BACKGROUND: Data from the international literature have shown changes in the profile of cardiologists and in their medical practices. However, there is no data on this in Brazilian cardiologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate professional and personal characteristics of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study; a questionnaire was sent by e-mail to cardiologists, active members of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology in 2017. The results were analyzed, and the level of significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 13,462 cardiologists, with 2,101 (15.6%) respondents, mostly men (71.8% versus 28.2%). Age distribution and marital status were significantly different between the sexes (p < 0.001). The number of cardiologists without children was higher among women (40.5% versus 16.1%; p < 0.001). The most common place of work was the public hospital (46.5%), followed by private hospital (28.5%) and private office (21.1%). The office was the main place of work for 23.9% of men and 14% of women (p < 0.001), with predominance of individuals older than 50 years (31.7% versus 10.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). Most cardiologists (64.2%) worked more than 40 hours a week (69% of them men and 51.9% of the women; p < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of the sample earned more than BRL 11,000 (US$ 3,473.43), and 66.5% of the men earned more than BRL 20,000 (US$ 6,315.32) per month, versus 31.2% of the women (p < 0.001). A high level of work-related stress was reported by 11.3% of respondents. CONCLUSION: Most cardiologists were men, who showed higher workload and higher income; 11.3% of the cardiologists perceived stress as a great deal.
BACKGROUND: Data from the international literature have shown changes in the profile of cardiologists and in their medical practices. However, there is no data on this in Brazilian cardiologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate professional and personal characteristics of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study; a questionnaire was sent by e-mail to cardiologists, active members of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology in 2017. The results were analyzed, and the level of significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 13,462 cardiologists, with 2,101 (15.6%) respondents, mostly men (71.8% versus 28.2%). Age distribution and marital status were significantly different between the sexes (p < 0.001). The number of cardiologists without children was higher among women (40.5% versus 16.1%; p < 0.001). The most common place of work was the public hospital (46.5%), followed by private hospital (28.5%) and private office (21.1%). The office was the main place of work for 23.9% of men and 14% of women (p < 0.001), with predominance of individuals older than 50 years (31.7% versus 10.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). Most cardiologists (64.2%) worked more than 40 hours a week (69% of them men and 51.9% of the women; p < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of the sample earned more than BRL 11,000 (US$ 3,473.43), and 66.5% of the men earned more than BRL 20,000 (US$ 6,315.32) per month, versus 31.2% of the women (p < 0.001). A high level of work-related stress was reported by 11.3% of respondents. CONCLUSION: Most cardiologists were men, who showed higher workload and higher income; 11.3% of the cardiologists perceived stress as a great deal.
Medical activity has been associated with high levels of stress and dissatisfaction
compared with other occupations.[1]
Previous studies have shown that there is a complex relationship between the level
of work satisfaction, work-life balance, burnout level, demographic factors and work
conditions.[2]The progress of medicine and specialties, especially in the last decades, has
promoted rapid chances in personal and professional lives of
cardiologists.[3-5] In addition, international data have
shown the aging of working classes, with changes in the profile and characteristics
of professional activities, but still a predominance of men and a striking
difference of salaries between the sexes.[6] However, data on the profile of Brazilian cardiologists and
their perceptions of the profession are limited.Therefore, the present study describes the profile of the Brazilian cardiologist from
data obtained in the study conducted by the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC),
in terms of demographic, social, and professional aspects and quality of life.
Methods
The BSC developed a questionnaire composed of three main domains: demographic data,
professional activity and quality of life. This questionnaire was sent by e-mail to
13,462 cardiologists, active members of the BSC in 2017. A total of 2,101
participants answered the questionnaire and composed the study group, 1,509 men
(71.8%) and 592 women (28.2%).
Statistical analysis
The variables were expressed as absolute frequency, percentage and 95% confidence
interval. Qualitative variables were compared using the chi-square test followed
by analysis of adjusted standardized residuals. Analysis of the answers was
performed using the SPSS Statistics for Windows version 25.0 (IBM, Chicago). The
level of significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05).
Results
Demographic data
Of the 13,462 active members of the BSC, 9,555 (70.9%) were men, 9,752 (71.1%)
were aged between 30 and 59 years, and 1,323 (9.8%) aged 70 years or older. Most
members lived in the southeast (55.5%) or in the south (15.1%) of Brazil as
follows - 3,420 (25.4%) in São Paulo, 2,158 (16%) in Rio de Janeiro,
1,572 (11.6%) in Minas Gerais, 853 (6.3%) in Rio Grande do Sul and 774 (5,7%) in
Paraná State.The questionnaire was answered by 2,101 cardiologists (response rate 15.6%),
1,509 men (71.8%) and 592 women (28.2%). Regarding the age of participants,
1,077 (51.3%) were older than 50 years. Figure
1 shows the distribution of age by sex, with a difference between men
and women (p < 0.0001). Thirty-four percent of men and 13% of women were aged
60 years or older. Most respondents were married (77.7¨%), 84.7% of the men and
59.8% of the women (p < 0.001). With respect to the number of children, 23%
did not have children, and 57.3% had two or more children. The number of
cardiologists who did not have children was higher among women (40.5
versus 16.1%; p < 0.001). The difference remained
significant after adjustment for age, but not after adjustment for marital
status.
