The inhibitory effect of halothane on the emetic response in the ferret.

Emesis and nausea are often associated with anaesthesia and continue to be a common clinical problem. Past clinical studies have demonstrated that halothane produces a higher incidence of vomiting compared with other anaesthetics, but some investigators have described an antiemetic effect. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of various doses of halothane on the emetic response in the decerebrate ferret. Following a control emetic response, a maximum of six increasing cumulative concentrations of halothane were delivered. At the end of each delivery period, the supradiaphragmatic vagal communicating branch, which has been shown to reproducibly elicit vomiting, was electrically stimulated and the emetic response was monitored. An increase in halothane concentration produced a marked depression of tongue, abdominal muscle, and diaphragm EMG activity as well as a decrease in central venous pressure. Licking, a prodromal response comparable to nausea in the human, appeared to be most sensitive. An increase in latency of the emetic response occurred as the concentration of halothane was increased. All phases of the response were observed at concentrations below 0.6 vol% halothane. At 0.6 vol% halothane, 75% of the animals vomited. At higher concentrations, the emetic response was completely abolished. One hour post-halothane, all latencies had returned to near control values. The methods utilized in this study provided a model that was not complicated by a large number of variables usually present in clinical studies. These data demonstrate that halothane exerts an inhibitory, concentration-dependent, and reversible effect on the emetic response in the ferret and provide further support that halothane alone does not possess emetic properties at clinical properties at clinical concentrations.