Literature DB >> 31271829

A Systematic Review of the Clinical Implementation of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Planning for External Beam Radiation Therapy.

David Bird1, Ann M Henry2, David Sebag-Montefiore2, David L Buckley3, Bashar Al-Qaisieh4, Richard Speight4.   

Abstract

The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scans alone for radiation therapy treatment planning (MR-only planning) has been highlighted as one method of improving patient outcomes. Recent technologic advances have meant that introducing MR-only planning to the clinic is becoming a reality, with several specialist radiation therapy clinics using this technique for treatment. As such, substantial efforts are being made to introduce this technique into wide-spread clinical implementation. A systematic review of publications investigating the clinical implementation of pelvic MR-only radiation therapy treatment planning was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Medline, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science databases were searched (timespan: all years to January 2, 2019). Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were grouped into the following categories: (1) MR acquisition and synthetic computed tomography generation verification, (2) MR distortion quantification and phantom development, (3) clinical validation of patient treatment positioning in an MR-only workflow, and (4) MR-only commissioning processes. Key conclusions from this review are (1) MR-only planning has been implemented clinically for prostate cancer treatments; (2) a substantial amount of work remains to translate MR-only planning into widespread clinical implementation for all pelvic sites; (3) MR scanner distortions are no longer a barrier to MR-only planning, but they must be managed appropriately; (4) MR-only-based patient positioning verification shows promise, but limited evidence is reported in the literature and further investigation is required; and (5) a number of MR-only commissioning processes have been reported, which can aid centers as they undertake local commissioning; however, this needs to be formalized in guidance from national bodies.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31271829     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

Review 1.  Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Caterina Brighi; Carri Glide-Hurst; Gary Liney; Paul Z Y Liu; Suzanne Lydiard; Chiara Paganelli; Trang Pham; Shanshan Shan; Alison C Tree; Uulke A van der Heide; David E J Waddington; Brendan Whelan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 65.011

2.  Clinical experience and workflow challenges with magnetic resonance-only radiation therapy simulation and planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Neelam Tyagi; Michael J Zelefsky; Andreas Wibmer; Kristen Zakian; Sarah Burleson; Laura Happersett; Aleksi Halkola; Mo Kadbi; Margie Hunt
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  MR-PROTECT: Clinical feasibility of a prostate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment workflow and investigation of acceptance criteria.

Authors:  Emilia Persson; Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Petra Ambolt; Silke Engelholm; Sofie Ceberg; Sven Bäck; Lars E Olsson; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan J Wyatt; Rachel A Pearson; Christopher P Walker; Rachel L Brooks; Karen Pilling; Hazel M McCallum
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-02

5.  Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Henna Kavaluus; Katri Nousiainen; Sampsa Kaijaluoto; Tiina Seppälä; Kauko Saarilahti; Mikko Tenhunen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images.

Authors:  Emilia Persson; Sevgi Emin; Jonas Scherman; Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Patrik Brynolfsson; Sofie Ceberg; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Lars E Olsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michał Posiewnik; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 8.  [MRI-guided minimally invasive treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  Fabian Tollens; Niklas Westhoff; Jost von Hardenberg; Sven Clausen; Michael Ehmann; Frank G Zöllner; Anne Adlung; Dominik F Bauer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Dominik Nörenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  A multi-institutional analysis of a general pelvis continuous Hounsfield unit synthetic CT software for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Victoria Y Yu; Jani Keyrilainen; Sami Suilamo; Ilyes Beslimane; Alex Dresner; Aleksi Halkola; Uulke A Van der Heide; Neelam Tyagi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Patient position verification in magnetic-resonance imaging only radiotherapy of anal and rectal cancers.

Authors:  David Bird; Matthew Beasley; Michael G Nix; Marcus Tyyger; Hazel McCallum; Mark Teo; Alexandra Gilbert; Nathalie Casanova; Rachel Cooper; David L Buckley; David Sebag-Montefiore; Richard Speight; Ann M Henry; Bashar Al-Qaisieh
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.