Kyuichi Kadota1, Jun-Ichi Nitadori2, Camelia S Sima3, Hideki Ujiie4, Nabil P Rizk4, David R Jones4, Prasad S Adusumilli5, William D Travis6. 1. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan. 2. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 4. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 5. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: adusumip@mskcc.org. 6. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: travisw@mskcc.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tumor invasion in lung adenocarcinoma is defined as infiltration of stroma, blood vessels, or pleura. Based on observation of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS), we considered whether this could represent new patterns of invasion and investigated whether it correlated with locoregional versus distant recurrence according to limited resection versus lobectomy. METHODS: We reviewed resected small (less than or equal to 2 cm) stage I lung adenocarcinomas (n = 411; 1995-2006). Tumor STAS was defined as tumor cells-micropapillary structures, solid nests, or single cells-spreading within air spaces in the lung parenchyma beyond the edge of the main tumor. Competing risks methods were used to estimate risk of disease recurrence and its associations with clinicopathological risk factors. RESULTS: STAS was observed in 155 cases (38%). In the limited resection group (n = 120), the risk of any recurrence was significantly higher in patients with STAS-positive tumors than that of patients with STAS-negative tumors (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 42.6% versus 10.9%; P < 0.001); the presence of STAS correlated with higher risk of distant (P = 0.035) and locoregional recurrence (P = 0.001). However, in the lobectomy group (n = 291), the presence of STAS was not associated with either any (P = 0.50) or distant recurrence (P = 0.76). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of tumor STAS remained independently associated with the risk of developing recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.08; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The presence of STAS is a significant risk factor of recurrence in small lung adenocarcinomas treated with limited resection. These findings support our proposal that STAS should formally be recognized as a pattern of invasion in lung adenocarcinoma.
INTRODUCTION:Tumor invasion in lung adenocarcinoma is defined as infiltration of stroma, blood vessels, or pleura. Based on observation of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS), we considered whether this could represent new patterns of invasion and investigated whether it correlated with locoregional versus distant recurrence according to limited resection versus lobectomy. METHODS: We reviewed resected small (less than or equal to 2 cm) stage I lung adenocarcinomas (n = 411; 1995-2006). Tumor STAS was defined as tumor cells-micropapillary structures, solid nests, or single cells-spreading within air spaces in the lung parenchyma beyond the edge of the main tumor. Competing risks methods were used to estimate risk of disease recurrence and its associations with clinicopathological risk factors. RESULTS: STAS was observed in 155 cases (38%). In the limited resection group (n = 120), the risk of any recurrence was significantly higher in patients with STAS-positive tumors than that of patients with STAS-negative tumors (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 42.6% versus 10.9%; P < 0.001); the presence of STAS correlated with higher risk of distant (P = 0.035) and locoregional recurrence (P = 0.001). However, in the lobectomy group (n = 291), the presence of STAS was not associated with either any (P = 0.50) or distant recurrence (P = 0.76). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of tumor STAS remained independently associated with the risk of developing recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.08; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The presence of STAS is a significant risk factor of recurrence in small lung adenocarcinomas treated with limited resection. These findings support our proposal that STAS should formally be recognized as a pattern of invasion in lung adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jun-ichi Nitadori; Adam J Bograd; Kyuichi Kadota; Camelia S Sima; Nabil P Rizk; Eduardo A Morales; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Masayuki Noguchi; Andrew G Nicholson; Kim R Geisinger; Yasushi Yatabe; David G Beer; Charles A Powell; Gregory J Riely; Paul E Van Schil; Kavita Garg; John H M Austin; Hisao Asamura; Valerie W Rusch; Fred R Hirsch; Giorgio Scagliotti; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Rudolf M Huber; Yuichi Ishikawa; James Jett; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Jean-Paul Sculier; Takashi Takahashi; Masahiro Tsuboi; Johan Vansteenkiste; Ignacio Wistuba; Pan-Chyr Yang; Denise Aberle; Christian Brambilla; Douglas Flieder; Wilbur Franklin; Adi Gazdar; Michael Gould; Philip Hasleton; Douglas Henderson; Bruce Johnson; David Johnson; Keith Kerr; Keiko Kuriyama; Jin Soo Lee; Vincent A Miller; Iver Petersen; Victor Roggli; Rafael Rosell; Nagahiro Saijo; Erik Thunnissen; Ming Tsao; David Yankelewitz Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: P Giraud; M Antoine; A Larrouy; B Milleron; P Callard; Y De Rycke; M F Carette; J C Rosenwald; J M Cosset; M Housset; E Touboul Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Y Makimoto; K Nabeshima; H Iwasaki; T Miyoshi; S Enatsu; T Shiraishi; A Iwasaki; T Shirakusa; M Kikuchi Journal: Histopathology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Maristela L Onozato; Alexandra E Kovach; Beow Y Yeap; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Veronica E Klepeis; Swathi Tammireddy; Rebecca S Heist; Eugene J Mark; Dora Dias-Santagata; A John Iafrate; Yukako Yagi; Mari Mino-Kenudson Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Kyuichi Kadota; Jonathan Villena-Vargas; Akihiko Yoshizawa; Noriko Motoi; Camelia S Sima; Gregory J Riely; Valerie W Rusch; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Koji Kameda; Takashi Eguchi; Shaohua Lu; Yang Qu; Kay See Tan; Kyuichi Kadota; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 15.609