Literature DB >> 3126470

Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.

L E Sanz1, J A Patterson, R Kamath, G Willett, S W Ahmed, A B Butterfield.   

Abstract

Two hundred ten rats were randomized into one of five study groups to compare standard absorbable sutures with a new synthetic absorbable suture. We evaluated Maxon (polyglyconate), Vicryl (polyglactin), chromic catgut (catgut), and PDS (polydioxanone) with respect to tissue inflammatory reaction, knot security, suture tensile strength, and suture absorption. The results indicate that Maxon and PDS elicited a lower degree of chronic inflammation when compared with Vicryl and chromic catgut. The tensile strengths of Maxon and Vicryl significantly exceeded those of PDS and chromic catgut during the critical period of wound healing. Maxon and PDS retained a larger percentage of tensile strength during the long postoperative period, whereas Vicryl and chromic catgut were mostly absorbed. Maxon is an excellent addition to the armamentarium of the gynecologic surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3126470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

1.  Laser confocal microscopic study of pH profiles of synthetic absorbable fibers upon in vitro hydrolytic degradation.

Authors:  M A Slivka; C C Chu; Y L Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Scar remodeling after strabismus surgery.

Authors:  I H Ludwig
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

3.  Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Braden C Fleming; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Tensile Strength and Durability of Seven Suture Materials in Various pH and Different Conditions: An Experimental Study in Rats.

Authors:  Ramazan Karabulut; Kaan Sonmez; Zafer Turkyilmaz; Barıs Bagbanci; A Can Basaklar; Nuri Kale
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  In vitro evaluation of the response of human tendon-derived stromal cells to a novel electrospun suture for tendon repair.

Authors:  Andrey Nezhentsev; Roxanna E Abhari; Mathew J Baldwin; Jolet Y Mimpen; Edyta Augustyniak; Mark Isaacs; Pierre-Alexis Mouthuy; Andrew J Carr; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Transl Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-15

6.  Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic left lateral liver resection is improved by using staple line reinforcement technique: a case report.

Authors:  Esther C J Consten; Michel Gagner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Effects of suture choice on biomechanics and physeal status after bioenhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair in skeletally immature patients: a large-animal study.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Benedikt Proffen; Chris Peterson; Braden C Fleming; Jason T Machan; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris).

Authors:  Melissa A Salgado; Gregory A Lewbart; Larry S Christian; Emily H Griffith; Jerry McHugh Law
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-11

9.  Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma.

Authors:  Purit Petpiroon; Thanyathorn Vijittrakarnrung; Wasu Supakontanasan; Apichat Tantraworasin; Yanin Suwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-19

10.  Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic left lateral liver resection is improved by using a bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement material in a porcine model.

Authors:  Esther C J Consten; Gregory F Dakin; Jan-Lukas Robertus; Sergio Bardaro; Luca Milone; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.