Literature DB >> 14667133

Dual hip bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: geometry and effect of physical activity.

R A Brownbill1, C Lindsey, Z Crncevic-Orlic, J Z Ilich.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (1) obtain both femoral neck strength (FNS) and hip axis length (HAL) values from left and right femurs (regardless of hip dominance) measured by DXA and evaluate their relationship with BMD of all hip regions including total hip, (2) determine if there is a difference between dominant and nondominant hip BMD in any of the hip regions, and (3) determine how physical activity influences hip BMD. Participants were 136, generally healthy Caucasian women (57.4-88.6 years). BMD was measured by DPX-MD. Past and present activity was assessed by the Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey for older adults and normal/brisk walking pace was measured in a straight hallway. FNS analysis uses femoral geometry to calculate stresses at the femoral neck for two loading conditions: Safety Factor Index (SF) indicates risk of fracture for forces generated during a one-legged stance, and Fall Index (FI) indicates risk of fracture for forces generated during a fall on the greater trochanter. Simple and multiple regression analyses were used to determine predictive ability of HAL, SF, and FI for respective hip BMD values. There was no statistical difference in BMD between two hips in any of the measured regions, however, the nondominant hip correlated better with other skeletal sites. Subjects with a faster normal walking speed had higher neck BMD in the nondominant hip, 0.832 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.791 +/- 0.10 g/cm2 (P < 0.05). Longer HAL of the left hip was negatively related to neck, trochanter, shaft, and total hip BMD. FI was significantly associated with all sites of the hip BMD, while SF was associated only with neck and wards BMC (P < 0.05). In summary: (1) a longer HAL is associated with lower BMD and a higher FI with higher BMD, (2) it might be sufficient to measure BMD in only the nondominant hip, and (3) walking at a faster pace may positively benefit femoral neck BMD. Therefore, it appears that HAL, SF, and FI all play important roles in estimating fracture risk and should be assessed along with BMD when using DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14667133     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-002-1066-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

1.  Leisure time physical activity in adulthood is positively associated with bone mineral density 22 years later. The Tromsø study.

Authors:  Bente Morseth; Nina Emaus; Tom Wilsgaard; Bjarne K Jacobsen; Lone Jørgensen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Expected frequency of biomechanically adverse values of proximal femur geometric variables for fracture risk in the East Slovak female population (epidemiological study).

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29

Review 3.  Hip geometry and its role in fracture: what do we know so far?

Authors:  Rhonda A Brownbill; Jasminka Z Ilich
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Association of unipedal standing time and bone mineral density in community-dwelling Japanese women.

Authors:  A Sakai; N Toba; M Takeda; M Suzuki; Y Abe; K Aoyagi; T Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The development of bone mineral lateralization in the arms.

Authors:  K Siminoski; K-C Lee; S Abish; N Alos; L Bell; T Blydt-Hansen; R Couch; E A Cummings; J Ellsworth; J Feber; C V Fernandez; J Halton; A M Huber; S Israels; R Jurencak; B Lang; C Laverdière; C LeBlanc; V Lewis; J Midgley; P M Miettunen; K Oen; V Phan; M Pinsk; F Rauch; C Rodd; J Roth; C Saint-Cyr; R Scuccimarri; D Stephure; S Taback; B Wilson; L M Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Differences in bone mineral density between the right and left hips in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Hwang; Si Young Park; Soon Hyuck Lee; Seung Bum Han; Kyung Han Ro
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Mortality benefits of population-wide adherence to national physical activity guidelines: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gráinne Long; Clare Watkinson; Søren Brage; Jerry Morris; Bill Tuxworth; Peter Fentem; Simon Griffin; Rebecca Simmons; Nicholas Wareham
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Association between bone mass and functional capacity among elderly people aged 80 years and over.

Authors:  Vanessa Ribeiro Dos Santos; Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro; Igor Conterato Gomes; Jamile Sanches Codogno; Lionai Lima Dos Santos; Ismael Forte Freitas Júnior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2013-12-25

9.  Dominant vs. non-dominant hip comparison in bone mineral density in young sporting athletes.

Authors:  James A van Santen; Claudio Pereira; Maria T Sanchez-Santos; Cyrus Cooper; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide scans for human adult stature identifies novel Loci and associations with measures of skeletal frame size.

Authors:  Nicole Soranzo; Fernando Rivadeneira; Usha Chinappen-Horsley; Ida Malkina; J Brent Richards; Naomi Hammond; Lisette Stolk; Alexandra Nica; Michael Inouye; Albert Hofman; Jonathan Stephens; Eleanor Wheeler; Pascal Arp; Rhian Gwilliam; P Mila Jhamai; Simon Potter; Amy Chaney; Mohammed J R Ghori; Radhi Ravindrarajah; Sergey Ermakov; Karol Estrada; Huibert A P Pols; Frances M Williams; Wendy L McArdle; Joyce B van Meurs; Ruth J F Loos; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Kourosh R Ahmadi; Deborah J Hart; Willem H Ouwehand; Nicholas J Wareham; Inês Barroso; Manjinder S Sandhu; David P Strachan; Gregory Livshits; Timothy D Spector; André G Uitterlinden; Panos Deloukas
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.