Literature DB >> 28798225

Ethical issues in Alzheimer's disease research involving human subjects.

Dena S Davis.   

Abstract

As we aggressively pursue research to cure and prevent Alzheimer's disease, we encounter important ethical challenges. None of these challenges, if handled thoughtfully, would pose insurmountable barriers to research. But if they are ignored, they could slow the research process, alienate potential study subjects and do damage to research recruits and others. These challenges are (1) the necessity of very large cohorts of research subjects, recruited for lengthy studies, probably ending only in the subjects' death; (2) the creation of cohorts of 'study ready' volunteers, many of whom will be competent to consent at the beginning of the process, but move into cognitive impairment later; (3) reliance on adaptive trial design, creating challenges for informed consent, equipoise and justice; (4) the use of biomarkers and predictive tests that describe risk rather than certainty, and that can threaten participants' welfare if the information is obtained by insurance companies or long-term care providers; (5) the use of study partners that creates unique risks of harm to the relationship of subject and study partner. We need greater attention, at all levels, to these complex ethical issues. Work on these issues should be included in research plans, from the federal to the local, and should be supported through NIH in the same way that it supported work on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic research. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dementia; ethics; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28798225     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.

Authors:  Nola Ries; Elise Mansfield; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 2.  Generation of defined neural populations from pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Sarah F McComish; Maeve A Caldwell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Health Outcome Prioritization in Alzheimer's Disease: Understanding the Ethical Landscape.

Authors:  Alex McKeown; Andrew Turner; Zuzanna Angehrn; Dianne Gove; Amanda Ly; Clementine Nordon; Mia Nelson; Claire Tochel; Brent Mittelstadt; Alex Keenan; Michael Smith; Ilina Singh
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia research: findings of a systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Tim G Götzelmann; Hannes Kahrass; Daniel Strech
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Telehealth Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health: A Novel Screening Tool to Support Vulnerable Patient Equity.

Authors:  Monica Gillie; Diab Ali; Diamler Vadlamuri; Kathy Jo Carstarphen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Rep       Date:  2022-02-22

6.  Ethical Implications of Alzheimer's Disease Prediction in Asymptomatic Individuals through Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Frank Ursin; Cristian Timmermann; Florian Steger
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.