Literature DB >> 31297995

[Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis].

Chao Yuan1, Chao Liu1, Junhong Shen1, Huake Tian1, Wenjie Zheng1, Chao Zhang1, Yong Pan1, Bo Huang1, Tao Jiang1, Zhengfeng Zhang1, Changqing Li1, Jian Wang2, Yue Zhou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical results and complication prevention of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: The clinical data of 112 patients with severe LSS treated with MIS-TLIF between January 2010 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 43 males and 69 females, aged 52-81 years, with an average age of 65.3 years. The disease duration ranged from 4 to 126 months, with an average of 10.5 months. Clinical manifestations: 104 cases of low back pain, 91 cases of nervous intermittent claudication of both lower limbs, 21 cases of unilateral nerve root pain and/or numbness, and 5 cases of cauda equina nerve injury. The 112 cases were all severe central spinal stenosis, including 32 cases with lateral recess stenosis, 20 cases with foramen stenosis, 9 cases with ossification of ligamentum flavum, 38 cases with disc herniation; 14 cases with two complications and 5 cases with three. Stenosis segment: L 3, 4 in 6 cases, L 4, 5 in 89 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 17 cases. Surgical methods included bilateral decompression through bilateral approach (60 cases), bilateral decompression through unilateral approach (15 cases), and unilateral decompression (37 cases). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, fusion rate, and surgical complications were recorded. At last follow-up, the lumbar fusion was evaluated by Bridwell method, grades Ⅰ and Ⅱ were expressed as fusion.
RESULTS: The operation time was 83-186 minutes (mean, 126.8 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 65-630 mL (mean, 163.1 mL). All the 112 patients were followed up 25-49 months, with an average of 35.1 months. The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score at each time point after operation were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the VAS score of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score at the other time points except 1 month after operation ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, 2 cases of cauda equina nerve injury recovered and 3 cases partially recovered. According to Bridwell classification criteria, 58 cases were grade Ⅰ, 47 cases were grade Ⅱ, and 7 cases were grade Ⅲ. The fusion rate was 93.8%. Perioperative complications included 5 cases of incision complications (superficial infection in 3 cases, hematoma formation in 2 cases), 19 cases of internal fixator complications (intraoperative end plate fracture in 8 cases, fusion cage sinking in 11 cases at last follow-up), and 15 cases of neurological complications (dural sac tear in 10 cases, transient neurological symptoms of lower extremities aggravated in 5 cases).
CONCLUSION: MIS-TLIF treatment of single-level severe LSS can achieve good clinical results, while there is a risk of serious complications. Full understanding of the clinical and imaging features of the disease and reasonable and careful operation are helpful to control the occurrence of cauda equina nerve damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar spinal stenosis; complication; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31297995      PMCID: PMC8337423          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  18 in total

1.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna Tosteson; Emily Blood; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Langston T Holly; James D Schwender
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].

Authors:  Qihua Qi; Qiang Xiao; Liang Deng; Chen Li; Xieping Dong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2015-10

7.  Chronic low back pain measurement with visual analogue scales in different settings.

Authors:  Michael Ogon; Martin Krismer; Wolfgang Söllner; Wilhelm Kantner-Rumplmair; Astrid Lampe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects?

Authors:  K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; K W McEnery; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study.

Authors:  Y Ishimoto; N Yoshimura; S Muraki; H Yamada; K Nagata; H Hashizume; N Takiguchi; A Minamide; H Oka; H Kawaguchi; K Nakamura; T Akune; M Yoshida
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Li; Chun-Ming Huang; Cheng-Fan Zhong; Rong-Wei Liang; Shao-Jian Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.