| Literature DB >> 31287893 |
O O Babatunde1, A J Cowieson2, J W Wilson2, O Adeola1.
Abstract
Phytase is of importance to the poultry industry because of its ability to hydrolyze phytate and release phosphorus (P) for use by poultry. However, the effect of age on phytase efficacy is not fully understood. A total of 864 day-old broiler chicks were used to investigate the effect of age and feeding length on phytase efficacy using growth performance, mineral utilization, and tibia ash as response criteria of evaluation. The experiment was arranged as a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial in a randomized complete block design with 3 diets including; a positive control (PC; 0.4% non-phytate P (nPP)), a negative control (NC; 0.2% nPP) and a NC diet supplemented with phytase at 2,000 FYT/kg; 2 ages (i.e., days 14 and 22); and 2 feeding lengths (i.e., 2 and 5 D) with 8 replicates each. Birds fed the NC had decreased (P < 0.01) body weight gain and feed efficiency compared with birds fed the PC regardless of age or feeding length. Similarly, birds fed the phytase-supplemented diet had improved (P < 0.01) performance as compared to birds fed the NC regardless of age. There were no significant differences in P utilization between birds fed for 2 to 14 D or 22 D and birds fed for 5 D to both ages. However, phytase was more efficacious at day 14 than day 22 when mineral utilization was considered because the super dose of phytase elicited greater response in birds fed the phytase supplemented diet for 2 D until day 14. In contrast, percentage tibia ash improved (P < 0.01) in birds fed phytase supplemented diet for 5 D at both ages as compared with birds fed for 2 D. In conclusion, testing phytase products, even at high doses, for 2 D during the second week in the life cycle of broiler chicks, can be recommended from the results of this study.Entities:
Keywords: age; broilers; feeding length; phosphorus; phytase efficacy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31287893 PMCID: PMC8913947 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Ingredients and nutrient composition of experimental diets for broiler chickens
| Item | Positive control | Negative control | Phytase 2,000 FYT/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients, g/kg | |||
| Corn | 520.6 | 531.1 | 491.1 |
| Soybean meal, 480 g/kg CP | 358.0 | 356.0 | 356.0 |
| Soybean oil | 53.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 13.3 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Limestone | 15.3 | 19.3 | 19.3 |
| Salt | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Vitamin−mineral premix | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| DL-Methionine | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| L-Lysine·HCl | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| L-Threonine | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Chromic oxide premix | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Phytase premix | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| Total | 1000.0 | 1000.0 | 1000.0 |
| Calculated nutrients and energy, g/kg | |||
| CP | 225.3 | 225.3 | 225.3 |
| ME, kcal/kg | 3222.5 | 3228.8 | 3228.8 |
| Ca | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| P | 6.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Non-phytate P | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Analyzed nutrients, g/kg | |||
| DM | 890 | 884 | 887 |
| Ca | 13 | 12.5 | 12.6 |
| Total P | 6.4 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Phytate P | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
| Phytase activity, FYT/kg | <100 | <100 | 2210 |
Supplied the following quantities per kg of diet: vitamin A, 5,484 IU; vitamin D3, 2,643 ICU; vitamin E, 11 IU; menadione sodium bisulfite,4.38 mg; riboflavin, 5.49 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 11 mg; niacin, 44.1 mg; choline chloride, 771 mg; vitamin B12, 13.2 μg; biotin, 55.2 μg; thiamine mononitrate, 2.2 mg; folic acid, 990 μg; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 3.3 mg; I, 1.11 mg; Mn, 66.06 mg; Cu, 4.44 mg; Fe, 44.1 mg; Zn, 44.1 mg; Se, 300 μg.
Prepared as 1 g chromic oxide added to 4 g corn.
Prepared with ground corn to contain 50 FYT per g corn.
