Jaideep J Pandit1, Aniket Tavare. 1. Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. jaideep.pandit@dpag.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is important that a surgical list is planned to utilise as much of the scheduled time as possible while not over-running, because this can lead to cancellation of operations. We wished to assess whether, theoretically, the known duration of individual operations could be used quantitatively to predict the likely duration of the operating list. METHODS: In a university hospital setting, we first assessed the extent to which the current ad-hoc method of operating list planning was able to match the scheduled operating list times for 153 consecutive historical lists. Using receiver operating curve analysis, we assessed the ability of an alternative method to predict operating list duration for the same operating lists. This method uses a simple formula: the sum of individual operation times and a pooled standard deviation of these times. We used the operating list duration estimated from this formula to generate a probability that the operating list would finish within its scheduled time. Finally, we applied the simple formula prospectively to 150 operating lists, 'shadowing' the current ad-hoc method, to confirm the predictive ability of the formula. RESULTS: The ad-hoc method was very poor at planning: 50% of historical operating lists were under-booked and 37% over-booked. In contrast, the simple formula predicted the correct outcome (under-run or over-run) for 76% of these operating lists. The calculated probability that a planned series of operations will over-run or under-run was found useful in developing an algorithm to adjust the planned cases optimally. In the prospective series, 65% of operating lists were over-booked and 10% were under-booked. The formula predicted the correct outcome for 84% of operating lists. CONCLUSION: A simple quantitative method of estimating operating list duration for a series of operations leads to an algorithm (readily created on an Excel spreadsheet, http://links.lww.com/EJA/A19) that can potentially improve operating list planning.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is important that a surgical list is planned to utilise as much of the scheduled time as possible while not over-running, because this can lead to cancellation of operations. We wished to assess whether, theoretically, the known duration of individual operations could be used quantitatively to predict the likely duration of the operating list. METHODS: In a university hospital setting, we first assessed the extent to which the current ad-hoc method of operating list planning was able to match the scheduled operating list times for 153 consecutive historical lists. Using receiver operating curve analysis, we assessed the ability of an alternative method to predict operating list duration for the same operating lists. This method uses a simple formula: the sum of individual operation times and a pooled standard deviation of these times. We used the operating list duration estimated from this formula to generate a probability that the operating list would finish within its scheduled time. Finally, we applied the simple formula prospectively to 150 operating lists, 'shadowing' the current ad-hoc method, to confirm the predictive ability of the formula. RESULTS: The ad-hoc method was very poor at planning: 50% of historical operating lists were under-booked and 37% over-booked. In contrast, the simple formula predicted the correct outcome (under-run or over-run) for 76% of these operating lists. The calculated probability that a planned series of operations will over-run or under-run was found useful in developing an algorithm to adjust the planned cases optimally. In the prospective series, 65% of operating lists were over-booked and 10% were under-booked. The formula predicted the correct outcome for 84% of operating lists. CONCLUSION: A simple quantitative method of estimating operating list duration for a series of operations leads to an algorithm (readily created on an Excel spreadsheet, http://links.lww.com/EJA/A19) that can potentially improve operating list planning.
Authors: Bradley N Doebbeling; Matthew M Burton; Eric A Wiebke; Spencer Miller; Laurence Baxter; Donald Miller; Jorge Alvarez; Joseph Pekny Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2012-11-03
Authors: Matthew A Bartek; Rajeev C Saxena; Stuart Solomon; Christine T Fong; Lakshmana D Behara; Ravitheja Venigandla; Kalyani Velagapudi; John D Lang; Bala G Nair Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Einar Hovlid; Oddbjørn Bukve; Kjell Haug; Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen; Christian von Plessen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rodney A Gabriel; Bhavya Harjai; Sierra Simpson; Nicole Goldhaber; Brian P Curran; Ruth S Waterman Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 6.627