| Literature DB >> 34062108 |
W M Tun1, G Poologasundarampillai2, H Bischof3,4, G Nye5, O N F King1, M Basham1,6, Y Tokudome7, R M Lewis8, E D Johnstone3,4, P Brownbill3,4, M Darrow9, I L Chernyavsky3,4,10.
Abstract
Multi-scale structural assessment of biological soft tissue is challenging but essential to gain insight into structure-function relationships of tissue/organ. Using the human placenta as an example, this study brings together sophisticated sample preparation protocols, advanced imaging and robust, validated machine-learning segmentation techniques to provide the first massively multi-scale and multi-domain information that enables detailed morphological and functional analyses of both maternal and fetal placental domains. Finally, we quantify the scale-dependent error in morphological metrics of heterogeneous placental tissue, estimating the minimal tissue scale needed in extracting meaningful biological data. The developed protocol is beneficial for high-throughput investigation of structure-function relationships in both normal and diseased placentas, allowing us to optimize therapeutic approaches for pathological pregnancies. In addition, the methodology presented is applicable in the characterization of tissue architecture and physiological behaviours of other complex organs with similarity to the placenta, where an exchange barrier possesses circulating vascular and avascular fluid spaces.Entities:
Keywords: computed tomography; contrast agent; flow network; human placenta; machine-learning segmentation; spatial statistics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34062108 PMCID: PMC8169212 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J R Soc Interface ISSN: 1742-5662 Impact factor: 4.118
Figure 1Multi-scale tissue architecture of placental tissue from synchrotron micro-CT. (a) Placental cast under micro-CT (unpublished image from [5]). (b–g) Images demonstrating the complex hierarchical architecture of the human placenta (Specimen 1, normal placenta at term). (b) Three-dimensional rendering of approximately 8 mm3 human placental tissue. (c) Fetal vascular network segmented from placental tissue using a U-Net algorithm. (d–f) A small section of the placental tissue was cropped from the original dataset (red box in b) and 3D rendered. (d) Three-dimensional rendering of approximately 0.2 mm3 tissue showing different hierarchical features. (e) U-Net segmented fetal tissue component, (f) fetal vessels and (g) fetal capillary network with surrounding villous tissue overlaid.
Figure 2Three-dimensional analysis of the structure of the fetal vascular network and maternal porous space (Specimen 1, normal placenta at term). (a,b) Skeletonized vascular structure from the entire tissue volume and from a small cropped region (the red box in a). (c) A single connected vascular tree in the cropped region shown in (b). (d,e) Distributions of vessel diameter and length of blood vessels from the entire fetal vascular network and the connected vascular tree shown in (a) and (c), respectively. (f) Porous regions in the central tissue region (approx. 1.8 mm3). The colours represent different porous regions but are not related to the sizes of the pores. (g) Ball and stick model to represent pores and throats in the cropped region as in (c). (h,i) Distributions of diameters of porous regions and connecting throats in the central tissue region and the region that encompasses the single connected tree in (c).
Figure 3Flow simulations across maternal IVS to visualize the inter-relationship between maternal blood flow and fetal vascular flow (Specimen 1, normal placenta at term). (a) The maternal (i) flow velocity map and (ii) flow streamlines in the IVS. (b,c) The inter-relationship of maternal flow streamlines and fetal blood vascular network. (d) Line graphs comparing the maternal blood flow velocity distributions in three different directions with a fixed pressure gradient. The x-axis of the graph shows maternal blood flow velocity and y-axis shows the normalized frequency in logarithmic values.
Figure 4Uncertainty quantification and scale-dependence of morphological metrics (Specimens 1 and 2). (a) Fluctuations of placental villous tissue area fraction in Specimen 2 for the ROI with a volume of approximately 1.22 × 1.22 × 1.22 mm3 (insets illustrate selected slices). (b) Volume fraction fluctuations (mean ± s.d.) versus effective ROI size. (c) Scale-dependence of a relative error in the tissue volume fraction (ϕ) and specific surface area (S) estimates; the inset compares to the theoretical prediction of ∼(ROI volume)1/2 on a logarithmic scale (see electronic supplementary material, S9). (d) Radial two-point autocorrelation function (mean; s.d. is shown with shaded lines); the corresponding approximate transition range to uncorrelated mesoscale (mean autocorrelation ≲1%) is shown as a grey stripe in (c).
Comparison of 2D- and 3D-based placental tissue morphometrics (Specimen 2; see electronic supplementary material, figures S7 and S8 for more details). n.a. indicates the technique is not applicable.
| structural metric | 2D stereology (mean ± s.d.) | 3D micro-CT |
|---|---|---|
| volume fractiona | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.65 |
| slice-averaged area fractionb | n.a. | 0.65 ± 0.03 |
| specific surface area ( | 0.028 ± 0.006 (range: 0.017–0.037) | 0.045 |
| characteristic correlation lengthscale ( | n.a. | ≈200 |
aBased on the 2D ROI area of approximately 1.46 × 1.46 mm2.
bBased on the central ROI volume of approximately 1.22 × 1.22 × 1.22 mm3.
cBased on the ROI area of approximately 0.44 × 0.44 mm2.
dThe distance at which the mean of normalized autocorrelation function falls below 1%.