Katherine Ni1, Mary Cooter2, Dhanesh K Gupta2, Jake Thomas3, Thomas J Hopkins2, Timothy E Miller2, Michael L James4, Miklos D Kertai5, Miles Berger6. 1. Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 2. Anesthesiology Department, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Anesthesiology Department, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Neurology Department, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Anesthesiology Department, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: miles.berger@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and MAC-awake decrease with age. We hypothesised that, in clinical practice, (i) end-tidal MAC fraction in older patients would decline by less than the predicted age-dependent MAC decrease (i.e. older patients would receive relatively excessive anaesthetic concentrations), and (ii) bispectral index (BIS) values would therefore be lower in older patients. METHODS: We examined the relationship between end-tidal MAC fraction, BIS values, and age in 4699 patients > 30 yr in age at a single centre using unadjusted local regression (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing), Spearman's correlation, stratification, and robust univariable and multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: The end-tidal MAC fraction in older patients declined by 3.01% per decade (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.56-3.45; P<0.001), less than the 6.47% MAC decrease per decade that we found in a meta-regression analysis of published studies of age-dependent changes in MAC (P<0.001), and less than the age-dependent decrease in MAC-awake. The BIS values correlated positively with age (ρ=0.15; 95% CI: 0.12-0.17; P<0.001), and inversely with the age-adjusted end-tidal MAC (aaMAC) fraction (ρ= -0.13; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.11; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The age-dependent decline in end-tidal MAC fraction delivered in clinical practice at our institution was less than the age-dependent percentage decrease in MAC and MAC-awake determined from published studies. Despite receiving higher aaMAC fractions, older patients paradoxically showed higher BIS values. This most likely suggests that the BIS algorithm is inaccurate in older adults.
BACKGROUND: Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and MAC-awake decrease with age. We hypothesised that, in clinical practice, (i) end-tidal MAC fraction in older patients would decline by less than the predicted age-dependent MAC decrease (i.e. older patients would receive relatively excessive anaesthetic concentrations), and (ii) bispectral index (BIS) values would therefore be lower in older patients. METHODS: We examined the relationship between end-tidal MAC fraction, BIS values, and age in 4699 patients > 30 yr in age at a single centre using unadjusted local regression (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing), Spearman's correlation, stratification, and robust univariable and multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: The end-tidal MAC fraction in older patients declined by 3.01% per decade (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.56-3.45; P<0.001), less than the 6.47% MAC decrease per decade that we found in a meta-regression analysis of published studies of age-dependent changes in MAC (P<0.001), and less than the age-dependent decrease in MAC-awake. The BIS values correlated positively with age (ρ=0.15; 95% CI: 0.12-0.17; P<0.001), and inversely with the age-adjusted end-tidal MAC (aaMAC) fraction (ρ= -0.13; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.11; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The age-dependent decline in end-tidal MAC fraction delivered in clinical practice at our institution was less than the age-dependent percentage decrease in MAC and MAC-awake determined from published studies. Despite receiving higher aaMAC fractions, older patients paradoxically showed higher BIS values. This most likely suggests that the BIS algorithm is inaccurate in older adults.
Authors: Sandeep C Manyam; Dhanesh K Gupta; Ken B Johnson; Julia L White; Nathan L Pace; Dwayne R Westenskow; Talmage D Egan Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Troy S Wildes; Angela M Mickle; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Hannah R Maybrier; Jordan Oberhaus; Thaddeus P Budelier; Alex Kronzer; Sherry L McKinnon; Daniel Park; Brian A Torres; Thomas J Graetz; Daniel A Emmert; Ben J Palanca; Shreya Goswami; Katherine Jordan; Nan Lin; Bradley A Fritz; Tracey W Stevens; Eric Jacobsohn; Eva M Schmitt; Sharon K Inouye; Susan Stark; Eric J Lenze; Michael S Avidan Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Miles Berger; Martin S Angst; Deborah J Culley; Catherine E Price; David A Scott; Robert A Whittington; Roderic G Eckenhoff Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Matthias Kreuzer; Matthew A Stern; Darren Hight; Sebastian Berger; Gerhard Schneider; James W Sleigh; Paul S García Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Mary Cooter; Katherine Ni; Jake Thomas; Dhanesh K Gupta; Thomas J Hopkins; Timothy E Miller; Michael L James; Miklos D Kertai; Miles Berger Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Elizabeth Mahanna-Gabrielli; Katie J Schenning; Lars I Eriksson; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Clinton B Wright; Deborah J Culley; Lis Evered; David A Scott; Nae Yah Wang; Charles H Brown; Esther Oh; Patrick Purdon; Sharon Inouye; Miles Berger; Robert A Whittington; Catherine C Price; Stacie Deiner Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Robert B Schonberger; Amit Bardia; Feng Dai; George Michel; David Yanez; Jeptha P Curtis; Michelle T Vaughn; Matthew M Burg; Michael Mathis; Sachin Kheterpal; Shamsuddin Akhtar; Nirav Shah Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Mary Cooter Wright; Thomas Bunning; Sarada S Eleswarpu; Mitchell T Heflin; Shelley R McDonald; Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadalayan; Heather E Whitson; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Stacie G Deiner; Miles Berger Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Xiuyun Liu; Mitsunori Nakano; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Brian Bush; Kei Akiyoshi; Jennifer K Lee; Raymond C Koehler; Charles W Hogue; Charles H Brown Journal: J Clin Anesth Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 9.452