across all surgical departments in a large tertiary medical center. Machine learning approaches can improve case duration estimations, enabling improved operating room scheduling, efficiency, and reduced costs.
Authors: Elizabeth van Veen-Berkx; Sylvia G Elkhuizen; Sanne van Logten; Wolfgang F Buhre; Cor J Kalkman; Hein G Gooszen; Geert Kazemier Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Eric R Edelman; Sander M J van Kuijk; Ankie E W Hamaekers; Marcel J M de Korte; Godefridus G van Merode; Wolfgang F F A Buhre Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: York Jiao; Anshuman Sharma; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Thomas M Maddox; Thomas Kannampallil Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ingwon Yeo; Christian Klemt; Christopher M Melnic; Meghan H Pattavina; Bruna M Castro De Oliveira; Young-Min Kwon Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 2.928
Authors: Rodney A Gabriel; Bhavya Harjai; Sierra Simpson; Nicole Goldhaber; Brian P Curran; Ruth S Waterman Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 6.627
Authors: Sean Shao Wei Lam; Hamed Zaribafzadeh; Boon Yew Ang; Wendy Webster; Daniel Buckland; Christopher Mantyh; Hiang Khoon Tan Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-06-25