Figure 1
Demographic characteristics.
Demographic characteristics.
Characteristics of professional activity
Most respondents (70.5%) had the title of specialists in cardiology from the
BSC/Brazilian Medical Association, and 29.5% were applicants for the title. Most
participants (n = 1,336; 65.4%) worked in only one field, especially clinical
cardiology (50.5%), with no difference between men and women; 2.8% of the
interviewees did not answer this question.Regarding the number of working hours per week, 1,350 (64.2%) participants (69%
of the men and 51.9% of the women, p < 0.001) worked more than 40 hours; 363
(17.3%) worked in only one place, and 1,036 (49.3%) worked in three or more
places. The most common place of work was the public hospital (46.5%), followed
by private hospital (28.5%) and private office (21.15) (Figure 2). The public hospital was the main place of work
for 53% of women 44% of men (p<0.001). On the other hand, private office was
the main work place for 23.9% of men and 14% of women, three times more frequent
among cardiologists older than 50 years (31.7 versus 10.1%). Only 0.3% of
participants reported to work in public health centers. No difference was found
in the number of work places between the sexes.
Figure 2
Professional characteristics. BSC: Brazilian Society of
Cardiology
Professional characteristics. BSC: Brazilian Society of
CardiologyMonthly income was higher than 11,000 Brazilian reals (BRL) (US$ 3,473.43). The
distribution of income by sex is depicted in Figure 3; 66.5% of men and 31.2% of women (p < 0.001) reported to
gain more than 20,000 BRL (adjusted for number of working hours and age
range).
Figure 3
Salary difference between men and women.
Salary difference between men and women.Regarding the level of stress (Figure 4),
64.2% reported an adequate level of stress; 11.3% perceived stress as a great
deal, and 24.3% reported no stress. The causes of stress at work were poor
working conditions (36.7%), excessive working hours (23.5%), low pay (15.7%),
work pressure (10.9%), and others (13%).
Figure 4
Level of stress.
Level of stress.With regards to legal issues, 13.9% of participants reported having been sued for
medical malpractices, and 0.3% reported to have been condemned. The question was
not answered by 10 participants (0.4%).Considering the age participants wished to retire, 10.5% reported they wished to
retire before the age of 60 years, 46.1% between 61 and 70 years, 34.1% between
71 and 80 years, 4.7% older than 80 years, and 14.6% reported they do not want
to retire from their work as a cardiologist. Regarding the retirement financial
planning, 58.4% reported to contribute to a private retirement plan.The questionnaire also included questions about participants' perception on the
influence of technology, spirituality, the role of the media on their work. The
use of technology on a daily basis was reported by 84.7% of the respondents,
with no difference between sexes and age ranges. The frequency of technology use
for patient-physician communication was daily for 40.6% and weekly for 21.7% of
participants. Regarding the role of spirituality in the treatment of the
patients, it was considered "very useful" by 54.7%, "useful" by 30.1%, "not very
useful" by 6% of the respondents; 9.1% did not have a strong opinion about the
issue, and 0.5% did not answer the question. In terms of the frequency the
physicians talked about the subject "spirituality" with their patients, 54.1%
answered "eventually", 24.5% "often", 14.2% "never" and 0.5% did not answer the
question. As for how medical work was presented by the media, 73.7% considered
that the opinion expressed by the media was partial and unfavorable to the
doctors.
Quality of life
Most cardiologists reported to sleep between 6 and 7 hours per night (79.5%),
with no differences between men and women. Considering the time dedicated to
family and leisure activities (Figure 5),
41.8% answered less than 10 hours per week; 29.8% between 11 and 20 hours per
week, 17.9% between 21 and 30 hours per week, and 10.4% 31 hours or more per
week. The proportion of women who spent more than 20 hours with family-related
and leisure activities was greater than that of men (33.4%
versus 26.2%; p < 0.001).
Figure 5
Quality of life.
Quality of life.Smoking habit was reported by only 2.8% of cardiologists (3.3% of men and 1.5% of
women, p = 0.03). Regarding alcohol consumption, 34.3% reported the frequency of
≥ 2 times (40.1% of the men and 19.5% of the women, p,0.001), 30.1%
sometimes a month, 23.4% rarely, and 12% never. Regarding health-related
self-care, 52.6% considered themselves to be careful, 7.9% very careful, and
3.4% not careful, with no difference between men and women. With respect to the
health of participants, 56.1% reported to have a disease (42.5% of the men and
63.3% of the women; p < 0.001). Sixty percent reported continuous use of
medication (57.3% of the men and 59.1% of the women, p = 0.46).
