| Literature DB >> 31285454 |
Win M Tun1, Choon Hwai Yap2, Shier Nee Saw2, Joanna L James3, Alys R Clark4.
Abstract
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) affects 5-10% of pregnancies, leading to clinically significant fetal morbidity and mortality. FGR placentae frequently exhibit poor vascular branching, but the mechanisms driving this are poorly understood. We hypothesize that vascular structural malformation at the organ level alters microvascular shear stress, impairing angiogenesis. A computational model of placental vasculature predicted elevated placental micro-vascular shear stress in FGR placentae (0.2 Pa in severe FGR vs 0.05 Pa in normal placentae). Endothelial cells cultured under predicted FGR shear stresses migrated significantly slower and with greater persistence than in shear stresses predicted in normal placentae. These cell behaviors suggest a dominance of vessel elongation over branching. Taken together, these results suggest (1) poor vascular development increases vessel shear stress, (2) increased shear stress induces cell behaviors that impair capillary branching angiogenesis, and (3) impaired branching angiogenesis continues to drive elevated shear stress, jeopardizing further vascular formation. Inadequate vascular branching early in gestation could kick off this cyclic loop and continue to negatively impact placental angiogenesis throughout gestation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31285454 PMCID: PMC6614400 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46151-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) A schematic diagram illustrating computational model generation for pre-capillary placental vascular branches. The placental volume is seeded with a fixed density of points, and tree structures are grown toward these points. Sparser seed points result in a sparser vascular tree. (b) A schematic diagram of capillary loops that reside distal to intermediate villi and are simplified in the model as a lumped structure. In normal placentae capillary branching is denser than that in FGR placenta.
Figure 2Side (a,c) and top (b,d) views of the normal and FGR placental models (pre-capillary level). Normal placentae have an abundant vascular network, whereas FGR placentae are smaller with a sparser vascular network. (e) Box and whisker plot showing the median, range and interquartile range of predicted placental capillary shear stress from normal and FGR models. Outlier data points are identified as gray crosses (‘+’).
Figure 3Bar graphs showing the mean migration speed of HUVECs (a) and HMEC-1 (b) under shear stress of normal (0.05 Pa) and FGR conditions (0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 Pa). Error bars represent the standard error (* and ** show statistical significance, *p = 0.01, **p < 0.0001). Line graphs showing the persistency of HUVECs (no significant differences) (c) and HMEC-1 (0.05 Pa and 0.1 Pa are significantly less persistent than 0.15 and 0.2 Pa, p < 0.001) (d) under shear stress. Bar graphs showing the proportion of HUVECs (e) and HMEC-1 (f) that incorporated BrdU over a 4 hr period.
Parameters used to generate normal and pathological placental hemodynamic models.
| Parameter | Normal | Mild FGR | Moderate FGR | Severe FGR | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placental volume, | 428 cm3 | ↓35% | ↓35% | 35% |
[ |
| Placental thickness, | 20 mm | ↓ 25% | ↓25% | ↓25% |
[ |
| Number of villous trees, | 70 | ↓45% | ↓45% | ↓45% |
[ |
| Vascular seed point density | 75/cm3 | ↓10% | ↓10% | ↓10% |
[ |
| Number of capillaries per terminal villous, | 6 | As normal | ↓33% | ↓50% |
[ |
| Umbilical artery radius | 2 mm | ↓20% | ↓20% | ↓20% |
[ |
| Umbilical vein radius | 4 mm | ↓20% | ↓20% | ↓20% |
[ |