Literature DB >> 31297568

Acute hydroxyurea-induced replication blockade results in replisome components disengagement from nascent DNA without causing fork collapse.

Amaia Ercilla1,2, Sonia Feu1, Sergi Aranda3, Alba Llopis1, Sólveig Hlín Brynjólfsdóttir4, Claus Storgaard Sørensen4, Luis Ignacio Toledo2, Neus Agell5.   

Abstract

During S phase, replication forks can encounter several obstacles that lead to fork stalling, which if persistent might result in fork collapse. To avoid this collapse and to preserve the competence to restart, cells have developed mechanisms that maintain fork stability upon replication stress. In this study, we aimed to understand the mechanisms involved in fork stability maintenance in non-transformed human cells by performing an isolation of proteins on nascent DNA-mass spectrometry analysis in hTERT-RPE cells under different replication stress conditions. Our results show that acute hydroxyurea-induced replication blockade causes the accumulation of large amounts of single-stranded DNA at the fork. Remarkably, this results in the disengagement of replisome components from nascent DNA without compromising fork restart. Notably, Cdc45-MCM-GINS helicase maintains its integrity and replisome components remain associated with chromatin upon acute hydroxyurea treatment, whereas replisome stability is lost upon a sustained replication stress that compromises the competence to restart.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMG; Replication fork stability; Replication stress; iPOND

Year:  2019        PMID: 31297568     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03206-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  61 in total

1.  Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases.

Authors:  Giacomo De Piccoli; Yuki Katou; Takehiko Itoh; Ryuichiro Nakato; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Karim Labib
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint.

Authors:  Tony S Byun; Marcin Pacek; Muh-ching Yee; Johannes C Walter; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM.

Authors:  Kerstin Gari; Chantal Décaillet; Mathieu Delannoy; Leonard Wu; Angelos Constantinou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks.

Authors:  Bianca M Sirbu; Frank B Couch; Jordan T Feigerle; Srividya Bhaskara; Scott W Hiebert; David Cortez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Román González-Prieto; Ana M Muñoz-Cabello; María J Cabello-Lobato; Félix Prado
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress.

Authors:  Claudia Lukas; Velibor Savic; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Carsten Doil; Beate Neumann; Ronni Sølvhøj Pedersen; Merete Grøfte; Kok Lung Chan; Ian David Hickson; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells.

Authors:  Jeanine A Harrigan; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Julia Coates; Daniela S Dimitrova; Sophie E Polo; Charles R Bradshaw; Peter Fraser; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ingegerd Elvers; Fredrik Johansson; Petra Groth; Klaus Erixon; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Break-induced replication and genome stability.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sakofsky; Sandeep Ayyar; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity.

Authors:  Marko Vujanovic; Jana Krietsch; Maria Chiara Raso; Nastassja Terraneo; Ralph Zellweger; Jonas A Schmid; Angelo Taglialatela; Jen-Wei Huang; Cory L Holland; Katharina Zwicky; Raquel Herrador; Heinz Jacobs; David Cortez; Alberto Ciccia; Lorenza Penengo; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of direct replication restart at stressed replisomes.

Authors:  Brooke A Conti; Agata Smogorzewska
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-16

2.  Kinetics of DNA Repair in Vicia faba Meristem Regeneration Following Replication Stress.

Authors:  Dorota Rybaczek; Marcelina W Musiałek; Jan Vrána; Beáta Petrovská; Ewa G Pikus; Jaroslav Doležel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Hydroxyurea and Caffeine Impact pRb-like Protein-Dependent Chromatin Architecture Profiles in Interphase Cells of Vicia faba.

Authors:  Marcelina W Musiałek; Joanna Deckert; Dorota Rybaczek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  RAD51 is a druggable target that sustains replication fork progression upon DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Sonia Feu; Fernando Unzueta; Amaia Ercilla; Alejandro Pérez-Venteo; Montserrat Jaumot; Neus Agell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Safeguarding DNA Replication: A Golden Touch of MiDAS and Other Mechanisms.

Authors:  Baraah Al Ahmad Nachar; Filippo Rosselli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Human CST complex protects stalled replication forks by directly blocking MRE11 degradation of nascent-strand DNA.

Authors:  Xinxing Lyu; Kai-Hang Lei; Pau Biak Sang; Olga Shiva; Megan Chastain; Peter Chi; Weihang Chai
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Murine polyomavirus DNA transitions through spatially distinct nuclear replication subdomains during infection.

Authors:  Douglas K Peters; Robert L Garcea
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Live Cell Microscopy of Murine Polyomavirus Subnuclear Replication Centers.

Authors:  Douglas K Peters; Kimberly D Erickson; Robert L Garcea
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 9.  Hydroxyurea-The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

Authors:  Marcelina W Musiałek; Dorota Rybaczek
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.