Literature DB >> 31301084

Mucin 21 is a key molecule involved in the incohesive growth pattern in lung adenocarcinoma.

Taichiro Yoshimoto1, Daisuke Matsubara1, Manabu Soda2, Toshihide Ueno2,3, Yusuke Amano1, Atsushi Kihara1, Takashi Sakatani4, Tomoyuki Nakano5, Tomoki Shibano5, Shunsuke Endo5, Koichi Hagiwara6, Masashi Fukayama7, Kaori Denda-Nagai8, Tatsuro Irimura8, Hiroyuki Mano2,3, Toshiro Niki1.   

Abstract

Decreased cell adhesion has been reported as a significant negative prognostic factor of lung cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the cell incohesiveness in lung cancer have not yet been elucidated in detail. We herein describe a rare histological variant of lung adenocarcinoma consisting almost entirely of individual cancer cells spreading in alveolar spaces in an incohesive pattern. A whole exome analysis of this case showed no genomic abnormalities in CDH1 or other genes encoding cell adhesion molecules. However, whole mRNA sequencing revealed that this case had an extremely high expression level of mucin 21 (MUC21), a mucin molecule that was previously shown to inhibit cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion. The strong membranous expression of MUC21 was found on cancer cells using mAbs recognizing different O-glycosylated forms of MUC21. An immunohistochemical analysis of an unselected series of lung adenocarcinoma confirmed that the strong membranous expression of MUC21 correlated with incohesiveness. Thus, MUC21 could be a promising biomarker with potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications for lung adenocarcinoma showing cell incohesiveness.
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MUC21; STAS; adenocarcinoma; cell adhesion; lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31301084      PMCID: PMC6726699          DOI: 10.1111/cas.14129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


INTRODUCTION

The importance of decreased cell adhesion in cancer progression and metastasis is being increasingly recognized.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Cancer cells showing decreased cell adhesion are associated with cancer spread through vessels or alveolar spaces.2, 5, 6 However, the molecular mechanisms underlying cell incohesiveness have not yet been elucidated. The mucin family is involved in various aspects of cancer progression, such as cell adhesion, epithelial‐mesenchymal transition, cell signaling, and the tumor microenvironment.7 Mucins either alone or through interactions with receptor tyrosine kinases have been shown to mediate cell signals for the growth and survival of lung cancer cells.8 We herein report a rare histological variant of lung adenocarcinoma, in which individual cancer cells spread in the alveolar spaces in an incohesive pattern. This histological variant of adenocarcinoma has only rarely been reported in English published works.9, 10 In the present study, a whole genomic analysis and immunohistochemical validation allowed us to identify mucin 21 (MUC21) as a molecule associated with cell incohesiveness in lung adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case description

Computed tomography detected an irregular mass in the S6 segment of the right lower lobe of a 72‐year‐old Japanese woman with no history of smoking. She had no previous history of tuberculosis or other lung diseases. She underwent right lower lobectomy and the resected specimen showed that she had stage 3A (pT2AN2M0) disease. She received 4 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy (a combination of carboplatin and gemcitabine), followed by uracil/tegafur given orally at a dose of 600 mg/d as maintenance therapy for 3 years. She showed no signs of recurrence for 45 months after surgery. However, she died 50 months after surgery due to an unknown cause.

Genome‐wide analysis

DNA and RNA were extracted from the frozen tissue of the resected specimen. DNA was subjected to whole exome next‐generation sequencing (NGS) analyses using the HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina) as previously described.11 RNA was subjected to whole transcriptome sequencing.

