Catherine A Chappell1, Mohammed Lamorde, Shadia Nakalema, Beatrice A Chen, Hope Mackline, Sharon A Riddler, Susan E Cohn, Kristin M Darin, Sharon L Achilles, Kimberly K Scarsi. 1. aDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh bMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA cInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda dDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania eDivision of Infectious Diseases, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois fDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel (ENG) released from a contraceptive implant in Ugandan women living with HIV who were receiving efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), compared with ART-naive women over 24 weeks. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, parallel-group study with three arms: ART-naive, NVP, or EFV-based ART (N = 20/group). METHODS: Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling of ENG, NVP, or EFV were performed at screening, entry, and then 1, 4, 12, and 24-week postimplant insertion. The primary endpoint was ENG concentrations at week 24, compared between the ART-naive group and each ART group, using geometric mean ratio (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Sixty participants competed the 24-week study and data from 58 participants are included; one participant each was excluded from the NVP group and EFV group because of a sample processing error and ART nonadherence, respectively. At week 24, geometric mean ENG was 362, 341, and 66 pg/ml in the ART-naive, NVP, and EFV groups, respectively [GMR: NVP : ART-naive 0.94 (0.90-1.01); EFV : ART-naive 0.18 (0.17-0.20)]. NVP and EFV concentrations were lower at week 24 compared to preimplant [NVP: geometric mean 5.7 versus 6.8 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.84 (0.83-0.85); EFV: geometric mean 3.6 versus 4.9 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.73 (0.69-0.80)]. CONCLUSION: After 24 weeks of combined use, ENG exposure was 82% lower in women using EFV-based ART compared with ART-naive women. In contrast, NVP did not significantly impact ENG exposure. These results raise concerns about reduced effectiveness of implantable contraception for women taking EFV-based ART.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel (ENG) released from a contraceptive implant in Ugandan women living with HIV who were receiving efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), compared with ART-naive women over 24 weeks. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, parallel-group study with three arms: ART-naive, NVP, or EFV-based ART (N = 20/group). METHODS: Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling of ENG, NVP, or EFV were performed at screening, entry, and then 1, 4, 12, and 24-week postimplant insertion. The primary endpoint was ENG concentrations at week 24, compared between the ART-naive group and each ART group, using geometric mean ratio (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Sixty participants competed the 24-week study and data from 58 participants are included; one participant each was excluded from the NVP group and EFV group because of a sample processing error and ART nonadherence, respectively. At week 24, geometric mean ENG was 362, 341, and 66 pg/ml in the ART-naive, NVP, and EFV groups, respectively [GMR: NVP : ART-naive 0.94 (0.90-1.01); EFV : ART-naive 0.18 (0.17-0.20)]. NVP and EFV concentrations were lower at week 24 compared to preimplant [NVP: geometric mean 5.7 versus 6.8 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.84 (0.83-0.85); EFV: geometric mean 3.6 versus 4.9 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.73 (0.69-0.80)]. CONCLUSION: After 24 weeks of combined use, ENG exposure was 82% lower in women using EFV-based ART compared with ART-naive women. In contrast, NVP did not significantly impact ENG exposure. These results raise concerns about reduced effectiveness of implantable contraception for women taking EFV-based ART.
Authors: S E Cohn; J-G Park; D H Watts; A Stek; J Hitti; P A Clax; S Yu; J J L Lertora Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-12-27 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Kimberly K Scarsi; Kristin M Darin; Catherine A Chappell; Stephanie M Nitz; Mohammed Lamorde Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: M Neary; M Lamorde; A Olagunju; K M Darin; C Merry; P Byakika-Kibwika; D J Back; M Siccardi; A Owen; K K Scarsi Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Chelsea B Polis; Sarah E K Bradley; Akinrinola Bankole; Tsuyoshi Onda; Trevor Croft; Susheela Singh Journal: Contraception Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Megan Neary; Catherine A Chappell; Kimberly K Scarsi; Shadia Nakalema; Joshua Matovu; Sharon L Achilles; Beatrice A Chen; Marco Siccardi; Andrew Owen; Mohammed Lamorde Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Owain Roberts; Rajith K R Rajoli; David J Back; Andrew Owen; Kristin M Darin; Courtney V Fletcher; Mohammed Lamorde; Kimberly K Scarsi; Marco Siccardi Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Lauren R Cirrincione; Sujan Dilly Penchala; Kimberly K Scarsi; Anthony T Podany; Lee C Winchester; David J Back; Saye H Khoo; Courtney V Fletcher; Marco Siccardi; Laura J Else Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Rena C Patel; Randy M Stalter; Katherine K Thomas; Bani Tamraz; Steven W Blue; David W Erikson; Christina J Kim; Edward J Kelly; Kavita Nanda; Athena P Kourtis; Jairam R Lingappa; Nelly Mugo; Jared M Baeten; Kimberly K Scarsi Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Junmei Zhang; Chenxiao Tang; Patrick J Oberly; Margaret B Minnigh; Sharon L Achilles; Samuel M Poloyac Journal: Contraception Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Kimberly K Scarsi; Yoninah S Cramer; Susan L Rosenkranz; Francesca Aweeka; Baiba Berzins; Robert W Coombs; Kristine Coughlin; Laura E Moran; Carmen D Zorrilla; Victor Akelo; Mariam Aziz; Ruth K Friedman; David Gingrich; Shobha Swaminathan; Catherine Godfrey; Susan E Cohn Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Sigcinile Dlamini; Michael Kuipa; Kim Enfield; Salndave Skosana; John G Woodland; Johnson Mosoko Moliki; Alexis J Bick; Zephne van der Spuy; Michelle F Maritz; Chanel Avenant; Janet P Hapgood Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 5.191