Discussion
This is the third time the BSC developed studies aimed at evaluating the profile of
its member associates. However, this is the first time the Society promoted a more
comprehensive study and published the results.Despite the increase of women among medical professionals,[7] there is a remarkable predominance of men among
Brazilian cardiologists, similar to what is observed in other countries.[6,8,9] Most respondents in
our study was men (71.8% versus 28.2%), which is in agreement with the 2018 medical
demography in Brazil,[7] showing a
distribution of 69.7% of and 30.3% of women, and mean age of 48.9 ± 12.1
years among Brazilian cardiologists. This difference is greater among cardiologists
older than 50 years and less pronounced in younger subjects. Differences between
sexes were observed for marital status, number of children, income and workload.The proportion of married men who answered the questionnaire was significantly higher
than that of women. The proportion of cardiologists who did not have children was
higher among women, even after adjustment for age. Such difference is in accordance
with the results of a study conducted with North-American cardiologists.[6] Therefore, it is possible to infer
that the prolonged time from graduation and specialization may be associated with
these findings.Our study showed that, in higher income ranges, the proportion of men was higher than
of women, adjusted for work load and number of workplaces. This difference in income
between sexes has been reported in several other professional sectors[5] and has been registered in the last
decades among North-American cardiologists. Most professionals reported to work more
than 40 hours a week, with higher proportion of men in the private sector. The
proportion of women was higher in the public and academic settings, in which a lower
income was identified as compared with the private setting.Almost half of cardiologists work in three or more places. Interestingly, the private
office was reported to be the main place of work by only 21.1% of the respondents,
and this rate was even lower when considering individuals younger than 50 years
only. Thus, cardiology practice in private sectors has been less commonly seen
probably due to elevations in the number of doctor visits covered by private health
plans. These plans pay a relatively low price per service to the physicians, who
feel discouraged to set up and maintain their own clinics. This change in the
professional scenario may also be related to the fact that younger cardiologists are
concerned not only about seeking more immediate revenue but also about investing in
complementary pension.Despite the high work load, only 11.3% of cardiologists perceived stress as a great
deal. A study published by Mescape[10] concluded that 46% of North-American cardiologists had symptoms
of burnout, similar to the frequency reported in other specialties like pneumology
and nephrology. Although the questionnaire used in the study did not include
specific criteria for the diagnosis of burnout, data have suggested that there are
considerable differences between Brazilians and North-Americans regarding the
perception of stress at work, which can be related to sociocultural differences.
Also, there is a relatively lower occurrence of medical lawsuits among Brazilian
cardiologists. While 0.3% of our sample reported having been condemned, a study
published in the American Heart Journal in 2014[11] reported a rate of malpractice lawsuits of 8.6% in North
America and a 1% condemnation rate.The practice of physical exercise has well-established cardiovascular benefits and
should be encouraged. In our study, however, 31% of cardiologists did not practice
exercise. Only 11% of North-American cardiologists reported to be physically
inactive.[10] This
difference may be due to the higher workload faced by physicians in Brazil. Although
the percentage of smokers was relatively low, a high percentage of cardiologists
reported they were careless about their health (39.4%). Regarding alcohol
consumption, 34.3% of respondents reported a frequency of two times a week or more;
49% of North American cardiologists consumed up to one drink per week. These data
indicate that institutional campaigns aimed at promoting the adoption of healthy
habits and self-care among Brazilian cardiologists should be considered.The use of technology has facilitated the search for knowledge and contributed in
different aspects of daily life; also, it has allowed patients to communicate more
directly with their doctors. In our study, most cardiologists reported to use any
kind of technology on a daily basis in their work. A significant percentage (40.6%)
of cardiologists is contacted daily by patients through technology device, which
adds to the debate about the availability of physicians to respond to patients'
emails or on social media.According to the Brazilian Medical Council's resolution, published in 2002,[12] despite numerous positive
consequences of telemedicine, it is related to serious ethical and legal issues.
Considering the exponential use of social media by physicians, including for
patient-doctor communication, the Medical Council, in 2017,[13] recognized the importance of the
social media and stablished rules of conduct in this context.There has been increasing interest in issues of spirituality in the medical practice.
In the BSC, a group of study on spirituality and cardiovascular medicine was
created. In the present study, although 54.7% of participants considered that
spirituality was very useful in the treatment of the patients, 14.2% has never
talked about this subject with their patients and most (54.1%) of them did it only
eventually. This difference may be related to the scarcity of validated
qualification in the area.The study has some limitations, particularly regarding data collection. The rate of
response to the questionnaire was relatively low (15.6%), and on this basis, we
cannot affirm that the results would be the same in a larger sample. However,
similar studies have shown comparable results (15-25%). In the most recent study
conducted by the American College of Cardiology, which has continuously developed
studies on the theme in the last three decades, the response rate was 21%. In the
study conducted by the Medscape, the rate of response was 4%.
Conclusion
In this original study on the profile of Brazilian cardiologists, associates of the
BSC, significant differences between sexes were detected. While men had a greater
work load, the participation of women in higher income ranges was lower, even after
adjustment for work load. Most cardiologists worked in more than one place, mostly
in the public sector. Younger cardiologists had a lower tendency to work in private
offices. The perception of the level of work-related stress was considered
satisfactory. Considering the growing concern over personal and professional quality
of life, as well as over work performance, future research is warranted to further
explore the theme and to allow the planning of actions by medical entities and
societies, so that the specialty of cardiology can continue to attract the interest
of medical professionals.