| Literature DB >> 31296905 |
Maria Victoria Humbert1, Alexandra Jackson1, Christian M Orr2, Ivo Tews3, Myron Christodoulides4.
Abstract
The Gram-negative anaerobic bacteriumEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31296905 PMCID: PMC6624275 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46506-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sequence comparison of Dn-ACP with known bacterial PliC/MliC and ACP proteins. (A) Sequence alignment, secondary structure prediction and analysis. The sequences were aligned with ClustalX2 and annotated with secondary structure as predicted by Jpred4 for the two Dn-ACP domains. For comparison, the secondary structure of St-PliC and Ng-ACP is also given (PDBs 3OE3 and 6GQ4 respectively, determined by DSSP). Position of Loop 4 is highlighted by the bracket. Figure prepared using ESPrint. (B) Phylogenetic tree. FigTree was used to convert the sequence alignment to a phylogenetic tree. The PliC and MliC proteins are shown as red branches, while the ACP proteins are shown in blue. The Dn-ACP N- and C-terminal domains were aligned and are shown as green branches. Interestingly, the N-terminal ACP domain groups with other ACP proteins, while the C-terminal Dn-ACP domain more closely related to the PliC/MliC family. Ba-PliC (PDB:4ML7), St-PliC (PDB:3OE3), Nm-ACP (PDB:5MY7) and Ng-ACP (PDB:6GQ4) are shown as cartoon next to the respective branch. The reported homology models for Dn-ACP N- and C-terminal domains are also shown. (C) Homology modelling of the Dn-ACP N- and C-terminal domains. Structure models for the N- and C-terminal domains of Dn-ACP were predicted using MODELLER and are shown in dark and light green respectively. The boxed overlay highlights subtle structural differences as predicted. For comparison, known structures of Nm-ACP (PDB:5MY7, light blue, with labelled beta strands), Ng-ACP (PDB:6GQ4, blue), St-PliC (PDB:3OE3, pink) and Ba-PliC (PDB:4ML7, dark red) are shown in identical orientation. In all structures, the functional Loop 4 region has been annotated. Additionally, the site of the lysozyme binding interface determined for Ba-PliC has been indicated.
Sequence identities for ACP and MliC/PliC domains as determined from the sequence alignment shown in Fig. 1.
| Pa-MliC | 33.1 | ||||||||||
| St-PliC | 20.4 | 20.9 | |||||||||
| Ec-MliC | 25.5 | 19.4 | 65.2 | ||||||||
| Ye-MliC | 20.8 | 25.2 | 19.6 | 17 | |||||||
| Nm-ACP | 22.2 | 18.2 | 18 | 19.3 | 23.3 | ||||||
| Ng-ACP | 23.1 | 17.3 | 18 | 19.3 | 23.3 | 96.8 | |||||
| Na-ACP | 16.7 | 14.5 | 17.3 | 14.8 | 18.4 | 50.8 | 52.5 | ||||
| Cb-ACP | 22.3 | 18.1 | 13.5 | 17.6 | 14.3 | 44.8 | 45.7 | 42.4 | |||
| Ec-ACP | 17.1 | 19.6 | 15.1 | 13.5 | 14.7 | 38.8 | 37.9 | 39.8 | 41.2 | ||
| Dn-ACP-N | 16 | 15.7 | 18.1 | 16.5 | 15.3 | 34.2 | 35.1 | 35.7 | 42.9 | 35.4 | |
| Dn-ACP-C | 14.1 | 12.9 | 14.4 | 16.7 | 14.4 | 36.3 | 36.3 | 32.7 | 36.4 | 32.4 | 30.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2Homology model of Dn-MIP based on the structure of Legionella pneumophila Mip (PDB:1FD9). The dimerization domain is shown in the zoom, forming around a hydrophobic core. The dimerisation structure of Legionella template (PDB:1FD9, shown in turquoise and light blue) and D. nodosus model (shown in gold and orange) are similar overall structure with conserved secondary structure but some changes in the loops connecting secondary structure elements. While the dimer forms around a hydrophobic core, two key polar interactions stabilising the dimer are highlighted. A second zoom shows the catalytic domain in surface presentation with the electric potential mapped onto the surface (blue, positive; red, negative). The position of the inhibitor FK506, taken from the human FKBP protein (PDB:1BKF), indicates presence of the binding pocket in Dn-MIP.
