Literature DB >> 29490366

Understanding Costs of Care in the Operating Room.

Christopher P Childers1, Melinda Maggard-Gibbons1.   

Abstract

Importance: Increasing value requires improving quality or decreasing costs. In surgery, estimates for the cost of 1 minute of operating room (OR) time vary widely. No benchmark exists for the cost of OR time, nor has there been a comprehensive assessment of what contributes to OR cost.
Objectives: To calculate the cost of 1 minute of OR time, assess cost by setting and facility characteristics, and ascertain the proportion of costs that are direct and indirect. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis examined annual financial disclosure documents from all comparable short-term general and specialty care hospitals in California from fiscal year (FY) 2005 to FY2014 (N = 3044; FY2014, n = 302). The analysis focused on 2 revenue centers: (1) surgery and recovery and (2) ambulatory surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean cost of 1 minute of OR time, stratified by setting (inpatient vs ambulatory), teaching status, and hospital ownership. The proportion of cost attributable to indirect and direct expenses was identified; direct expenses were further divided into salary, benefits, supplies, and other direct expenses.
Results: In FY2014, a total of 175 of 302 facilities (57.9%) were not for profit, 78 (25.8%) were for profit, and 49 (16.2%) were government owned. Thirty facilities (9.9%) were teaching hospitals. The mean (SD) cost for 1 minute of OR time across California hospitals was $37.45 ($16.04) in the inpatient setting and $36.14 ($19.53) in the ambulatory setting (P = .65). There were no differences in mean expenditures when stratifying by ownership or teaching status except that teaching hospitals had lower mean (SD) expenditures than nonteaching hospitals in the inpatient setting ($29.88 [$9.06] vs $38.29 [$16.43]; P = .006). Direct expenses accounted for 54.6% of total expenses ($20.40 of $37.37) in the inpatient setting and 59.1% of total expenses ($20.90 of $35.39) in the ambulatory setting. Wages and benefits accounted for approximately two-thirds of direct expenses (inpatient, $14.00 of $20.40; ambulatory, $14.35 of $20.90), with nonbillable supplies accounting for less than 10% of total expenses (inpatient, $2.55 of $37.37; ambulatory, $3.33 of $35.39). From FY2005 to FY2014, expenses in the OR have increased faster than the consumer price index and medical consumer price index. Teaching hospitals had slower growth in costs than nonteaching hospitals. Over time, the proportion of expenses dedicated to indirect costs has increased, while the proportion attributable to salary and supplies has decreased. Conclusions and Relevance: The mean cost of OR time is $36 to $37 per minute, using financial data from California's short-term general and specialty hospitals in FY2014. These statewide data provide a generalizable benchmark for the value of OR time. Furthermore, understanding the composition of costs will allow those interested in value improvement to identify high-yield targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29490366      PMCID: PMC5875376          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  26 in total

1.  What does one minute of operating room time cost?

Authors:  Alex Macario
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Determining the True Cost to Deliver Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Over the Full Cycle of Care: Preparing for Bundling and Reference-Based Pricing.

Authors:  Anthony M DiGioia; Pamela K Greenhouse; Michelle L Giarrusso; Justina M Kress
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: use of the endoloop vs the endostapler.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lukish; David Powell; Steve Morrow; David Cruess; Phil Guzzetta
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-01

4.  Opportunity cost: a systematic application to surgery.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Michael J Payette; Christopher P Demas; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Extreme Markup: The Fifty US Hospitals With The Highest Charge-To-Cost Ratios.

Authors:  Ge Bai; Gerard F Anderson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Time-driven activity-based costing: a driver for provider engagement in costing activities and redesign initiatives.

Authors:  Nancy McLaughlin; Michael A Burke; Nisheeta P Setlur; Douglas R Niedzwiecki; Alan L Kaplan; Christopher Saigal; Aman Mahajan; Neil A Martin; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.

Authors:  Matthew Gitelis; Yalini Vigneswaran; Michael B Ujiki; Woody Denham; Mark Talamonti; Joseph P Muldoon; John G Linn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Surgical Episodes.

Authors:  Peter A Najjar; Matt Strickland; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Eric Muñoz; William Muñoz; Leslie Wise
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care.

Authors:  Michael J Guzman; Matthew E Gitelis; John G Linn; Michael B Ujiki; Matthew Waskerwitz; Konstantin Umanskiy; Joseph P Muldoon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  108 in total

1.  Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for benign colon polyps: a single institution cost analysis.

Authors:  Anusha Jayaram; Nathan Barr; Robert Plummer; Mengdi Yao; Lilian Chen; James Yoo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Minimally invasive resection of intracranial lesions using tubular retractors: a large, multi-surgeon, multi-institutional series.

Authors:  Daniel G Eichberg; Long Di; Ashish H Shah; Evan M Luther; Christina Jackson; Lina Marenco-Hillembrand; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Michael E Ivan; Robert M Starke; Ricardo J Komotar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Cystoscopy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications and Delayed Lower Genitourinary Tract Injury.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Rosa M Polan; Anna E Strohl; Matthew T Siedhoff; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Correlation of preoperative imaging characteristics with donor outcomes and operative difficulty in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Fides R Schwartz; Brian I Shaw; Reginald Lerebours; Federica Vernuccio; Francesca Rigiroli; Fernando Gonzalez; Sheng Luo; Aparna S Rege; Deepak Vikraman; Lynne Hurwitz-Koweek; Daniele Marin; Kadiyala Ravindra
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Comparison of Cost Center-Specific vs Hospital-wide Cost-to-Charge Ratios for Operating Room Services at Various Hospital Types.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Jill Q Dworsky; Marcia M Russell; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Assessment of the Versius surgical robotic system for dual-field synchronous transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a preclinical model: will tomorrow's surgical robots promise newfound options?

Authors:  S Atallah; E Parra-Davila; A G F Melani
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Evaluating Surgeons on Intraoperative Disposable Supply Costs: Details Matter.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Ira S Hofer; Drew S Cheng; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Viability testing of discarded livers with normothermic machine perfusion: Alleviating the organ shortage outweighs the cost.

Authors:  Siavash Raigani; Reinier J De Vries; Cailah Carroll; Ya-Wen Chen; David C Chang; Stuti G Shroff; Korkut Uygun; Heidi Yeh
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  PCNL in the prone position VS PCNL in the modified supine Double-S position: is there a better position? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giusti; Antonello De Lisa
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Patrick Mills; Richard Duszak; Jeffery A Weisman; Frank J Rybicki; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.