Literature DB >> 31285206

A Nationwide Flash-Mob Study for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Angel M R Schols1, Robert T A Willemsen1, Tobias N Bonten2, Martijn H Rutten3, Patricia M Stassen4, Bas L J H Kietselaer5, Geert-Jan Dinant1, Jochen W L Cals6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our primary objective was to evaluate the Marburg Heart Score (MHS), a clinical decision rule, or to develop an adapted clinical decision rule for family physicians (FPs) to safely rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients referred to secondary care for suspected ACS. The secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of using the flash-mob method, an innovative study design, for large-scale research in family medicine.
METHODS: In this 2-week, nationwide, prospective, observational, flash-mob study, FPs collected data on possible ACS predictors and assessed ACS probability (on a scale of 1-10) in patients referred to secondary care for suspected ACS.
RESULTS: We collected data for 258 patients in 2 weeks by mobilizing approximately 1 in 5 FPs throughout the country via ambassadors. A final diagnosis was obtained for 243 patients (94.2%), of whom 45 (18.5%) received a diagnosis of ACS. Sex, sex-adjusted age, and ischemic changes on electrocardiography were significantly associated with ACS. The sensitivity of the MHS (cut-off ≤2) was 75.0%, specificity was 44.0%, positive predictive value was 24.3%, and negative predictive value was 88.0%. For the FP assessment (cut-off ≤5), these test characteristics were 86.7%, 41.4%, 25.2%, and 93.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients referred to emergency care, ACS could not be safely ruled out using the MHS or FP clinical assessment. The flash-mob study design may be a feasible alternative research method to investigate relatively simple, clinically relevant research questions in family medicine on a large scale and over a relatively short time frame.
© 2019 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; clinical decision rule; family medicine; flash mob research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31285206      PMCID: PMC6827655          DOI: 10.1370/afm.2401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  18 in total

1.  Health care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Chris van Weel; Henk Schers; Arno Timmermans
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Jörg Haasenritter; Stefan Bösner; Paul Vaucher; Lilli Herzig; Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Structured Clinical Decision Aids Are Seldom Compared With Subjective Physician Judgment, and Are Seldom Superior.

Authors:  David L Schriger; Joshua W Elder; Richelle J Cooper
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.

Authors:  B E Backus; A J Six; J C Kelder; M A R Bosschaert; E G Mast; A Mosterd; R F Veldkamp; A J Wardeh; R Tio; R Braam; S H J Monnink; R van Tooren; T P Mast; F van den Akker; M J M Cramer; J M Poldervaart; A W Hoes; P A Doevendans
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Accuracy of symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease assessed in primary care.

Authors:  Stefan Bösner; Annette Becker; Maren Abu Hani; Heidi Keller; Andreas C Sönnichsen; Jörg Haasenritter; Konstantinos Karatolios; Juergen R Schaefer; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome in primary care: comparison of the physicians' risk estimation and a clinical decision rule.

Authors:  M H E Bruins Slot; F H Rutten; G J M G van der Heijden; G J Geersing; J F C Glatz; A W Hoes
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care: development and validation of a simple prediction rule.

Authors:  Stefan Bösner; Jörg Haasenritter; Annette Becker; Konstantinos Karatolios; Paul Vaucher; Baris Gencer; Lilli Herzig; Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner; Juergen R Schaefer; Maren Abu Hani; Heidi Keller; Andreas C Sönnichsen; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score.

Authors:  Barbra E Backus; A Jacob Six; Johannes C Kelder; Thomas P Mast; Frederieke van den Akker; E Gijis Mast; Stefan H J Monnink; Rob M van Tooren; Pieter A F M Doevendans
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2010-09

9.  Chest pain and ischaemic heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  S Nilsson; M Scheike; D Engblom; L G Karlsson; S Mölstad; I Akerlind; K Ortoft; E Nylander
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  The Power of Flash Mob Research: Conducting a Nationwide Observational Clinical Study on Capillary Refill Time in a Single Day.

Authors:  Jelmer Alsma; Jan L C M van Saase; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; W E M Ineke Schouten; Anique Baten; Martijn P Bauer; Frits Holleman; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Patricia M Stassen; Karin H A H Kaasjager; Harm R Haak; Frank H Bosch; Stephanie C E Schuit
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Next Generation of Connectivity in Family Medicine Research.

Authors:  Mohammed A Rashid; Larry A Green
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Performance of a simplified HEART score and HEART-GP score for evaluating chest pain in urgent primary care.

Authors:  R E Harskamp; M Kleton; I H Smits; A Manten; J C L Himmelreich; H C P M van Weert; R P Rietveld; W A M Lucassen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Prehospital risk assessment in patients suspected of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jesse P A Demandt; Jo M Zelis; Arjan Koks; Geert H J M Smits; Pim van der Harst; Pim A L Tonino; Lukas R C Dekker; Marcel van Het Veer; Pieter-Jan Vlaar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Performance of risk scores for coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study of patients with chest pain in urgent primary care.

Authors:  Michelle Kleton; Amy Manten; Iris Smits; Remco Rietveld; Wim A M Lucassen; Ralf E Harskamp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Trends in Use and Perceptions About Triplet Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sietske C van Nassau; Marinde J Bond; Ilva Scheerman; Jesper van Breeschoten; Rob Kessels; Liselot B Valkenburg-van Iersel; Henk M Verheul; Tineke E Buffart; Leonie J Mekenkamp; Valery E Lemmens; Miriam Koopman; Guus M Bol
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.