| Literature DB >> 31308048 |
Simone Renner1,2, Ana Sofia Martins3, Elisabeth Streckel4, Christina Braun-Reichhart4, Mattias Backman5, Cornelia Prehn6, Nikolai Klymiuk4, Andrea Bähr4, Andreas Blutke7, Christina Landbrecht-Schessl4, Annegret Wünsch4, Barbara Kessler4, Mayuko Kurome4, Arne Hinrichs4, Sietse-Jan Koopmans8, Stefan Krebs5, Elisabeth Kemter4,2, Birgit Rathkolb4,2,9, Hiroshi Nagashima10, Helmut Blum5, Mathias Ritzmann11, Rüdiger Wanke12, Bernhard Aigner4, Jerzy Adamski6,13,14, Martin Hrabě de Angelis2,9,14,15, Eckhard Wolf4,2,5.
Abstract
Alongside the obesity epidemic, the prevalence of maternal diabetes is rising worldwide, and adverse effects on fetal development and metabolic disturbances in the offspring's later life have been described. To clarify whether metabolic programming effects are due to mild maternal hyperglycemia without confounding obesity, we investigated wild-type offspring of INS C93S transgenic pigs, which are a novel genetically modified large-animal model expressing mutant insulin (INS) C93S in pancreatic β-cells. This mutation results in impaired glucose tolerance, mild fasting hyperglycemia and insulin resistance during late pregnancy. Compared with offspring from wild-type sows, piglets from hyperglycemic mothers showed impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance: +3-fold in males; +4.4-fold in females) prior to colostrum uptake. Targeted metabolomics in the fasting and insulin-stimulated state revealed distinct alterations in the plasma metabolic profile of piglets from hyperglycemic mothers. They showed increased levels of acylcarnitines, gluconeogenic precursors such as alanine, phospholipids (in particular lyso-phosphatidylcholines) and α-aminoadipic acid, a potential biomarker for type 2 diabetes. These observations indicate that mild gestational hyperglycemia can cause impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance and associated metabolic alterations in neonatal offspring of a large-animal model born at a developmental maturation status comparable to human babies.Entities:
Keywords: Developmental programming; Maternal diabetes; Metabolomics; Pig; Transgenic
Year: 2019 PMID: 31308048 PMCID: PMC6737953 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.039156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Model Mech ISSN: 1754-8403 Impact factor: 5.758
Fig. 1.Generation of (A) Expression vector consisting of a 1.0 kb coding region of the porcine INS gene sequence including three exons with a T→A transition in exon 3 resulting in a Cys→Ser amino acid exchange at position 93, its essential regulatory elements and a neomycin selection cassette (neoR). (B) Quantification of INSC93S and wild-type INS transcripts in pancreatic tissue of INSC93S transgenic pigs by next-generation sequencing of RT-PCR amplicons. Founders 9748 and 9776 show at least 1.9-fold higher expression of the mutant INSC93S compared with the other three founders (F0) and similar expression to their F1 offspring (F1; n=3). Inset shows RT-PCR products of INSC93S/INS transcripts in pancreatic tissue of all INSC93S transgenic founders (left panel) and offspring from founder 9748 (9933, 9938, 9940) and founder 9776 (1035, 1037, 1043) (right panel). M, markers; gDNA, genomic DNA. (C,D) Intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) of INSC93S transgenic founder boars (9748, 50, 74, 76, 77) and age-matched controls at 8 months of age. (C) Glucose and (D) insulin levels. Data are means±s.e.m.
Fig. 2.Reduced glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in (A) Southern blot analysis of PvuII-digested genomic DNA from INSC93S transgenic pigs (1033, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1040, 1041, 1043) and littermate control animals (1032, 1034, 1038, 1039, 1042) using a [32P]CTP-labeled probe specific for the neomycin resistance cassette. Founder 9776 and its transgenic offspring show the same pattern, demonstrating a single integration site. (B,C) Intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) of offspring (male and female as effect was gender independent) from INSC93S transgenic founder boar 9776 and non-transgenic littermates at 3-4 months of age. (B) Glucose and (C) insulin levels. Data are means±s.e.m. (D) Quantitative-stereological analyses of pancreatic tissue from INSC93S transgenic pigs and non-transgenic littermates at 1 year of age. V (β-cell,Pan) is total β-cell volume in the pancreas. Images on the right are representative histological sections of pancreatic tissue stained with an α-insulin antibody from a control (WT) and an INSC93S transgenic pig (TG). Scale bars: 50 µm.
Fig. 3.Reduced insulin sensitivity and insufficient compensatory capacity to maintain glucose control in (A) Study outline of the evaluation of glucose control in sows during pregnancy and in neonates after birth. WT-NP, non-pregnant control; WT-P, pregnant control; TG-P, pregnant INSC93S transgenic; AI, artificial insemination; HIC, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp; MMGTT, mixed-meal glucose tolerance test; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test. (B,C) HIC of pregnant INSC93S transgenic (TG-P) and non-transgenic (WT-P) sows as well as of non-pregnant controls (WT-NP). (B) Glucose and insulin levels. (C) Glucose infusion rate (GIR). (D,E) MMGTT in TG-P, WT-P and WT-NP sows. (D) Glucose and (E) insulin concentrations. (F,G) Fasting blood glucose concentrations within the third trimester (time-point of the MMGTT) (F) and throughout pregnancy (G). Data are means±s.e.m.; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; different letters indicate significant difference between groups.
Fig. 4.Reduced glucose tolerance and increased insulin secretion in neonatal piglets born to (A,B) Oral glucose tolerance test in piglets prior to first colostrum uptake born to normoglycemic wild-type sows (NG) or to hyperglycemic INSC93S transgenic sows (HG). (A) Glucose, (B) insulin, (C) fasting insulin, (D) homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). (E-J) Clinical chemical parameters in NG and HG piglets in the fasting (0 min) and insulin-stimulated (120 min relative to an oral glucose load) state. (E) Lactate, (F) lipase, (G) glycerol, (H) NEFA, (I) cholesterol and (J) urea concentrations. (K,L) Significantly different abundance of metabolites in plasma samples of NG compared with HG piglets in the (K) fasting state and (L) insulin-stimulated (120 min relative to an oral glucose load) state. (K,L) Significantly different metabolites and metabolic indicators are shown as a percentage of the NG mean (blue striped line). The s.d. for each metabolite and genotype is indicated with error bars. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.