| Literature DB >> 31301084 |
Taichiro Yoshimoto1, Daisuke Matsubara1, Manabu Soda2, Toshihide Ueno2,3, Yusuke Amano1, Atsushi Kihara1, Takashi Sakatani4, Tomoyuki Nakano5, Tomoki Shibano5, Shunsuke Endo5, Koichi Hagiwara6, Masashi Fukayama7, Kaori Denda-Nagai8, Tatsuro Irimura8, Hiroyuki Mano2,3, Toshiro Niki1.
Abstract
Decreased cell adhesion has been reported as a significant negative prognostic factor of lung cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the cell incohesiveness in lung cancer have not yet been elucidated in detail. We herein describe a rare histological variant of lung adenocarcinoma consisting almost entirely of individual cancer cells spreading in alveolar spaces in an incohesive pattern. A whole exome analysis of this case showed no genomic abnormalities in CDH1 or other genes encoding cell adhesion molecules. However, whole mRNA sequencing revealed that this case had an extremely high expression level of mucin 21 (MUC21), a mucin molecule that was previously shown to inhibit cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion. The strong membranous expression of MUC21 was found on cancer cells using mAbs recognizing different O-glycosylated forms of MUC21. An immunohistochemical analysis of an unselected series of lung adenocarcinoma confirmed that the strong membranous expression of MUC21 correlated with incohesiveness. Thus, MUC21 could be a promising biomarker with potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications for lung adenocarcinoma showing cell incohesiveness.Entities:
Keywords: MUC21; STAS; adenocarcinoma; cell adhesion; lung cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31301084 PMCID: PMC6726699 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Sci ISSN: 1347-9032 Impact factor: 6.716
Figure 1Lung adenocarcinoma of a 72‐year‐old Japanese woman. A, Gross view of the tumor. B,C, Microscopically, tumor cells predominantly grew in an incohesive pattern mimicking alveolar macrophages. The lepidic or papillary pattern was minimal (H&E stain). D, Tumor cells showed mucin on their surface (Alcian blue stain). E,F, Tumor cells were positive for TTF‐1 (E) and negative for CD68 (F). G,H, E‐Cadherin and β‐catenin were positive, but mainly cytoplasmic. I,J, Ultrastructurally, tumor cells showed numerous long villi. Original magnification: (B) 200×, (C) 400×, (D) 600×, (E‐H) 400×, (I) 3000×, (J) 15 000×
Figure 2A, Expression levels of mucin 21 (MUC21) in this case and a cohort of 40 cases. The vertical line shows the reads per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads. B‐D, The majority of cancer cells showed strong membranous staining with all 3 MUC21 Abs: heM21A (B), heM21C (C), and heM21D (D). Original magnification: 400×
Figure 3Mucin 21 (MUC21) expression in a series of lung adenocarcinomas. A, Frequencies of histological patterns in a series of 120 lung adenocarcinoma cases plus the present case. Micropap, micropapillary. B‐D, The frequencies of heM21A (B), heM21C (C), and heM21D (D) positivities in each histological pattern. All 3 cases of incohesive patterns were positive for heM21A, C, and D. P values were calculated by using Fisher's exact test. *(Micropapillary + lepidic + papillary) vs (acinar + solid + invasive mucinous). **(Incohesive) vs (all the other patterns)
Correlation between expression of mucin 21 and cell incohesiveness
| With incohesive component (n = 13) | Without incohesive component (n = 108) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| heM21A | |||
| Positive | 8 | 30 | .0234 |
| Negative | 5 | 78 | |
| heM21C | |||
| Positive | 6 | 20 | .0328 |
| Negative | 7 | 88 | |
| heM21D | |||
| Positive | 4 | 1 | .0004 |
| Negative | 9 | 107 | |
P values calculated by Fisher's exact test.