Akos Varga-Szemes1, Emily A Aherne2, U Joseph Schoepf1, Thomas M Todoran3, Ioannis Koktzoglou4,5, Robert R Edelman2,4. 1. From the Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 2. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 4. Department of Radiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Balanced steady-state free precession-based quiescent-interval slice-selective (bSSFP QISS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is accurate for the noncontrast evaluation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD); however, drawbacks include the need for breath-holding when imaging the abdomen and pelvis, and sensitivity to off-resonance artifacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy in the pelvis and abdomen of free-breathing fast low-angle shot-based QISS (FLASH QISS) techniques in comparison to bSSFP QISS in patients with PAD, using computed tomographic angiography as the reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (69 ± 10 years, 17 men) with PAD were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study between April and December 2018. Patients underwent noncontrast MRA using standard bSSFP QISS and prototype free-breathing radial-FLASH and Cartesian-FLASH QISS at 3 T. A subset of patients (n = 22) also underwent computed tomographic angiography as the reference standard. Nine arterial segments per patient were evaluated spanning the abdomen, pelvis, and upper thigh regions. Objective (signal intensity ratio and relative standard deviation) and subjective image quality (4-point scale) and stenosis (>50%) were evaluated by 2 readers and compared using one-way analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and McNemar tests, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 179 vascular segments were available for analysis by all QISS techniques. No significant difference was observed among bSSFP, radial-FLASH, and Cartesian-FLASH QISS techniques in signal intensity ratio (P = 0.428) and relative standard deviation (P = 0.220). Radial-FLASH QISS demonstrated the best image quality (P < 0.0001) and the highest interreader agreement (κ = 0.721). The sensitivity values of bSSFP, radial-FLASH, and Cartesian-FLASH QISS for the detection of greater than 50% stenosis were 76.0%, 84.0%, and 80.0%, respectively, whereas specificity values were 97.6%, 94.0%, and 92.8%, respectively. Moreover, FLASH QISS consistently reduced off-resonance artifacts compared with bSSFP QISS. CONCLUSIONS: Free-breathing FLASH QISS MRA techniques provide improved image quality and sensitivity, high specificity, and reduced off-resonance artifacts for vascular stenosis detection in the abdomen and pelvis.
OBJECTIVES: Balanced steady-state free precession-based quiescent-interval slice-selective (bSSFP QISS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is accurate for the noncontrast evaluation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD); however, drawbacks include the need for breath-holding when imaging the abdomen and pelvis, and sensitivity to off-resonance artifacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy in the pelvis and abdomen of free-breathing fast low-angle shot-based QISS (FLASH QISS) techniques in comparison to bSSFP QISS in patients with PAD, using computed tomographic angiography as the reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (69 ± 10 years, 17 men) with PAD were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study between April and December 2018. Patients underwent noncontrast MRA using standard bSSFP QISS and prototype free-breathing radial-FLASH and Cartesian-FLASH QISS at 3 T. A subset of patients (n = 22) also underwent computed tomographic angiography as the reference standard. Nine arterial segments per patient were evaluated spanning the abdomen, pelvis, and upper thigh regions. Objective (signal intensity ratio and relative standard deviation) and subjective image quality (4-point scale) and stenosis (>50%) were evaluated by 2 readers and compared using one-way analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and McNemar tests, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 179 vascular segments were available for analysis by all QISS techniques. No significant difference was observed among bSSFP, radial-FLASH, and Cartesian-FLASH QISS techniques in signal intensity ratio (P = 0.428) and relative standard deviation (P = 0.220). Radial-FLASH QISS demonstrated the best image quality (P < 0.0001) and the highest interreader agreement (κ = 0.721). The sensitivity values of bSSFP, radial-FLASH, and Cartesian-FLASH QISS for the detection of greater than 50% stenosis were 76.0%, 84.0%, and 80.0%, respectively, whereas specificity values were 97.6%, 94.0%, and 92.8%, respectively. Moreover, FLASH QISS consistently reduced off-resonance artifacts compared with bSSFP QISS. CONCLUSIONS: Free-breathing FLASH QISS MRA techniques provide improved image quality and sensitivity, high specificity, and reduced off-resonance artifacts for vascular stenosis detection in the abdomen and pelvis.
Authors: Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Robert R Edelman; John J Sheehan; Eugene Dunkle; Nancy Schindler; James Carr; Ioannis Koktzoglou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Vikas Gulani; Fernando Calamante; Frank G Shellock; Emanuel Kanal; Scott B Reeder Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Philip A Hodnett; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Amir H Davarpanah; Timothy G Scanlon; Jeremy D Collins; John J Sheehan; Eugene E Dunkle; Navyash Gupta; James C Carr; Robert R Edelman Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Thom W Rooke; Alan T Hirsch; Sanjay Misra; Anton N Sidawy; Joshua A Beckman; Laura Findeiss; Jafar Golzarian; Heather L Gornik; Michael R Jaff; Gregory L Moneta; Jeffrey W Olin; James C Stanley; Christopher J White; John V White; R Eugene Zierler Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert R Edelman; S Giri; A Pursnani; M P F Botelho; W Li; I Koktzoglou Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Mathias Pamminger; Gert Klug; Christof Kranewitter; Martin Reindl; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Benjamin Henninger; Christina Tiller; Magdalena Holzknecht; Christian Kremser; Axel Bauer; Werner Jaschke; Bernhard Metzler; Agnes Mayr Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 5.315