BACKGROUND: Diagnosing the aetiology of chest pain is challenging. There is still a lack of data on the diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms for acute coronary events in low-prevalence settings. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs in patients presenting to general practice with chest pain. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional diagnostic study with delayed-type reference standard. SETTING: Seventy-four general practices in Germany. METHOD: The study included 1249 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain. Data were reviewed by an independent reference panel, with coronary heart disease (CHD) and an indication for urgent hospital admission as reference conditions. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, predictive value, and odds ratio (OR) for non-trauma patients with a reference diagnosis. RESULTS: Several signs and symptoms showed strong associations with CHD, including known vascular disease (OR = 5.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.83 to 9.30), pain worse on exercise (OR = 4.27; 95% CI = 2.31 to 7.88), patient assumes cardiac origin of pain (OR = 3.20; 95% CI = 1.53 to 6.60), cough present (OR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.77), and pain reproducible on palpation (OR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.56). For urgent hospital admission, effective criteria included pain radiating to the left arm (OR = 8.81; 95% CI = 2.58 to 30.05), known clinical vascular disease (OR = 7.50; 95% CI = 2.88 to 19.55), home visit requested (OR = 7.31; 95% CI = 2.27 to 23.57), and known heart failure (OR = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.14 to 10.96). CONCLUSION: Although individual criteria were only moderately effective, in combination they can help to decide about further management of patients with chest pain in primary care.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing the aetiology of chest pain is challenging. There is still a lack of data on the diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms for acute coronary events in low-prevalence settings. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs in patients presenting to general practice with chest pain. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional diagnostic study with delayed-type reference standard. SETTING: Seventy-four general practices in Germany. METHOD: The study included 1249 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain. Data were reviewed by an independent reference panel, with coronary heart disease (CHD) and an indication for urgent hospital admission as reference conditions. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, predictive value, and odds ratio (OR) for non-traumapatients with a reference diagnosis. RESULTS: Several signs and symptoms showed strong associations with CHD, including known vascular disease (OR = 5.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.83 to 9.30), pain worse on exercise (OR = 4.27; 95% CI = 2.31 to 7.88), patient assumes cardiac origin of pain (OR = 3.20; 95% CI = 1.53 to 6.60), cough present (OR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.77), and pain reproducible on palpation (OR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.56). For urgent hospital admission, effective criteria included pain radiating to the left arm (OR = 8.81; 95% CI = 2.58 to 30.05), known clinical vascular disease (OR = 7.50; 95% CI = 2.88 to 19.55), home visit requested (OR = 7.31; 95% CI = 2.27 to 23.57), and known heart failure (OR = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.14 to 10.96). CONCLUSION: Although individual criteria were only moderately effective, in combination they can help to decide about further management of patients with chest pain in primary care.
Authors: S Nilsson; M Scheike; D Engblom; L G Karlsson; S Mölstad; I Akerlind; K Ortoft; E Nylander Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: François Verdon; Lilli Herzig; Bernard Burnand; Thomas Bischoff; Alain Pécoud; Michel Junod; Nicole Mühlemann; Bernard Favrat Journal: Swiss Med Wkly Date: 2008-06-14 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Angel M R Schols; Robert T A Willemsen; Tobias N Bonten; Martijn H Rutten; Patricia M Stassen; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Geert-Jan Dinant; Jochen W L Cals Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jörg Haasenritter; Marc Aerts; Stefan Bösner; Frank Buntinx; Bernard Burnand; Lilli Herzig; J André Knottnerus; Girma Minalu; Staffan Nilsson; Walter Renier; Carol Sox; Harold Sox; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Oliver Hirsch; Stefan Bösner; Eyke Hüllermeier; Robin Senge; Krzysztof Dembczynski; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Alexandre Ronga; Paul Vaucher; Jörg Haasenritter; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Stefan Bösner; François Verdon; Thomas Bischoff; Bernard Burnand; Bernard Favrat; Lilli Herzig Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Staffan Nilsson; Per O Andersson; Lars Borgquist; Ewa Grodzinsky; Magnus Janzon; Magnus Kvick; Eva Landberg; Håkan Nilsson; Jan-Erik Karlsson Journal: Int J Family Med Date: 2013-01-10