Rena C Patel1, Randy M Stalter, Katherine K Thomas, Bani Tamraz, Steven W Blue, David W Erikson, Christina J Kim, Edward J Kelly, Kavita Nanda, Athena P Kourtis, Jairam R Lingappa, Nelly Mugo, Jared M Baeten, Kimberly K Scarsi. 1. aDepartment of Medicine bDepartment of Global Health cDepartment of Epidemiology dDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington eDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California fEndocrine Technologies Core, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon gGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina hDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA iCenter for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya jDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of contraceptive implant progestin concentrations in HIV-positive women initiating efavirenz (EFV)-containing or nevirapine (NVP)-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART). DESIGN: We analyzed stored samples from women self-reporting implant use in the Partners PrEP Study. METHODS: Plasma samples collected every 6 months were analyzed for levonorgestrel and etonogestrel concentrations. Progestin concentrations from samples collected after ART initiation were compared with pre-ART concentrations for intraindividual comparisons. We used adjusted linear mixed models to compare hormone concentrations between individuals on EFV and NVP to a no ART group. We then evaluated whether possessing certain alleles with known or possible influences on EFV, NVP, or progestin metabolism were associated with changes in progestin concentrations or modified the association between ART use and progestin concentrations. RESULTS: Our analysis included 11 women who initiated EFV, 13 who initiated NVP, and 36 who remained ART-naive. In the EFV group, the adjusted geometric mean ratio (aGMR) of levonorgestrel was 0.39 [90% confidence intervals (0.31, 0.49); P < 0.001] and the etonogestrel aGMR was 0.51 (0.34, 0.76; P = 0.006) compared with the control group. No difference was observed in the NVP group compared with controls [levonorgestrel 0.93 (0.74, 1.18); P = 0.64; etonogestrel 1.07 (0.77, 1.50); P = 0.73]. Possession of four allele variants were found to result in further reductions in progestin concentrations among those receiving EFV. CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of EFV significantly reduces levonorgestrel or etonogestrel concentrations by 61 and 49%, respectively, compared with no ART use. We also report allelic variants in hepatic enzymes that influenced the extent of the observed drug-interaction between progestins and EFV.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of contraceptive implant progestin concentrations in HIV-positive women initiating efavirenz (EFV)-containing or nevirapine (NVP)-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART). DESIGN: We analyzed stored samples from women self-reporting implant use in the Partners PrEP Study. METHODS: Plasma samples collected every 6 months were analyzed for levonorgestrel and etonogestrel concentrations. Progestin concentrations from samples collected after ART initiation were compared with pre-ART concentrations for intraindividual comparisons. We used adjusted linear mixed models to compare hormone concentrations between individuals on EFV and NVP to a no ART group. We then evaluated whether possessing certain alleles with known or possible influences on EFV, NVP, or progestin metabolism were associated with changes in progestin concentrations or modified the association between ART use and progestin concentrations. RESULTS: Our analysis included 11 women who initiated EFV, 13 who initiated NVP, and 36 who remained ART-naive. In the EFV group, the adjusted geometric mean ratio (aGMR) of levonorgestrel was 0.39 [90% confidence intervals (0.31, 0.49); P < 0.001] and the etonogestrel aGMR was 0.51 (0.34, 0.76; P = 0.006) compared with the control group. No difference was observed in the NVP group compared with controls [levonorgestrel 0.93 (0.74, 1.18); P = 0.64; etonogestrel 1.07 (0.77, 1.50); P = 0.73]. Possession of four allele variants were found to result in further reductions in progestin concentrations among those receiving EFV. CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of EFV significantly reduces levonorgestrel or etonogestrel concentrations by 61 and 49%, respectively, compared with no ART use. We also report allelic variants in hepatic enzymes that influenced the extent of the observed drug-interaction between progestins and EFV.
Authors: Steven W Blue; Andrea J Winchell; Amy V Kaucher; Rachel A Lieberman; Christopher T Gilles; Maria N Pyra; Renee Heffron; Xuanlin Hou; Robert W Coombs; Kavita Nanda; Nicole L Davis; Athena P Kourtis; Joshua T Herbeck; Jared M Baeten; Jairam R Lingappa; David W Erikson Journal: Contraception Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Catherine A Chappell; Mohammed Lamorde; Shadia Nakalema; Beatrice A Chen; Hope Mackline; Sharon A Riddler; Susan E Cohn; Kristin M Darin; Sharon L Achilles; Kimberly K Scarsi Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-09-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: I Sivin; L Wan; S Ranta; F Alvarez; V Brache; D R Mishell; P Darney; A Biswas; S Diaz; O Kiriwat; M P Anant; C Klaisle; M Pavez; J Schechter Journal: Contraception Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew Mujugira; Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; Linda Barnes; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Lara Kidoguchi; Dana Panteleeff; Meighan Krows; Heena Shah; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Lisa Ondrejcek; Charlotte Ingram; Robert W Coombs; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kimberly K Scarsi; Kristin M Darin; Shadia Nakalema; David J Back; Pauline Byakika-Kibwika; Laura J Else; Sujan Dilly Penchala; Allan Buzibye; Susan E Cohn; Concepta Merry; Mohammed Lamorde Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Regis Kreitchmann; Alice Stek; Brookie M Best; Edmund Capparelli; JiaJia Wang; David Shapiro; Nahida Chakhtoura; Mark Mirochnick; Ahizechukwu C Eke Journal: Contraception Date: 2021-08-15 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Emily L Tuthill; Ann E Maltby; Belinda C Odhiambo; Eliud Akama; Jennifer A Pellowski; Craig R Cohen; Sheri D Weiser; Amy A Conroy Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-05-16
Authors: Jennifer H Tang; Nicole L Davis; Amanda H Corbett; Lameck Chinula; Mackenzie L Cottrell; Yasaman Zia; Gerald Tegha; Frank Z Stanczyk; Stacey Hurst; Mina C Hosseinipour; Lisa B Haddad; Athena P Kourtis Journal: Contracept X Date: 2020-05-29
Authors: Randy M Stalter; Gustavo Amorim; A Rain Mocello; Beatrice Jakait; Bryan E Shepherd; Beverly Musick; Caitlin Bernard; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Kara Wools-Kaloustian; Craig R Cohen; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Rena C Patel Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 6.707