Literature DB >> 32317771

Can respirator face masks in a developing country reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter?

Sasan Faridi1,2, Ramin Nabizadeh Nodehi1,2, Saeed Sadeghian3, Masih Tajdini3, Mohammad Hoseini4, Masud Yunesian1,5, Shahrokh Nazmara1, Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand6,7, Kazem Naddafi8,9.   

Abstract

Respirator face masks (RFMs) as a personal-level intervention is increasingly being utilized to reduce ambient particulate matter (PM) exposure, globally. We tested the effectiveness of 50 commercially available ones in reducing the exposure of ambient particle number concentrations (PNC), PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 (PM ≤ 10, 2.5, and 1 μm in diameter, respectively) in a traffic-affected urban site in Tehran. To examine the efficiency of RFMs, we applied a specific experimental setup including vacuum pumps, dummy heads, connecting tubes, glass chambers, and GRIMM Aerosol Spectrometer to measure all metrics after dummy heads. The average effectiveness of RFMs was in the range of 0.7-83.5%, 3.5-68.1%, 0.8-46.1%, and 0.4-32.2% in reducing ambient PNC, PM10, PM2.5, and PM1, respectively. Considering all metrics, the highest effectiveness was observed always for Biomask, followed by 3 M 9332, due to their well-designed physical characteristics (e.g., adjustable nose clip for any face/nose shape, and size, soft inner material in the nose panel to provide a secure seal against leakage, adjustable or elasticated straps/ear loops to better adjust on any face). Biomask reduced ambient PM10 with a mean value of 94.6 μg m-3 (minimum-maximum: 51.7-100.3 μg m-3), whereas it filtered on average just 29.0 μg m-3 (25.7-43.5 μg m-3) of ambient PM2.5 and 18.2 μg m-3 (14.7-21.8 μg m-3) of PM1. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process to find the most important design-related factors of RFMs affecting their effectiveness, which showed the exhalation valve and its diaphragm (20.4%), nose clip (19.7%), and cheek flaps (18.6%) are ranked as the main design-related variables. The fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution indicated that Biomask and 3M 9332 had scores of 1 and 0.97, the highest scores compared with other RFMs. This study provides crucial evidence-based results to elucidate the effectiveness and design-related factors of RFMs in real-environmental circumstances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effectiveness; Particulate matter air pollution; Real-world condition; Respirator face mask; Tehran

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32317771     DOI: 10.1038/s41370-020-0222-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  45 in total

1.  The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale.

Authors:  J Lelieveld; J S Evans; M Fnais; D Giannadaki; A Pozzer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Sanjay Rajagopalan; Sadeer G Al-Kindi; Robert D Brook
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  "What We Breathe Impacts Our Health: Improving Understanding of the Link between Air Pollution and Health".

Authors:  J Jason West; Aaron Cohen; Frank Dentener; Bert Brunekreef; Tong Zhu; Ben Armstrong; Michelle L Bell; Michael Brauer; Gregory Carmichael; Dan L Costa; Douglas W Dockery; Michael Kleeman; Michal Krzyzanowski; Nino Künzli; Catherine Liousse; Shih-Chun Candice Lung; Randall V Martin; Ulrich Pöschl; C Arden Pope; James M Roberts; Armistead G Russell; Christine Wiedinmyer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Richard Fuller; Nereus J R Acosta; Olusoji Adeyi; Robert Arnold; Niladri Nil Basu; Abdoulaye Bibi Baldé; Roberto Bertollini; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Jo Ivey Boufford; Patrick N Breysse; Thomas Chiles; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Awa M Coll-Seck; Maureen L Cropper; Julius Fobil; Valentin Fuster; Michael Greenstone; Andy Haines; David Hanrahan; David Hunter; Mukesh Khare; Alan Krupnick; Bruce Lanphear; Bindu Lohani; Keith Martin; Karen V Mathiasen; Maureen A McTeer; Christopher J L Murray; Johanita D Ndahimananjara; Frederica Perera; Janez Potočnik; Alexander S Preker; Jairam Ramesh; Johan Rockström; Carlos Salinas; Leona D Samson; Karti Sandilya; Peter D Sly; Kirk R Smith; Achim Steiner; Richard B Stewart; William A Suk; Onno C P van Schayck; Gautam N Yadama; Kandeh Yumkella; Ma Zhong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: a window of opportunity.

Authors:  Michael B Hadley; Rajesh Vedanthan; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Developing a Clinical Approach to Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Health.

Authors:  Michael B Hadley; Jill Baumgartner; Rajesh Vedanthan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  National and sub-national exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and its attributable burden of disease in Iran from 1990 to 2016.

Authors:  Mansour Shamsipour; Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand; Kimiya Gohari; Masud Yunesian; Akbar Fotouhi; Kazem Naddafi; Ali Sheidaei; Sasan Faridi; Ali Asghar Akhlaghi; Katayoun Rabiei; Parinaz Mehdipour; Mokhtar Mahdavi; Heresh Amini; Farshad Farzadfar
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 8.  The Global Threat of Outdoor Ambient Air Pollution to Cardiovascular Health: Time for Intervention.

Authors:  Robert D Brook; David E Newby; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  Global Effect Factors for Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Thomas E McKone; Marko Tainio; Olivier Jolliet; Joshua S Apte; Katerina S Stylianou; Nicole Illner; Julian D Marshall; Ernani F Choma; John S Evans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter.

Authors:  Richard Burnett; Hong Chen; Mieczysław Szyszkowicz; Neal Fann; Bryan Hubbell; C Arden Pope; Joshua S Apte; Michael Brauer; Aaron Cohen; Scott Weichenthal; Jay Coggins; Qian Di; Bert Brunekreef; Joseph Frostad; Stephen S Lim; Haidong Kan; Katherine D Walker; George D Thurston; Richard B Hayes; Chris C Lim; Michelle C Turner; Michael Jerrett; Daniel Krewski; Susan M Gapstur; W Ryan Diver; Bart Ostro; Debbie Goldberg; Daniel L Crouse; Randall V Martin; Paul Peters; Lauren Pinault; Michael Tjepkema; Aaron van Donkelaar; Paul J Villeneuve; Anthony B Miller; Peng Yin; Maigeng Zhou; Lijun Wang; Nicole A H Janssen; Marten Marra; Richard W Atkinson; Hilda Tsang; Thuan Quoc Thach; John B Cannon; Ryan T Allen; Jaime E Hart; Francine Laden; Giulia Cesaroni; Francesco Forastiere; Gudrun Weinmayr; Andrea Jaensch; Gabriele Nagel; Hans Concin; Joseph V Spadaro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Health burden and economic loss attributable to ambient PM2.5 in Iran based on the ground and satellite data.

Authors:  Sasan Faridi; Reza Bayat; Aaron J Cohen; Ensieh Sharafkhani; Jeffrey R Brook; Sadegh Niazi; Mansour Shamsipour; Heresh Amini; Kazem Naddafi; Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A Simple Method to Quantify Outward Leakage of Medical Face Masks and Barrier Face Coverings: Implication for the Overall Filtration Efficiency.

Authors:  Silvia Chiera; Alessandro Cristoforetti; Luca Benedetti; Giandomenico Nollo; Luca Borro; Lorenzo Mazzei; Francesco Tessarolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.