| Literature DB >> 25590139 |
Kristina M Blackmore1, Julia A Knight2, Jane Walter3, Lothar Lilge3.
Abstract
Mammographic density (MD), associated with higher water and lower fat content in the breast, is strongly related to breast cancer risk. Optical attenuation spectroscopy (OS) is a non-imaging method of evaluating breast tissue composition by red and near-infrared light transmitted through the breast that, unlike mammography, does not involve radiation. OS provides information on wavelength dependent light scattering of tissue and on absorption by water, lipid, oxy-, deoxy-hemoglobin. We propose that OS could be an alternative marker of breast cancer risk and that OS breast tissue measures will be associated with MD. In the present analysis, we developed an algorithm to estimate breast tissue composition and light scattering parameters using a spectrally constrained global fitting procedure employing a diffuse light transport model. OS measurements were obtained from 202 pre- and post-menopausal women with normal mammograms. Percent density (PD) and dense area (DA) were measured using Cumulus. The association between OS tissue composition and PD and DA was analyzed using linear regression adjusted for body mass index. Among pre-menopausal women, lipid content was significantly inversely associated with square root transformed PD (β = -0.05, p = 0.0002) and DA (β = -0.05, p = 0.019); water content was significantly positively associated with PD (β = 0.06, p = 0.008). Tissue oxygen saturation was marginally inversely associated with PD (β = -0.03, p = 0.057) but significantly inversely associated with DA (β = -0.10, p = 0.002). Among post-menopausal women lipid and water content were significantly associated (negatively and positively, respectively) with PD (β lipid = -0.08, β water = 0.14, both p<0.0001) and DA (β lipid = -0.10, p<0.0001; β water = 0.11, p = 0.001). The association between OS breast content and PD and DA is consistent with more proliferation in dense tissue of younger women, greater lipid content in low density tissue and higher water content in high density tissue. OS may be useful for assessing physiologic tissue differences related to breast cancer risk, particularly when mammography is not feasible or easily accessible.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25590139 PMCID: PMC4295879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The attenuation spectra (optical density (OD) per cm over all wavelengths) of four main breast tissue components—water, lipid, oxyhemoglobin, and deoxyhemoglobin.
Constraints and penalties employed in fitting algorithm used to obtain chromophore concentrations and scattering parameters.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Total Hemoglobin Concentration ( | ≥ 0 | Rigid Constraint |
| Hemoglobin Oxygen Saturation (StO2, %) | ≥ 0%, ≤ 100% | Rigid Constraint |
| Lipid Concentration (%) | ≥ 0%, ≤ 100% | Rigid Constraint |
| Water Concentration (%) | ≥ 0%, ≤ 100% | Rigid Constraint |
| Scatter Amplitude (cm-1) | ≥ 1cm-1, ≤ 40cm-1 | Rigid Constraint |
| Scatter Power | ≥ 0.05, ≤ 5.0 | Rigid Constraint |
| Sum of Chromophore Concentrations (%) | ≥ 0%, ≤ 100% | Penalty |
| Amplitude of Best-Fit Spectrum | > Amplitude of Participant Spectrum | Penalty |
1Rigid constraints are restrictions on the fit such that if the value being constrained is out of range, those fit parameters are rejected by the algorithm. The fit algorithm will go back to the previous set of fit parameters and will continue the search for a minimum in another direction
2Penalties are constraints where if the value being constrained is out of range, a fixed penalty value is added to the X 2 value for each instance where the fit value is out of range to artificially indicate that the fit is not good
Means and standard deviations (SDs) of percent mammographic density, dense area, age, BMI and OS tissue optical properties by menopausal status.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) mean ± SD (Range) | 45.7 ± 3.8 (37.0–54.0) | 55.1 ± 6.2 (42.0–74.0) |
| BMI (kgm-2) mean ± SD (Range) | 26.3 ± 6.5 (18.0–54.9) | 26.8 ± 5.1 (18.6–43.9) |
| Percent Density (%) mean ± SD (Range) | 34.7 ± 19.2 (1.3–79.5) | 22.0 ± 17.3 (0.2–61.2) |
| Dense Area (cm2) mean ± SD (Range) | 43.0 ± 26.3 (0.0–113.3) | 28.0 ± 23.0 (0.1–101.3) |
| THC ( | 15.7 ± 4.8 (4.9–30.9) | 12.4 ± 4.7 (4.0–27.1) |
| StO2 (%) mean ± SD (Range) | 70.5 ± 7.6 (49.0–93.7) | 68.5 ± 8.0 (36.0–84.7) |
| Lipids (%) mean ± SD (Range) | 61.5 ± 10.2 (36.0–80.6) | 68.3 ± 9.0 (40.2–87.5) |
| Water (%) mean ± SD (Range) | 21.3 ± 7.2 (10.1–44.5) | 18.2 ± 5.9 (5.6–41.7) |
| Scattering Amplitude (cm-1) mean ± SD (Range) | 14.6 ± 3.4 (6.9–24.2) | 12.9 ± 2.9 (7.3–21.6) |
| Scattering Power mean ± SD (Range) | 0.35 ± 0.31 (0.06–1.64) | 0.38 ± 0.26 (0.06–1.25) |
BMI; Body mass index
THC; Total hemoglobin content
StO2; oxygen tissue saturation
Results of Pearson correlation analysis of OS parameters with age, BMI and each other among pre- and post-menopausal women.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (years) | -0.061 (0.558) | -0.007 (0.944) | 0.118 (0.256) | -0.034 (0.743) | -0.353 (0.0002) | -0.130 (0.181) | 0.324 (0.0007) | -0.028 (0.772) |
| BMI (kgm-2) | -0.094 (0.368) | 0.424 (<0.0001) | 0.266 (0.01) | -0.474 (<0.0001) | -0.188 (0.055) | 0.052 (0.598) | 0.275 (0.005) | -0.401 (<0.0001) |
| THC (µM) | - | 0.287 (0.005) | -0.375 (0.0002) | 0.103 (0.318) | - | 0.239 (0.013) | -0.517 (<0.0001) | 0.258 (0.007) |
| StO2(%) | 0.287 (0.005) | - | 0.189 (0.066) | -0.457 (<0.0001) | 0.239 (0.013) | - | 0.067 (0.493) | -0.273 (0.005) |
| Lipids (%) | -0.375 (0.0002) | 0.189 (0.066) | - | -0.530 (<0.0001) | -0.517 (<0.0001) | 0.067 (0.493) | - | -0.501 (<0.0001) |
| Water (%) | 0.103 (0.318) | -0.457 (<0.0001) | -0.530 (<0.0001) | - | 0.258 (0.007) | -0.273 (0.005) | -0.501 (<0.0001) | - |
BMI; Body Mass Index
THC; Total haemoglobin content
StO2; oxygen tissue saturation
Unadjusted, adjusted (for age and BMI) and final regression coefficients (β) and standard errors (SEs) for breast tissue optical properties with percent density (square root transformation) for 95 pre- and 107 post-menopausal women.