Electron microscopic analysis

A small tissue sample was excised from a paraffin block of the tumor specimen, dewaxed, rehydrated, and processed for a transmission electron microscopic analysis.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Sections were stained for thyroid transcription factor‐1 (TTF‐1), Napsin A, CD68, E‐cadherin, and β‐catenin, as described previously.11 Mucin 21 was detected using 3 mouse monoclonal anti‐MUC21 antibodies (heM21A, C, and D) with the ability to distinguish the different glycoforms of MUC21,12, 13 as shown in Table S1. Expression of MUC21 was also analyzed in a consecutive series of 120 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas. The relationships between MUC21 expression and morphological features, such as histological patterns and cell incohesiveness in air spaces, were examined. The results obtained were independently evaluated by two pathologists (DM and TY). Evaluation criteria for each finding are shown in Table S2. If there was any discrepancy in the evaluation, 2 pathologists discussed and reached an agreement.

RESULTS

Representative images of the present case are shown in Figure 1. The tumor was 4.0 × 2.5 × 2.5 cm in size, and its cut surface showed a 2.0 × 1.2 cm fibrotic focus, which was surrounded by a medullary zone that merged with a poorly marginated, pneumonia‐like area (Figure 1A). A microscopic examination revealed that tumor cells mostly grew in an incohesive pattern in alveolar spaces or bronchioles, mimicking alveolar macrophages (Figure 1B,C). This incohesive pattern was consistently found in tumor cells that invaded vessels, bronchi, and pleura, and also in those that metastasized to the lymph nodes (Figure S1). A lepidic or papillary pattern was found in only a small area. Tumor cells had mucin on their surfaces under periodic acid‐Schiff (not shown) and Alcian blue staining (Figure 1D).
Figure 1

Lung adenocarcinoma of a 72‐year‐old Japanese woman. A, Gross view of the tumor. B,C, Microscopically, tumor cells predominantly grew in an incohesive pattern mimicking alveolar macrophages. The lepidic or papillary pattern was minimal (H&E stain). D, Tumor cells showed mucin on their surface (Alcian blue stain). E,F, Tumor cells were positive for TTF‐1 (E) and negative for CD68 (F). G,H, E‐Cadherin and β‐catenin were positive, but mainly cytoplasmic. I,J, Ultrastructurally, tumor cells showed numerous long villi. Original magnification: (B) 200×, (C) 400×, (D) 600×, (E‐H) 400×, (I) 3000×, (J) 15 000×

Lung adenocarcinoma of a 72‐year‐old Japanese woman. A, Gross view of the tumor. B,C, Microscopically, tumor cells predominantly grew in an incohesive pattern mimicking alveolar macrophages. The lepidic or papillary pattern was minimal (H&E stain). D, Tumor cells showed mucin on their surface (Alcian blue stain). E,F, Tumor cells were positive for TTF‐1 (E) and negative for CD68 (F). G,H, E‐Cadherin and β‐catenin were positive, but mainly cytoplasmic. I,J, Ultrastructurally, tumor cells showed numerous long villi. Original magnification: (B) 200×, (C) 400×, (D) 600×, (E‐H) 400×, (I) 3000×, (J) 15 000× Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for TTF‐1 (Figure 1E) and Napsin A (not shown), and negative for CD68 (Figure 1F). E‐Cadherin and β‐catenin were positive; however, their location was mainly cytoplasmic (Figure 1G,H). Ultrastructurally, tumor cells had numerous long villi on their surfaces (Figure 1I,J). Whole exome sequencing with NGS detected the E746‐A750 frame deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene. No other mutations in other major driver genes or single nucleotide variants of major cell adhesion molecules (such as CDH1 and CTNNB1) were detected (Table S3). No significant CNAs were found in these genes, including CDH1 (Figure S2). Next, we examined transcriptome data to identify the key molecules involved in the tumor incohesiveness of this case. We selected genes that were more strongly expressed in this case than in a cohort of 40 lung adenocarcinoma cases. Among the 4 genes that were expressed at levels more than 20‐fold higher in this case than the average of the cohort, we focused on MUC21 because its absolute value was the highest among these 4 genes (Figure 2A and Table S4). Furthermore, MUC21 is a large glycoprotein that inhibits cell adhesion through steric hindrance on the cell surface.12, 13
Figure 2

