Enid Chung Roemer1, Karen B Kent, Amanda Mummert, Katherine McCleary, Jacquelyn B Palmer, Jason E Lang, Dyann M Matson Koffman, Ron Z Goetzel. 1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Roemer, Kent, McCleary, Dr Goetzel); IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Mummert, Palmer, Dr Goetzel); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion/Division of Population Health, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Lang); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Office of Science/Office of Science Quality, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Matson Koffman).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the updated 2019 CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard (CDC ScoreCard), which includes four new modules. METHODS: We pilot tested the updated instrument at 93 worksites, examining question response concurrence between two representatives from each worksite. We conducted cognitive interviews and site visits to evaluate face validity, and refined the instrument for public distribution. RESULTS: The mean question concurrence rate was 73.4%. Respondents reported the tool to be useful for assessing current workplace programs and planning future initiatives. On average, 43% of possible interventions included in the CDC ScoreCard were in place at the pilot sites. CONCLUSION: The updated CDC ScoreCard is a valid and reliable tool for assessing worksite health promotion policies, educational and lifestyle counseling programs, environmental supports, and health benefits.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the updated 2019 CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard (CDC ScoreCard), which includes four new modules. METHODS: We pilot tested the updated instrument at 93 worksites, examining question response concurrence between two representatives from each worksite. We conducted cognitive interviews and site visits to evaluate face validity, and refined the instrument for public distribution. RESULTS: The mean question concurrence rate was 73.4%. Respondents reported the tool to be useful for assessing current workplace programs and planning future initiatives. On average, 43% of possible interventions included in the CDC ScoreCard were in place at the pilot sites. CONCLUSION: The updated CDC ScoreCard is a valid and reliable tool for assessing worksite health promotion policies, educational and lifestyle counseling programs, environmental supports, and health benefits.
Authors: Rachel M Henke; Ginger S Carls; Meghan E Short; Xiaofei Pei; Shaohung Wang; Susan Moley; Mark Sullivan; Ron Z Goetzel Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ginger Smith Carls; Ron Z Goetzel; Rachel Mosher Henke; Jennifer Bruno; Fikry Isaac; Janice McHugh Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Enid Chung Roemer; Karen B Kent; Daniel K Samoly; Laura M Gaydos; Kristyn J Smith; Amol Agarwal; Dyann M Matson-Koffman; Ron Z Goetzel Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Mark R Rosekind; Kevin B Gregory; Melissa M Mallis; Summer L Brandt; Brian Seal; Debra Lerner Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Marco Túlio de Mello; Fernanda Veruska Narciso; Sergio Tufik; Teresa Paiva; David Warren Spence; Ahmed S Bahammam; Joris C Verster; Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal Journal: Int J Prev Med Date: 2013-03
Authors: Jason E Lang; Amanda Mummert; Enid Chung Roemer; Karen Butcher Kent; Dyann Matson Koffman; Ron Z Goetzel Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2020-03
Authors: Chris Calitz; Charlotte Pratt; Nicolaas P Pronk; Janet E Fulton; Kimberly Jinnett; Anne N Thorndike; Ebyan Addou; Ross Arena; Alison G M Brown; Chia-Chia Chang; Lisa Latts; Debra Lerner; Michiel Majors; Michelle Mancuso; Drew Mills; Eduardo Sanchez; David Goff Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Enid Chung Roemer; Karen B Kent; Ron Z Goetzel; John Krill; Farrah Spellman Williams; Jason E Lang Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.354