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||||
| Age (years) | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.69 | < 0.01 | - | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.01 | - |
| BMI (kgm-2) | -0.19 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.45 | - | -0.20 | 0.03 | < 0.0001 | 0.27 | - |
| THC ( | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.042 | 0.04 | - | 0.17 | 0.04 | < 0.0001 | 0.15 | - |
| StO2 (%) | -0.12 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.24 | - | -0.02 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.01 | - |
| Lipids (%) | -0.10 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.30 | - | -0.14 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.40 | - |
| Water (%) | 0.16 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.43 | - | 0.24 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.48 | - |
| Amplitude (cm-1) | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.02 | - | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.002 | 0.09 | - |
| Power | -2.04 | 0.57 | 0.0005 | 0.12 | - | -1.59 | 0.73 | 0.033 | 0.04 | - |
|
| ||||||||||
| THC ( | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0.002 | 0.10 | 0.36 |
| StO2 (%) | -0.05 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.04 | 0.50 | -0.02 | 0.02 | 0.38 | < 0.01 | 0.31 |
| Lipids (%) | -0.07 | 0.01 | < 0.0001 | 0.14 | 0.60 | -0.12 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.42 | 0.54 |
| Water (%) | 0.10 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.14 | 0.59 | 0.19 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Amplitude (cm-1) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.92 | < 0.01 | 0.46 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.32 |
| Power | 0.22 | 0.55 | 0.69 | < 0.01 | 0.46 | -0.52 | 0.69 | 0.45 | < 0.01 | 0.30 |
|
| 0.66 | 0.65 | ||||||||
| BMI (kgm-2) | -0.12 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.45 | -0.10 | 0.03 | 0.0002 | 0.03 | ||
| StO2 (%) | -0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Lipids (%) | -0.05 | 0.01 | 0.0002 | 0.14 | -0.08 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.13 | ||
| Water (%) | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.008 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.49 | ||
* Adjusted for age (years) and BMI (kgm-2)
Figure 2Scatterplot showing the final association of OS chromophore measures [lipid%(red square), water%(blue circle), StO2%(green star)] with PD (square root transformed) in pre (top) and post-menopausal women (bottom) adjusted for BMI.
Unadjusted, adjusted (for age and BMI) and final regression coefficients (β) and SEs for breast tissue optical properties with dense area (square root transformation) for 95 pre-and 107 post-menopausal women.
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||||
| Age (years) | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.24 | 0.02 | - | -0.03 | 0.04 | 0.38 | < 0.01 | - |
| BMI (kgm-2) | -0.003 | 0.001 | 0.044 | 0.04 | - | -0.001 | 0.002 | 0.42 | < 0.01 | - |
| THC ( | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.46 | < 0.01 | - | 0.18 | 0.04 | < 0.0001 | 0.14 | - |
| StO2 (%) | -0.11 | 0.03 | < 0.0001 | 0.16 | - | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.03 | - |
| Lipids (%) | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.004 | 0.09 | - | -0.13 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.25 | - |
| Water (%) | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.004 | 0.09 | - | 0.19 | 0.03 | < 0.0001 | 0.25 | - |
| Amplitude (cm-1) | -0.08 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.02 | - | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.04 | - |
| Power | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 0.01 | - | -0.72 | 0.82 | 0.38 | < 0.01 | - |
|
| ||||||||||
| THC ( | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.54 | < 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.05 | < 0.0001 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| StO2 (%) | -0.10 | 0.03 | 0.0001 | 0.16 | 0.20 | -0.05 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Lipids (%) | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.005 | 0.09 | 0.14 | -0.14 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.30 | 0.32 |
| Water (%) | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.007 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.03 | < 0.0001 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Amplitude (cm-1) | -0.07 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.038 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Power | -0.70 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.07 | -0.75 | 0.83 | 0.37 | < 0.01 | 0.02 |
|
| 0.21 | 0.37 | ||||||||
| StO2 (%) | -0.10 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.16 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Lipids (%) | -0.05 | 0.02 | 0.019 | 0.05 | -0.10 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | 0.30 | ||
| Water (%) | - | - | - | - | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.07 | ||
* Adjusted for age (years) and BMI (kgm-2)
Figure 3Scatterplot showing the final association of OS chromophore measures [lipid%(red square), water%(blue circle), StO2%(green star)] with DA (square root transformed) in pre (top) and post-menopausal women (bottom).