A, Expression levels of mucin 21 (MUC21) in this case and a cohort of 40 cases. The vertical line shows the reads per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads. B‐D, The majority of cancer cells showed strong membranous staining with all 3 MUC21 Abs: heM21A (B), heM21C (C), and heM21D (D). Original magnification: 400×

A, Expression levels of mucin 21 (MUC21) in this case and a cohort of 40 cases. The vertical line shows the reads per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads. B‐D, The majority of cancer cells showed strong membranous staining with all 3 MUC21 Abs: heM21A (B), heM21C (C), and heM21D (D). Original magnification: 400× We validated these results by immunohistochemistry using 3 mouse mAbs (heM21A, heM21C, and heM21D) that recognize different glycoforms of MUC21.12, 13 As shown in Figure 2B‐D, the majority of cancer cells in the present case showed strong membranous staining with all 3 MUC21 Abs. We then stained a series of 121 lung adenocarcinoma cases with these MUC21 Abs. When evaluated as a whole, the frequencies of MUC21 positivity for each mAb were 31.4% (38/121) for heM21A, 21.5% (26/121) for heM21C, and 4.1% (5/121) for heM21D. The relationships between their expression and clinicopathological variables are shown in Table S5. As MUC21 was heterogeneously expressed within the same tumor, we evaluated MUC21 expression for each histological pattern (Figure 3A). Each anti‐MUC21 antibody was consistently positive in the incohesive pattern. The frequency of MUC21 positivity was lower in other histological patterns, but was slightly higher in the micropapillary, papillary, and lepidic patterns than in the acinar and solid patterns (Figure 3B‐D). Representative figures are shown in Figure S3.
Figure 3

Mucin 21 (MUC21) expression in a series of lung adenocarcinomas. A, Frequencies of histological patterns in a series of 120 lung adenocarcinoma cases plus the present case. Micropap, micropapillary. B‐D, The frequencies of heM21A (B), heM21C (C), and heM21D (D) positivities in each histological pattern. All 3 cases of incohesive patterns were positive for heM21A, C, and D. P values were calculated by using Fisher's exact test. *(Micropapillary + lepidic + papillary) vs (acinar + solid + invasive mucinous). **(Incohesive) vs (all the other patterns)

Mucin 21 (MUC21) expression in a series of lung adenocarcinomas. A, Frequencies of histological patterns in a series of 120 lung adenocarcinoma cases plus the present case. Micropap, micropapillary. B‐D, The frequencies of heM21A (B), heM21C (C), and heM21D (D) positivities in each histological pattern. All 3 cases of incohesive patterns were positive for heM21A, C, and D. P values were calculated by using Fisher's exact test. *(Micropapillary + lepidic + papillary) vs (acinar + solid + invasive mucinous). **(Incohesive) vs (all the other patterns) We also investigated the relationship between cell incohesiveness and MUC21 expression. MUC21 was strongly expressed in various patterns of incohesive cancer cells (Figure S4). As shown in Table 1, MUC21 expression scored as a whole tumor (as described in Table S2) correlated with the presence of incohesive cancer cells. We also evaluated MUC21 expression separately in the “Cohesive component” and “Incohesive component” in 13 cases that showed extensive cell incohesiveness. The total score for MUC21 expression was slightly higher in the incohesive component than in the cohesive component in these cases (Table S6). Although we did not observe a significant difference, cell adhesion of tumor cells with these cell incohesive patterns may have already decreased, even in the cohesive component.
Table 1

Correlation between expression of mucin 21 and cell incohesiveness

 With incohesive component (n = 13)Without incohesive component (n = 108) P value
heM21A
Positive830.0234
Negative578
heM21C
Positive620.0328
Negative 788
heM21D
Positive41.0004
Negative9107

P values calculated by Fisher's exact test.

