Literature DB >> 22796511

Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study.

Y Ishimoto1, N Yoshimura, S Muraki, H Yamada, K Nagata, H Hashizume, N Takiguchi, A Minamide, H Oka, H Kawaguchi, K Nakamura, T Akune, M Yoshida.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to clarify the association between symptomatic LSS and physical performance using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a population-based cohort.
DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was performed as a part of the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability (ROAD) in Japan and 1,009 subjects (335 men, 674 women, mean age 66.3 years, age range 21-97 years) were analyzed. An experienced orthopedic surgeon obtained the medical history and performed the physical testing for all participants. Symptomatic LSS diagnostic criteria required the presence of both symptoms and radiographic LSS findings. A 6-m walking time, chair standing time, and one-leg standing time were obtained from all participants.
RESULTS: The prevalence of symptomatic LSS was 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7-11.3) overall, 10.1% (CI: 7.4-13.8) in men and 8.9% (CI: 7.0-11.3) in women. There was a difference in the prevalence with increasing age by gender. The LSS prevalence showed little difference with age greater than 70 years for men, but the LSS prevalence for women was higher with increasing age. Among physical performance measures, 6-m walking time at a maximal pace was significantly associated with symptomatic LSS (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of symptomatic LSS was approximately 10% in a cohort resembling the general Japanese population. A 6-m walking time at a maximal pace was a more sensitive index than walking at a usual pace in assessing decreased physical performance associated with symptomatic LSS.
Copyright © 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22796511     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  60 in total

1.  Relationships among Disability, Quality of Life, and Physical Fitness in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Investigation of Elderly Korean Women.

Authors:  Saejong Park; Ho Sung Han; Gang-Un Kim; Sung Shik Kang; Ho-Joong Kim; Mihyun Lee; Soo Hyun Park; Kyu Hwan Choi; Sung-Ho Kim; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?

Authors:  Greger Lønne; Bent Ødegård; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Tore K Solberg; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Øystein P Nygaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Wilco C H Jacobs; Erik W van Zwet; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Bart W Koes; Carmen Lam Vleggeert-Lankamp; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Characteristics of sagittal spine-pelvis-leg alignment in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Weng; Wei-Jun Wang; Ming-Da Wu; Zhi-Hong Xu; Lei-Lei Xu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Association of Neuromuscular Attributes With Performance-Based Mobility Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Catherine T Schmidt; Rachel E Ward; Pradeep Suri; Dan K Kiely; Pengsheng Ni; Dennis E Anderson; Jonathan F Bean
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The prevalence of tandem spinal stenosis and its characteristics in a population-based MRI study: The Wakayama Spine Study.

Authors:  Keiji Nagata; Noriko Yoshimura; Hiroshi Hashizume; Yuyu Ishimoto; Shigeyuki Muraki; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroyuki Oka; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Toru Akune; Sakae Tanaka; Kozo Nakamura; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Danish national clinical guidelines for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Rikke Rousing; Rikke Krüger Jensen; Søren Fruensgaard; Janni Strøm; Helle Algren Brøgger; Jørgen Dan Møller Degn; Mikkel Ø Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Health Characteristics, Neuromuscular Attributes, and Mobility Among Primary Care Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine T Schmidt; Rachel E Ward; Pradeep Suri; Laura Kurlinski; Dennis E Anderson; Dan K Kiely; Jonathan F Bean
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2017 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

9.  [Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Chao Yuan; Chao Liu; Junhong Shen; Huake Tian; Wenjie Zheng; Chao Zhang; Yong Pan; Bo Huang; Tao Jiang; Zhengfeng Zhang; Changqing Li; Jian Wang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

10.  Validation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs) in the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Alpesh A Patel; Shah-Nawaz M Dodwad; Barrett S Boody; Surabhi Bhatt; Jason W Savage; Wellington K Hsu; Nan E Rothrock
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.