Cardiology is a medical specialty that often involves outpatient and hospital activity,
leading cardiovascular care in a complex setting with aging. Increasing levels of
complex decision-making and knowledge about technological resources can generate
overload of activities and changes in the profile of Brazilian cardiologists, such as in
their compensation, free time and stress levels. As such, medical demography studies are
key to understanding the dynamics of these healthcare professionals.In the study by Faganello et al.,[1] the
authors investigated the profile of Brazilian cardiologists in a cross-sectional study
conducted in 2017, based on questionnaires sent by e-mail to fellow cardiologists of the
Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC) who have been paying their membership fees
regularly. Worth noting is that the likelihood of cardiologists with lower incomes not
paying their membership fees is something that could generate bias in the study, thus
influencing the results on their income. In addition to that, the study does not include
anyone who has been exercising their professional activity without being members of
SBC.Of the 13,462 associates who pay their fees regularly, 70.9% are males, which is similar
to the 2018 medical demographics published by the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine,
which identified 15,516 cardiology specialists, of which 70.1% were males, revealing
that there is no significant difference between men and women joining SBC.[1,2]
Despite the significant difference between the percentage of female and male
cardiologists, in the study concerned, women represented the largest share of the
youngest age groups, which may reveal an increase in the number of women joining the
cardiology community in recent years.[1]One of the main findings of the study was the wage difference between males and females.
In the higher age groups, there was a higher proportion of men (66.5% of the men
reported earning more than BRL 20,000 vs. 31.2% of women), with p < 0.001, even after
adjusting for working hours and age group.[1] According to the article, a possible factor for this wage difference
is the largest proportion of men working in the private sector (14% of women vs. 23.9%
of men), while the proportion of women in the public and academic sectors, which offer
lower pays compared to the private sector, was higher (53% of women vs. 44% of
men).[1] However, other factors
should be considered.[3] A study
conducted by Douglas et al.[4] reported
that factors such as the existence of positive female models and a female-friendly
specialty influence female career choices. As such, the discrepancy between the very
proportion of men and women can be a factor that deter women from engaging in
cardiology, in addition to the fact that there are still few women in leadership
positions.Another important aspect to be addressed, but it is not investigated in the study, is the
presence of sexism in cardiology, which may be one of the factors that contribute to the
lower presence of women in the specialty and their lower compensation. British studies
have revealed that about 6% of the residents in the first years of specialization have
experienced or witnessed sexist language, but this number rises to 15% in the last years
of residence.[3] In view of the above,
approaches that seek to stop sexism at the workplace could lead to greater inflows of
women in cardiology, encouraging them to move up their career ladder and take leadership
positions, thus generating successful female models and better compensation
profiles.Another relevant finding of the study was the level of stress among cardiologists: 64.2%
believe they have adequate levels of stress, 24.3% do not consider themselves stressed
and 11.3% report stress to a great extent, which is mostly caused by poor working
conditions. These data were significantly lower than the North American data, where
burnout was present in 46% of cardiologists.[1] Although this information is important, structured tools for burnout
research should be implemented in future questionnaires on the prevalence of this
syndrome in Brazilian cardiologists. The study also found a high percentage of
cardiologists who report being careless with their own health (39.4%) and who do not
perform any type of physical activity (31%), which contrasts with the US data, where
only 11% of cardiologists do not perform any physical activity.[1]In a modern and increasingly egalitarian world, it is of great relevance to discuss the
factors that potentially lead to wage discrepancy between genders and the low inflow of
women into the cardiology community. Awareness-raising activities and female healthcare
and organizations and medical societies focused on reducing sexism, encouraging the
participation of women in cardiology, and the education of female leaders are key to
changing this scenario. The Brazilian Society of Cardiology, since it was founded 76
years ago, it has had 57 presidents, of which only two of its main representatives were
women: Dr. Bettina Ferro de Souza and Dr. Glaura F. D. Martins (Figure 1). Besides that, due to the high percentage of cardiologists
who do not take good care of their own health, it is necessary to emphasize the
importance of physical and mental healthcare in the medical environment and to promote
improvements in working conditions.
Figure 1
Former Presidents of SBC. Female medical leaders of cardiology in Brazil.
Former Presidents of SBC. Female medical leaders of cardiology in Brazil.
Authors: Hannah C Sinclair; Abhishek Joshi; Chris Allen; Jubin Joseph; S M Afzal Sohaib; Alison Calver; Russell Smith Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Pamela S Douglas; Anne K Rzeszut; C Noel Bairey Merz; Claire S Duvernoy; Sandra J Lewis; Mary Norine Walsh; Linda Gillam Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 14.676