Correlation between expression of mucin 21 and cell incohesiveness P values calculated by Fisher's exact test. We also analyzed the prognostic significance of MUC21 expression. No correlation was found between MUC21 expression (evaluated as in Table S2) and clinical outcomes (Figure S5A). As a proportion of papillary and acinar adenocarcinomas showed MUC21 expression only on the luminal side, but not on the basolateral side of the cell membrane (as shown in Figure S3C), we reasoned that these “only luminal” cases may be masking the prognostic impact of MUC21 expression. When we reassigned cases showing “only luminal” pattern expression as negative, heM21A and heM21C correlated with shorter disease‐free survival (Figure S5B).

DISCUSSION

We herein analyzed the molecular profile of a histological variant of lung adenocarcinoma that showed an incohesive growth pattern. This histology‐driven, NGS‐based analysis identified MUC21 as a key molecule associated with cell incohesive growth. MUC21 is the newest member of the mucin family initially identified as a novel transmembrane mucin gene that is highly likely to correspond to murine epiglycanin.12 MUC21 is expressed as a large glycoprotein at the cell surface and inhibits cell‐cell and cell‐matrix adhesion through steric hindrance caused by the large highly glycosylated TR domain.14 These biological properties of MUC21 implicate it as a strong candidate molecule causally involved in cell incohesiveness in lung adenocarcinoma. Decreased cell adhesion may play a role in tumor metastasis by facilitating cell invasion and spread through lymphatics, vascular vessels, pleura, and air spaces.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The last may be represented by “spread through air spaces” (STAS), a recently proposed mode of tumor invasion.6 Although there is a possibility that STAS could be a product of mechanical artifact,15, 16 we hypothesize that MUC21 plays a role in producing STAS by decreased cell adhesion. MUC21 has clinical potential as a serum biomarker and therapeutic target.7, 8 The detection of MUC21 in serum may help to identify patients at high risk of recurrence preoperatively. MUC21 targeted therapy (including immunotherapy) may be envisioned for a fraction of refractory cancer cells floating in body fluids or tissues. Our results provide a rationale for further studies on this interesting molecule.

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no conflict of interest. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer.

Authors:  Ugo Cavallaro; Gerhard Christofori
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Mucin 21/epiglycanin modulates cell adhesion.

Authors:  Yuri Yi; Mika Kamata-Sakurai; Kaori Denda-Nagai; Tomoko Itoh; Kyoko Okada; Katrin Ishii-Schrade; Akihiro Iguchi; Daisuke Sugiura; Tatsuro Irimura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A Prospective Study of Loose Tissue Fragments in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection Specimens: An Alternative View to "Spread Through Air Spaces".

Authors:  Hans Blaauwgeers; Douglas Flieder; Arne Warth; Alexander Harms; Kim Monkhorst; Birgit Witte; Erik Thunnissen
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Tumor Spread through Air Spaces is an Important Pattern of Invasion and Impacts the Frequency and Location of Recurrences after Limited Resection for Small Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Kyuichi Kadota; Jun-Ichi Nitadori; Camelia S Sima; Hideki Ujiie; Nabil P Rizk; David R Jones; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Cell incohesiveness and pattern of extension in a rare case of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

Authors:  T Kodama; T Kameya; Y Shimosato; H Koketsu; T Yoneyama; S Tamai
Journal:  Ultrastruct Pathol       Date:  1980 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.094

6.  Receptor for hyaluronic acid-mediated motility (RHAMM, CD168) expression is prognostically important in both nodal negative and nodal positive large cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Michael Fiegl; Thomas Schmid; Geoffrey Pomme; William Sterlacci; Alexandar Tzankov
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Mucins in cancer: function, prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Donald W Kufe
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Mucin 21 is a key molecule involved in the incohesive growth pattern in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Taichiro Yoshimoto; Daisuke Matsubara; Manabu Soda; Toshihide Ueno; Yusuke Amano; Atsushi Kihara; Takashi Sakatani; Tomoyuki Nakano; Tomoki Shibano; Shunsuke Endo; Koichi Hagiwara; Masashi Fukayama; Kaori Denda-Nagai; Tatsuro Irimura; Hiroyuki Mano; Toshiro Niki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  Aggressive adenocarcinoma of the lung consisting solely of discohesive cells.

