| Literature DB >> 31304162 |
Vanessa Ribeiro Dos Santos1, Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro2, Igor Conterato Gomes3, Jamile Sanches Codogno2, Lionai Lima Dos Santos2, Ismael Forte Freitas Júnior1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Analyzed the association of bone mass with the functional capacity of elderly aged 80 or more.Entities:
Keywords: Aged 80 and over; Bone density; Femur
Year: 2013 PMID: 31304162 PMCID: PMC6565986 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2013.12.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Description of the sample, according to sex.
| Variables | Mean ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | Female ( | ||
| Age (years) | 83.1±2.2 | 83.3±2.7 | 0.684 |
| Weight (kg) | 71.5±15.6 | 57.4±11.1 | ≤0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 164.3±7.1 | 149.8±6.8 | ≤0.001 |
| Femoral BMC (g) | 33.1±6 | 23.0±5.6 | ≤0.001 |
| Spinal BMC (g) | 73.3±19.3 | 45.1±12.5 | ≤0.001 |
| Femoral BMD (g/cm2) | 0.89±0.14 | 0.74±0.15 | ≤0.001 |
| Spinal BMD (g/cm2) | 1.16±0.24 | 0.93±0.17 | ≤0.001 |
BMC: bone mineral content; BMD: bone mineral density.
Association between bone mass and performance in the three functional tests on elderly people of both sexes.
| Bone mass | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance in the tests | Performance in the tests | |||||
| Worse | Better | Worse | Better | |||
| Low | 81.3% | 18.7% | ≤0.001 | 54.8% | 45.2% | 0.705 |
| High | 18.8% | 81.2% | 50% | 50% | ||
| Low | 56.3% | 43.7% | 0.480 | 61.3% | 38.7% | 0.160 |
| High | 43.8% | 56.2% | 43.3% | 56.7% | ||
| Low | 64.7% | 35.3% | 0.077 | 55.3% | 44.7% | 0.573 |
| High | 33.3% | 66.7% | 47.8% | 52.2% | ||
| Low | 50% | 50% | 1.000 | 57.6% | 42.4% | 0.311 |
| High | 50% | 50% | 44.4% | 55.6% | ||
BMC: bone mineral content; BMD: bone mineral density.
Association between bone mass and functional performance in men.
| Bone mass | Performance in the tests | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Balance | Lower-limb strength | |||||||
| Worse | Better | Worse | Better | Worse | Better | ||||
| Low | 87.5% | 12.5% | 0.009 | 50% | 50% | 0.006 | 81.3% | 18.8% | 0.127 |
| High | 43.8% | 56.3% | 6.3% | 93.8% | 56.3% | 43.8% | |||
| Low | 68.8% | 31.3% | 0.710 | 31.3% | 68.8% | 0.694 | 68.8% | 31.3% | 1.000 |
| High | 62.5% | 37.5% | 25% | 75% | 68.8% | 31.3% | |||
| Low | 76.5% | 23.5% | 0.169 | 29.4% | 70.6% | 0.863 | 76.5% | 23.5% | 0.316 |
| High | 53.3% | 46.7% | 26.7% | 73.3% | 60% | 40% | |||
| Low | 72.2% | 27.8% | 0.373 | 27.8% | 72.2% | 0.960 | 55.6% | 44.4% | 0.068 |
| High | 57.1% | 42.9% | 28.6% | 71.4% | 85.7% | 14.3% | |||
BMC: bone mineral content; BMD: bone mineral density.
Association between bone mass and functional performance in women.
| Bone mass | Performance in the tests | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Balance | Lower-limb strength | |||||||
| Worse | Better | Worse | Better | Worse | Better | ||||
| Low | 71% | 29% | 0.717 | 41.9% | 58.1% | 0.332 | 77.4% | 22.6% | 0.510 |
| High | 66.7% | 33.3% | 30% | 70% | 70% | 30 | |||
| Low | 77.4% | 22.6% | 0.142 | 35.5% | 64.5% | 0.923 | 74.2% | 25.8 | 0.939 |
| High | 60% | 40% | 36.7% | 63.3% | 73.3% | 26.7 | |||
| Low | 68.4% | 31.6% | 0.925 | 39.5% | 60.5% | 0.476 | 76.3% | 23.7% | 0.561 |
| High | 69.6% | 30.4% | 30.4% | 69.6% | 69.6% | 30.4% | |||
| Low | 66.7% | 33.3% | 0.759 | 36.4% | 63.6% | 0.807 | 72.7% | 27.3% | 0.907 |
| High | 70.4% | 29.6% | 33.3% | 66.7% | 74.1% | 25.9% | |||
BMC: bone mineral content; BMD: bone mineral density.