Effect of phytase, age, and feeding length on growth performance and tibia ash percentage in broiler chickens
| Age, D | Feeding length, day | Diet | Final BW (g) | BW gain, g/bird | Feed intake, g/bird | G:F, g/kg | Tibia ash, % | Number of replicates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 2 (days 12 to 14) | PC | 442 | 103 | 133 | 770 | 47.7 | 8 |
| 14 | 2 (days 12 to 14) | NC | 424 | 84 | 122 | 689 | 45.2 | 8 |
| 14 | 2 (days 12 to 14) | 2,000 | 437 | 97 | 128 | 762 | 46.7 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (days 9 to 14) | PC | 456 | 233 | 285 | 816 | 46.2 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (days 9 to 14) | NC | 423 | 200 | 268 | 741 | 41.3 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (days 9 to 14) | 2,000 | 446 | 223 | 276 | 808 | 46.0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | PC | 993 | 143 | 217 | 659 | 50.9 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | NC | 976 | 127 | 211 | 599 | 48.7 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | 2,000 | 991 | 142 | 210 | 676 | 50.0 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (days 17 to 22) | PC | 1,013 | 376 | 529 | 711 | 50.9 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (days 17 to 22) | NC | 957 | 313 | 491 | 639 | 46.2 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (days 17 to 22) | 2,000 | 996 | 358 | 501 | 715 | 49.5 | 8 |
| PC | 726 | 214 | 291 | 739 | 49 | 32 | ||
| NC | 695 | 180 | 273 | 667 | 45 | 32 | ||
| 2,000 | 718 | 205 | 279 | 740 | 48 | 32 | ||
| 14 | 438 | 157 | 202 | 764 | 46 | 48 | ||
| 22 | 988 | 243 | 360 | 666 | 49 | 48 | ||
| 2 | 710 | 116 | 170 | 692 | 48 | 48 | ||
| 5 | 715 | 284 | 392 | 738 | 47 | 48 | ||
| 2 | PC | 718 | 123 | 175 | 714 | 49 | 16 | |
| 2 | NC | 700 | 105 | 167 | 644 | 47 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2,000 | 714 | 119 | 169 | 719 | 48 | 16 | |
| 5 | PC | 734 | 304 | 407 | 764 | 49 | 16 | |
| 5 | NC | 690 | 256 | 380 | 690 | 44 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2,000 | 721 | 291 | 389 | 761 | 48 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2 | 434 | 95 | 128 | 740 | 47 | 24 | |
| 14 | 5 | 442 | 219 | 276 | 789 | 44 | 24 | |
| 22 | 2 | 986 | 137 | 213 | 644 | 50 | 24 | |
| 22 | 5 | 989 | 349 | 507 | 688 | 49 | 24 | |
| Diet | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Age | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Feeding length | 0.29 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Diet × Age | 0.57 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 0.72 | |||
| Diet × Feeding length | 0.06 | <0.01 | 0.05 | 0.96 | 0.02 | |||
| Age × Feeding Length | 0.56 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.83 | 0.22 | |||
| Diet × Age × Feeding length | 0.56 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.94 | 0.80 | |||
| PC vs. NC | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| NC vs. 2,000 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.14 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Days 12 to 14 vs. 9 to 14 | 0.25 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Days 20 to 22 vs. 17 to 22 | 0.73 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.09 | |||
| Days 12 to 14 vs. 20 to 22 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Days 9 to 14 vs. 17 to 22 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
PC = positive control; NC = negative control; 2,000 = NC + 2,000 phytase units/kg; G:F = gain to feed ratio.
Effect of phytase, age, and feeding length on nutrient digestibility and retention responses of broiler chickens
| Age, D | Feeding length, day | Diet | AID | AID P, % | AID Ca, % | TTR | TTR P, % | TTR Ca, % | Number of replicates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 2 (days 12 to 14) | PC | 72.0 | 56.0 | 58.2 | 66.5 | 50.1 | 44.7 | 8 |
| 14 | 2 (days 12 to 14) | NC | 70.0 | 45.7 | 46.0 | 65.8 | 35.1 | 27.0 | 8 |
| 14 | 2 (days 12 to 14) | 2,000 | 71.3 | 69.6 | 62.9 | 69.3 | 58.2 | 42.6 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (days 9 to 14) | PC | 70.2 | 55.0 | 59.6 | 70.0 | 54.9 | 45.0 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (days 9 to 14) | NC | 69.2 | 47.3 | 52.3 | 69.5 | 46.4 | 24.4 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (days 9 to 14) | 2,000 | 71.2 | 65.2 | 62.7 | 70.3 | 63.0 | 36.9 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | PC | 70.7 | 54.4 | 50.4 | 69.6 | 48.9 | 46.2 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | NC | 69.7 | 48.5 | 44.7 | 69.6 | 37.5 | 28.6 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | 2,000 | 72.0 | 67.3 | 54.5 | 71.3 | 58.3 | 45.0 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (days 17 to 22) | PC | 71.1 | 58.3 | 57.5 | 71.4 | 51.8 | 45.5 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (days 17 to 22) | NC | 70.2 | 48.8 | 49.0 | 71.3 | 43.7 | 29.0 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (days 17 to 22) | 2,000 | 72.8 | 66.4 | 56.1 | 73.2 | 63.5 | 40.2 | 8 |