Figure 3Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) on purified rDn-ACP and rDn-MIP proteins and on D. nodosus whole cells (whole-cell ELISA). ELISA reactivity of antisera from individual animals immunised with rDn-ACP or rDn-MIP delivered in Al(OH)3, Zwittergent (Zw) 3–14 detergent with or without Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPLA), liposomes with or without MPLA, Freund’s adjuvant, MONTANIDE and saponin-based vaccine adjuvant Quil-A were reacted against their corresponding immunizing antigens: (A) purified rDn-ACP or B) purified rDn-MIP protein. Murine antisera to Footvax was also reacted against both recombinant antigens (A,B). The columns represent the geometric mean reciprocal ELISA titres (n = 5 animals per group) and the error bars represent the 95% confidence limits. No significant reactivity was observed with sera from sham-immunised animals or with NMS (absorbance values ODλ450nm < 0.1 for serum dilutions of 1/10; data not shown). All same antisera to (C) rDn-ACP or (D) rDn-MIP protein were reacted in whole-cell ELISA against D. nodosus whole cells (1 µg cells/well). The columns represent the average absorbance value (ODλ450nm) (n = 5 animals per group) and the error bars represent the standard deviation (SD). Significant reactivity in comparison to the corresponding sham sera or NMS is marked with an asterisk (*) (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Antigenicity of sera from mice immunized with rDn-ACP or rDn-MIP protein delivered in different vaccine formulations tested by Western blotting. Pooled mice antisera (1/100 dilution; n = 5 animals) raised against purified (A) rDn-ACP or B) rDn-MIP protein delivered in Al(OH)3, Zwittergent (Zw) 3–14 detergent with or without Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPLA), liposomes with or without MPLA, Freund’s adjuvant, saponin-based vaccine adjuvant Quil-A and MONTANIDE, as well as antisera to Footvax and normal mouse serum (NMS) as a control, were reacted against wild type D. nodosus whole cell lysate preparation (50 μg/well or 15 μg/well, respectively) in strip Western blot. Dn-ACP and Dn-MIP proteins were specifically recognised as a single band of Mr ~25.7 kDa or ~35.6 kDa, respectively, with all murine antisera to the corresponding single antigen (identified by the arrow). Antisera to Footvax, instead, reacted against multiple proteins in the lysate. All sham immunisation sera and NMS were non-reactive. Samples were tested on strips prepared from the same western blots and processed in parallel. (C) Pooled mice antisera (1/100 dilution; n = 5 animals) raised against footrot vaccine Footvax was reacted in Western blot against purified rDn-ACP and rDn-MIP proteins (1 μg each), which were both recognized as a single band of Mr ~30.2 kDa or ~40.1 kDa, respectively (identified by the arrow). Samples were tested and processed in parallel. Images were captured on a HP ScanJet flatbed scanner. Representative full-length blots are presented (n ≥ 3 experiments for each western blot).
Figure 5Inhibitory activity of purified rDn-ACP protein on Hen egg-white lysozyme (Hewl) enzymatic function at 2 h and 24 time points in vitro. Percentage lysis of M. lysodeikticus cell suspension estimated for each condition after 2 h (Supplementary Fig. 5) and 24 h incubation. M. lysodeikticus cells alone or in the presence of 90 pmol/well of rDn-ACP, 180 pmol/well of rNm-ACP or 180 pmol/well of rDn-MIP proteins without Hewl were used as negative control conditions for lysis. The positive control sample consisted of M. lysodeikticus cells in the presence of Hewl only. The columns represent the mean (for the same n = 3 independent experiments) and the error bars represent the corresponding SEM. Data were compared with a two-sample t-Test and the asterisks (*) denote significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to the control of lysis with Hewl only.
Figure 6Effect on the levels of restored Hewl lytic activity, initially inhibited by rDn-ACP, influenced by the nature of the adjuvant used to generate antisera to rDn-ACP. Determination of percentage of M. lysodeikticus cell lysis for each test condition shown in Supplementary Fig. 7 for 2 h and 24 h incubation time points only. The columns represent the mean % lysis (from n = 3 independent experiments) and the error bars represent the corresponding SEM. Data were compared with a paired t-Test and the asterisks denote significant inhibition (P < 0.05) of rDn-ACP function by anti-rDn-ACP sera, compared to treatment without antisera, after 2 h (and continuing after 24 h incubation) (*) or after 24 h only (**).