| Literature DB >> 31281720 |
Abstract
Oxygen is crucial to maintain the homeostasis in aerobic cells. Hypoxia is a condition in which cells are deprived of the oxygen supply necessary for their optimum performance. Whereas oxygen deprivation may occur in normal physiological processes, hypoxia is frequently associated with pathological conditions. It has been identified as a stressor in the tumor microenvironment, acting as a key mediator of cancer development. Numerous pathways are activated in hypoxic cells that affect cell signaling and gene regulation to promote the survival of these cells by stimulating angiogenesis, switching cellular metabolism, slowing their growth rate, and preventing apoptosis. The induction of dysregulated metabolism in cancer cells by hypoxia results in aggressive tumor phenotypes that are characterized by rapid progression, treatment resistance, and poor prognosis. A non-invasive assessment of hypoxia-induced metabolic and architectural changes in tumors is advisable to fully improve breast cancer (BC) patient management, by potentially reducing the need for invasive biopsy procedures and evaluating tumor response to treatment. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular changes in breast tumors secondary to hypoxia and the non-invasive imaging alternatives to evaluate oxygen deprivation, with an emphasis on their application in BC and the advantages and limitations of the currently available techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Hypoxia; Molecular imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 31281720 PMCID: PMC6597408 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Breast Cancer ISSN: 1738-6756 Impact factor: 3.588
Figure 1Diagram of the effects of hypoxia in tumor cells.
GLUT = glucose transporter; ROS = teactive oxygen species; Bcl-2 = B-cell lymphoma 2; EPO = erythropoietin; IL = interleukin; PG = prostaglandin; TAMS = tumor-associated macrophages; VEGF = vascular endotelial growth factor; uPAR = urokinase plasminogen activator receptor; HIF = hypoxia-inducible factor; BRCA 1/2 = breast cancer genes; PTEN = phosphatase and tensin homolog; AKT = protein kinase B; MSH 2 = mutS protein homolog 2; MLH 1 = mutL homolog 1.
Non-invasive imaging methods to measure hypoxia
| Technique | Reporter | Infomation of hypoxia | Mechanism | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radioisotope techniques | ||||||
| PET | Tracers labeled with radioisotopes, usually 18F, 11C, 67Cu | Indirectly/tissue | • Tracers are trapped in hypoxic cells and get accumulated | • Macroscopic scale assessment of the tumor | • Ionizing radiation | |
| • Images are formed from gamma-rays directly emitted from radionuclides in SPECT and after annihilation in PET | • High sensitivity | • Perfusion dependant | ||||
| • Over time assessment of hypoxia | • Low spatial resolution | |||||
| • Short half-life radiotracers needed | ||||||
| • Waste disposal | ||||||
| SPECT | Gamma-emitting radioisotopes | • Less agents available than PET | ||||
| • Less spatial resolution | ||||||
| Resonance techniques | ||||||
| DCE MRI | Gadolinium based contrast agents | Indirectly/intravascular-tissue | Contrast enhancement | • Over time assessment of hypoxia | • Perfusion dependent | |
| • Qualitative approach | ||||||
| BOLD MRI | deoxyHb as a endogenous marker | Directly/intravascular | Difference in relaxivity of oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin | • Short acquisition times | • Flow and perfusion dependant | |
| • High spatial and temporal resolution | • Susceptible to motion artefacts | |||||
| • Hyperoxic gas challenge and over time hypoxia assessment | • Voxel based measurements | |||||
| • qBOLD quantitavive maps of pO2 | ||||||
| TOLD MRI | Tissue water O2 as a endogenous marker | Directly/tissue | Longitudinal relaxation of time of O2 Tissue water | • Hyperoxic gas challenge and over time hypoxia assessment | • Susceptible to motion artefacts | |
| • Short adquisition times | • Throughput is quite modest | |||||
| • Independent of perfusion | ||||||
| 19F MR oximetry | Fluorinate probes | Indirectly/tissue | Relaxation rate of fluorinate probes accumulated in macrophages in presence of oxygen | • Quantitative pO2 measurements | • Susceptible to flow artefacts | |
| • High sensitivity | • Low availability | |||||
| • Correlates good with pO2 | • Dependent of the concentration of disolved O2 | |||||