| PC | 71.0 | 55.9 | 56.4 | 69.40 | 51.4 | 45.4 | 32 | ||
| NC | 69.8 | 47.5 | 48.0 | 69.1 | 40.6 | 27.2 | 32 | ||
| 2,000 | 71.8 | 67.1 | 59.0 | 71.0 | 60.8 | 41.1 | 32 | ||
| 14 | 70.6 | 56.4 | 57.0 | 68.6 | 51.3 | 36.7 | 48 | ||
| 22 | 71.1 | 57.3 | 52.0 | 71.1 | 50.6 | 39.1 | 48 | ||
| 2 | 71.0 | 57.0 | 52.8 | 68.7 | 48.0 | 39.0 | 48 | ||
| 5 | 70.8 | 56.8 | 56.2 | 71.0 | 53.9 | 36.8 | 48 | ||
| 14 | 2 | 71.1 | 57.1 | 55.7 | 67.2 | 47.8 | 38.1 | 24 | |
| 14 | 5 | 70.1 | 55.8 | 58.2 | 70.0 | 54.8 | 35.4 | 24 | |
| 22 | 2 | 70.8 | 56.7 | 49.9 | 70.2 | 48.2 | 40.0 | 24 | |
| 22 | 5 | 71.3 | 57.8 | 54.2 | 72.0 | 53.0 | 38.2 | 24 | |
| Diet | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Age | 0.25 | 0.51 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.47 | 0.17 | |||
| Feeding Length | 0.66 | 0.95 | 0.04 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.20 | |||
| Diet × Age | 0.39 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.90 | 0.51 | 0.86 | |||
| Diet × Feeding length | 0.60 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.07 | 0.45 | |||
| Age × Feeding length | 0.06 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.77 | |||
| Diet × Age × Feeding length | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.89 | |||
| PC vs. NC | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.63 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| NC vs. 2,000 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
| Days 12 to 14 vs. 9 to 14 | 0.11 | 0.47 | 0.27 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.27 | |||
| Days 20 to 22 vs. 17 to 22 | 0.31 | 0.52 | 0.06 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.48 | |||
| Days 12 to 14 vs. 20 to 22 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.73 | 0.44 | |||
| Days 9 to 14 vs. 17 to 22 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.08 | <0.01 | 0.18 | 0.24 |
AID = apparent ileal digestibility; TTR = total tract retention; DM = dry matter; P = phosphorus; Ca = calcium.
PC = positive control; NC = negative control; 2,000 = NC + 2,000 phytase units/kg.
Effect of age and feeding length on phytase efficacy in mineral utilization and tibia ash of broiler chickens1
| Age, D | Feeding length, day | AID | AID Ca, % | TTR | TTR Ca, % | Tibia Ash, % | Number of replicates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 2 (Days 12 to 14) | 23.94 | 16.87 | 23.15 | 15.57 | 1.5 | 8 |
| 14 | 5 (Days 9 to 14) | 17.95 | 10.32 | 16.68 | 12.49 | 4.8 | 8 |
| 22 | 2 (days 20 to 22) | 18.85 | 9.84 | 20.89 | 16.34 | 1.3 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 (Days 17 to 22) | 17.67 | 7.09 | 19.85 | 11.25 | 3.4 | 8 |
| 14 | 20.95 | 13.60 | 19.92 | 14.03 | 3.1 | 16 | |
| 22 | 18.26 | 8.46 | 20.37 | 13.79 | 2.3 | 16 | |
| 2 | 21.40 | 13.35 | 22.02 | 15.95 | 1.4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 17.81 | 8.71 | 18.27 | 11.87 | 4.1 | 16 | |
| Age | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.45 | ||
| Feeding length | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.02 | ||
| Age × Feeding length | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.17 | 0.83 | 0.60 | ||
| Days 12 to 14 vs. 9 to 14 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.63 | 0.04 | ||
| Days 20 to 22 vs. 17 to 22 | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.43 | 0.17 | ||
| Days 12 to 14 vs. 20 to 22 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 0.91 | 0.87 | ||
| Days 9 to 14 vs. 17 to 22 | 0.95 | 0.46 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.37 |
3 Phytase 2,000 = NC + 2,000 phytase units/kg.
Data were obtained by subtracting responses of birds on NC diet from responses of birds on NC + 2,000 FYT/kg phytase supplemented diets in each of 8 blocks of cages.
AID = apparent ileal digestibility, TTR = total tract retention.
Figure 1Plasma Myo -inositol (MYO) concentrations of broiler chickens fed PC (positive control), NC (negative control), and phytase (2,000 FTY/kg) supplemented NC diet. Panel A represents age day 14 when fed for 2 or 5 D from days 12 to 14 or days 9 to 14 of age. Panel B represents age 22 D when fed 2 or 5 D from days 20 to 22 or days 17 to 22. Each point represents a mean of 8 observations.