Literature DB >> 7862894

Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction.

A S Killcross1, A Dickinson, T W Robbins.   

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) is a phenomenon observed when repeated, non-reinforced presentation of a stimulus results in a retardation of subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Several recent experiments have suggested that LI is abolished in conditioned suppression paradigms following acute, low doses of amphetamine given during pre-exposure and conditioning. Experiment 1 sought to increase the generality of this finding in an appetitive LI paradigm, using a dose of amphetamine previously shown to disrupt the LI effect in an aversive paradigm (Killcross and Robbins 1993). However, no evidence for any disruption of LI was found. Experiment 2 extended this investigation to additional, higher doses of d-amphetamine, and also examined the role of reinforcer magnitude in the effect. A non-significant trend towards an attenuated LI effect was found, which was reversed by decreases in the concentration of the sucrose reinforcer. Experiments 3 and 4 investigated the influence of systemic amphetamine in aversive paradigms, with specific attention to the increased response to the aversive foot-shock reinforcer found in amphetamine-treated animals. These experiments revealed that the influence of amphetamine on the LI effect in conditioned suppression paradigms could be reversed by reducing the intensity of footshock used in conditioning, thereby paralleling the effect found in the appetitive paradigm. Therefore it is unlikely that a simple attentional account of the abolition of the LI effect in previous experiments can be sustained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7862894     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  46 in total

Review 1.  The psychobiology of reinforcers.

Authors:  N M White; P M Milner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  A functional hypothesis concerning the striatal matrix and patches: mediation of S-R memory and reward.

Authors:  N M White
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.037

3.  Latent inhibition is unaffected by direct dopamine agonists.

Authors:  J Feldon; A Shofel; I Weiner
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Acquisition and retention of a conditioned avoidance response in mice as influenced by pemoline, by some of its derivatives and by some CNS stimulants.

Authors:  C Bianchi; E Marazzi-Uberti
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

5.  Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task.

Authors:  I Baruch; D R Hemsley; J A Gray
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Haloperidol potentiation of latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role at conditioning rather than pre-exposure.

Authors:  S.L. Peters; M.H. Joseph
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Dopaminergic mechanisms and cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. A neurobiological model.

Authors:  M H Joseph; C D Frith; J L Waddington
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-06-21       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Localized intracaudate dopamine D2 receptor activation during the post-training period improves memory for visual or olfactory conditioned emotional responses in rats.

Authors:  N M White; M Viaud
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1991-05

9.  Latent inhibition is not affected by acute or chronic administration of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine.

Authors:  I Weiner; A Izraeli-Telerant; J Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Neural substrates of latent inhibition: the switching model.

Authors:  I Weiner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  19 in total

1.  The on-baseline latent inhibition effect is not counterconditioning.

Authors:  A S Killcross; A Dickinson; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Latent inhibition: interpretation of amphetamine effects in novel paradigms.

Authors:  M H Joseph
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Dopamine-glutamate neuron projections to the nucleus accumbens medial shell and behavioral switching.

Authors:  Susana Mingote; Aliza Amsellem; Abigail Kempf; Stephen Rayport; Nao Chuhma
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons: unaffected by latent inhibition but still due to classical conditioning.

Authors:  B Wynne; J D Delius
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Memory deficits associated with khat (Catha edulis) use in rodents.

Authors:  S T Kimani; N B Patel; P G Kioy
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.584

6.  Contrasting effects of increased and decreased dopamine transmission on latent inhibition in ovariectomized rats and their modulation by 17beta-estradiol: an animal model of menopausal psychosis?

Authors:  Michal Arad; Ina Weiner
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered "wanting" for sucrose reward.

Authors:  C L Wyvell; K C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Transient disruption of attentional performance following escalating amphetamine administration in rats.

Authors:  Robyn L Kondrad; Joshua A Burk
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  A pre-clinical study showing how dopaminergic drugs administered during pre-exposure can impair or facilitate latent inhibition.

Authors:  N A Schmajuk; J A Gray; J A Larrauri
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Haloperidol and clozapine antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  Holger Russig; Aneta Kovacevic; Carol A Murphy; Joram Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.