| • No tissue background signal | ||||||
| • Response to hyperoxic challenges | ||||||
| MRS | Lactate as a endogenous marker | Directly/tissue | Different frequencies of resonation depending of molecular environment in a magnetic field | • Quantitative determination of hypoxia through metabolites | • Time consuming | |
| • Water signal suppression essential | ||||||
| • Voxel dependent | ||||||
| EPR/ESR | Inyection of paramagnetic probe | Indirectly/tissue | Interaction of unpaired electrones of O2 with paramagnetic probe and change in T2 relaxation rate | • Quantitative assessment of pO2 | • Lack of equipment | |
| • Hyperoxic gas challenge and overtime assessment of hypoxia | • Probe concentration dependent | |||||
| OMRI | Hyperpolarized probes for oximetry | Indirectly/tissue | Change of relaxivity due to reactive oxygen species with excitation of an exogenous radical | • High sensitivity also with low pO2 concentrations | • High cost | |
| • Low resolution | ||||||
| Optical techniques | ||||||
| Optical StO2 measurements | Use of visible light and the special properties of photons to obtain images | Direct/intravascular and tissue | Optical absortion contrast between OeHb and dHb | • Quantitative measurement of pO2 | • Perfusion dependent | |
| • | • Depht sensing limitation | |||||
| Luminescence quenching | Luminescent probes | Direct/tissue | Dectection of quenching of intensity of luminescent probe in presence of oxygen by optical readout devices | • High spatial resolution | • Low penetration of light | |
| • Quantitative measurement of pO2
| ||||||
| • Assessment of rapid changes in oxygenation status | ||||||
| Cherenkov luminescence imaging | Phosphorescent probes for oxygen or hypoxia-activated molecules | Indirect/tissue | Cherenkov radiation | • Quantitative measurement of pO2/hypoxia-activated molecules | • Penetration of radiation | |
| • | ||||||
PET = positron emission tomography; 18F = fluorine-18; 11C = carbon-11; 67Cu = copper-67; SPECT = single photon emission computed tomography; DCE = Dynamic contrast-enhanced; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; BOLD = blood oxygen level dependent; deoxyHb = deoxyhemoglobin; qBOLD = quantitative blood oxygen level dependent; MRS = magnetic resonance spectroscopy; EPR = electron paramagnetic resonance; ESR = electron spin resonance; OMRI = Overhauser-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2PA imaging of placental oxygenation on day 14 of gestation. (A) The placenta in a sagittal plane (obtained by a B-mode ultrasound scan) and parametric images created with the PA oxyhemo mode making possible the evaluation of blood oxygen saturation during variations in the oxygen levels supplied to the mother (5%–100%). PA imaging sequences during hyperoxygenation (B), hypoxia (C) and hyperoxygenation (D). Reprinted with permission from reference 76: Arthuis CJ, Novell A, Raes F, Escoffre JM, Lerondel S, et al. Real-time monitoring of placental oxygenation during maternal hypoxia and hyperoxygenation using photoacoustic imaging. PLoS One 2017;12:e0169850.
PA = photoacoustic.
Figure 3Imaging of hypoxia within CT26 tumour bearing mice (n = 13), PET-MRI: (A-D) Representative PET-MRI images showing the global co-localisation of FMISO uptake and BOLD MRI signal. Images were acquired 120 minutes post-injection of 10 MBq of 18F FMISO PET. (A) Representative maximum-intensity-projection FMISO PET Image; (B) Transversal slice showing FMISO uptake within the tumour; (C) T2*-weighted MRI and (D) BOLD image derived from T2* mapping. White dashed lines: tumour limits, white arrows: oxygenated tumour area (increased BOLD signal), black circle: hypoxic tumour areas (decreased BOLD signal). CLI: (E) Representative FMISO CLI image of the same mouse as for (A) to (D) acquired just after the PET-MRI scan. (F) Tumour-to-background ratio for PET, MRI and CLI following the injection of FMISO determined by the ratio of the signal from the tumour and a contralateral irrelevant region of interest (muscle). Reprinted with permission from reference 85: Desvaux E, Courteau A, Bellaye P-S, Guillemin M, Drouet C, Walker P, et al. Cherenkov luminescence imaging is a fast and relevant preclinical tool to assess tumour hypoxia in vivo. EJNMMI Res 2018;8:111.
PET = positron emission tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; FMISO = fluoromisoinidazole; BOLD = blood oxygen level dependent; CLI = Cherenkov luminescence imaging.
*p < 0.001.