Authors:  Yoshiki Kozu; Mitsuhiro Isaka; Yasuhisa Ohde; Takashi Nakajima
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Inactivating mutations and hypermethylation of the NKX2-1/TTF-1 gene in non-terminal respiratory unit-type lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Daisuke Matsubara; Manabu Soda; Taichiro Yoshimoto; Yusuke Amano; Yuji Sakuma; Azusa Yamato; Toshihide Ueno; Shinya Kojima; Tomoki Shibano; Yasuyuki Hosono; Masahito Kawazu; Yoshihiro Yamashita; Shunsuke Endo; Koichi Hagiwara; Masashi Fukayama; Takashi Takahashi; Hiroyuki Mano; Toshiro Niki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  9 in total

1.  Unique Glycoform-Dependent Monoclonal Antibodies for Mouse Mucin 21.

Authors:  Jun Nishida; Shigeyuki Shichino; Tatsuya Tsukui; Mayumi Hoshino; Tomoko Okada; Kyoko Okada; Yuri Yi; Seiko Toraya-Brown; Miho Mochizuki; Ryouta Koizumi; Katrin Ishii-Schrade; Kaori Denda-Nagai; Tatsuro Irimura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Mucin 21 is a key molecule involved in the incohesive growth pattern in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Taichiro Yoshimoto; Daisuke Matsubara; Manabu Soda; Toshihide Ueno; Yusuke Amano; Atsushi Kihara; Takashi Sakatani; Tomoyuki Nakano; Tomoki Shibano; Shunsuke Endo; Koichi Hagiwara; Masashi Fukayama; Kaori Denda-Nagai; Tatsuro Irimura; Hiroyuki Mano; Toshiro Niki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 3.  Mucins and Pathogenic Mucin-Like Molecules Are Immunomodulators During Infection and Targets for Diagnostics and Vaccines.

Authors:  Sandra Pinzón Martín; Peter H Seeberger; Daniel Varón Silva
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  RNA sequencing identifies transcriptional changes in the rabbit larynx in response to low humidity challenge.

Authors:  Taylor W Bailey; Andrea Pires Dos Santos; Naila Cannes do Nascimento; Shaojun Xie; Jyothi Thimmapuram; M Preeti Sivasankar; Abigail Cox
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Differential MUC22 expression by epigenetic alterations in human lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shuye Lin; Cuimeng Tian; Jianhui Li; Bin Liu; Teng Ma; Keqiang Chen; Wanghua Gong; Ji Ming Wang; Jiaqiang Huang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  MUC21 induces the viability and migration of glioblastoma via the STAT3/AKT pathway.

Authors:  Leibo Wang; Xuebin Zhang; Jun Liu; Qingjun Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Mucin 21 confers resistance to apoptosis in an O-glycosylation-dependent manner.

Authors:  Yuan Tian; Kaori Denda-Nagai; Tatsuya Tsukui; Katrin B Ishii-Schrade; Kyoko Okada; Yoshihiro Nishizono; Kosuke Matsuzaki; Margarete Hafley; Robert S Bresalier; Tatsuro Irimura
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2022-04-11

8.  The prognostic influence of histological subtypes of micropapillary tumors on patients with lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm.

Authors:  Liangdong Xu; Hangcheng Zhou; Gaoxiang Wang; Zhining Huang; Ran Xiong; Xiaohui Sun; Mingsheng Wu; Tian Li; Mingran Xie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Expression of Mucin Family Proteins in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and its Role in Evaluation of Prognosis.

Authors:  Jing Tu; Min Tang; Guoqing Li; Liang Chen; Yubo Wang; Yong Huang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.