Literature DB >> 22325992

Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases.

Giacomo De Piccoli1, Yuki Katou, Takehiko Itoh, Ryuichiro Nakato, Katsuhiko Shirahige, Karim Labib.   

Abstract

The S phase checkpoint pathway preserves genome stability by protecting defective DNA replication forks, but the underlying mechanisms are still understood poorly. Previous work with budding yeast suggested that the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 might prevent collapse of the replisome when nucleotide concentrations are limiting, thereby allowing the subsequent resumption of DNA synthesis. Here we describe a direct analysis of replisome stability in budding yeast cells lacking checkpoint kinases, together with a high-resolution view of replisome progression across the genome. Surprisingly, we find that the replisome is stably associated with DNA replication forks following replication stress in the absence of Mec1 or Rad53. A component of the replicative DNA helicase is phosphorylated within the replisome in a Mec1-dependent manner upon replication stress, and our data indicate that checkpoint kinases control replisome function rather than stability, as part of a multifaceted response that allows cells to survive defects in chromosome replication. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22325992     DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  90 in total

1.  Keeping it together in times of stress: checkpoint function at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Theresa J Berens; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Tel1/ATM prevents degradation of replication forks that reverse after topoisomerase poisoning.

Authors:  Luca Menin; Sebastian Ursich; Camilla Trovesi; Ralph Zellweger; Massimo Lopes; Maria Pia Longhese; Michela Clerici
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Redox Chemistry in the Genome: Emergence of the [4Fe4S] Cofactor in Repair and Replication.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Barton; Rebekah M B Silva; Elizabeth O'Brien
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress: Jigsaw Falling into Place.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kotsantis; Eva Petermann; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Rad9/53BP1 protects stalled replication forks from degradation in Mec1/ATR-defective cells.

Authors:  Matteo Villa; Diego Bonetti; Massimo Carraro; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.

Authors:  David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Replisome function during replicative stress is modulated by histone h3 lysine 56 acetylation through Ctf4.

Authors:  Pierre Luciano; Pierre-Marie Dehé; Stéphane Audebert; Vincent Géli; Yves Corda
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress.

Authors:  Irina Bruck; Daniel L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Chromatin and the genome integrity network.

Authors:  Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.