Literature DB >> 33405015

Performance of a simplified HEART score and HEART-GP score for evaluating chest pain in urgent primary care.

R E Harskamp1,2, M Kleton3, I H Smits3, A Manten3, J C L Himmelreich3, H C P M van Weert3, R P Rietveld4,5, W A M Lucassen3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a common symptom in urgent primary care. The distinction between urgent and non-urgent causes can be challenging. A modified version of the HEART score, in which troponin is omitted ('simplified HEART') or replaced by the so-called 'sense of alarm' (HEART-GP), may aid in risk stratification.
METHOD: This study involved a retrospective, observational cohort of consecutive patients evaluated for chest pain at a large-scale, out-of-hours, regional primary care facility in the Netherlands, with 6‑week follow-up for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The outcome of interest is diagnostic accuracy, including positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
RESULTS: We included 664 patients; MACEs occurred in 4.8% (n = 32). For  simplified HEART and HEART-GP, we found C‑statistics of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.91) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95), respectively. Optimal diagnostic accuracy was found for a simplified HEART score ≥2 (PPV 9%, NPV 99.7%), HEART-GP score ≥3 (PPV 11%, NPV 99.7%) and HEART-GP score ≥4 (PPV 16%, NPV 99.4%). Physicians referred 157 patients (23.6%) and missed 6 MACEs. A simplified HEART score ≥2 would have picked up 5 cases, at the expense of 332 referrals (50.0%, p < 0.001). A HEART-GP score of ≥3 and ≥4 would have detected 5 and 3 MACEs and led to 293 (44.1%, p < 0.001) and 186 (28.0%, p = 0.18) referrals, respectively.
CONCLUSION: HEART-score modifications including the physicians' 'sense of alarm' may be used as a risk stratification tool for chest pain in primary care in the absence of routine access to troponin assays. Further validation is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest pain; HEART score; Major adverse cardiac events; Primary care

Year:  2021        PMID: 33405015     DOI: 10.1007/s12471-020-01529-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of chest pain in primary care patients.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.292

2.  A Nationwide Flash-Mob Study for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Angel M R Schols; Robert T A Willemsen; Tobias N Bonten; Martijn H Rutten; Patricia M Stassen; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Geert-Jan Dinant; Jochen W L Cals
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Outpatient diagnosis of acute chest pain in adults.

Authors:  John R McConaghy; Rupal S Oza
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Chest pain and ischaemic heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  S Nilsson; M Scheike; D Engblom; L G Karlsson; S Mölstad; I Akerlind; K Ortoft; E Nylander
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The conundrum of acute chest pain in general practice: a nationwide survey in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Ralf Harskamp; Petra van Peet; Jettie Bont; Suzanne Ligthart; Wim Lucassen; Henk van Weert
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-11-28

6.  Rationale and design of a cohort study evaluating triage of acute chest pain in out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands (TRACE).

Authors:  Amy Manten; Cuny J J Cuijpers; Remco Rietveld; Emma Groot; Freek van de Graaf; Sandra Voerman; Jelle C L Himmelreich; Wim A M Lucassen; Henk C P M van Weert; Ralf E Harskamp
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.458

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Chest pain triage: gut feeling or protocol-based care?

Authors:  R T A Willemsen; A W J van 't Hof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.380

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.