Literature DB >> 21966138

An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Tensile Strength and Durability of Seven Suture Materials in Various pH and Different Conditions: An Experimental Study in Rats.

Ramazan Karabulut, Kaan Sonmez, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Barıs Bagbanci, A Can Basaklar, Nuri Kale.   

Abstract

Development in material engineering provide many kinds of suture materials to medical fields. The choice of utilization depends on the surgeons decision, the durability, absorbtion times, tensile strength of the suture, and operation site in means of organ and tissue. In this study we aimed to investigate 7 different suture materials in vivo and in vitro conditions to evaluate the properties and durability. Basal tensile strength (TS) values of all sutures were measured and 168 Wistar albino rats were utilised in vivo groups. The sutures were placed in the bladder, stomach, intestine and bile duct (after obstructive jaundice). Urine and bile of rat, pH 1 and pH 10 were used as in vitro conditions. Seven different suture materials (Maxon, Vicryl, Plain Catgut, Surgical Silk, Polypropylene, Caprosyn and Biosyn) were investigated in 9 different in vitro and in vivo conditions. All sutures were chosen to be in size 5/0. In the following 5th day the sutures were tested related to durability and stability. Results were compared stastically using the Mann-Whitney U test and p < 0.05 was considered as stastically significant. Among all the suture materials only polypropylene proved to preserve its stability in vivo and in vitro surveys. Cat-gut and caprosyn lost its TS in all medias. Silk and biosyn lost its TS in all conditions except the stomach and intestines. Maxon also lost its TS in all condition except urine. Utilisation of caprosyn and biosyn in urinary procedures reduces stone formation and infections. The suture of choice in biliary tract should be vicryl, maxon or biosyn since polypropylene preserves its stability that could result in stone formation. In intestinal operations polypropylene, vicryl, and silk could be preferred.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro; In vivo conditions; Suture materials

Year:  2010        PMID: 21966138      PMCID: PMC3077148          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-010-0158-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  10 in total

1.  Knotting technique and suture materials.

Authors:  R P Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Rachel M Clark
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures.

Authors:  E S Debus; D Geiger; M Sailer; J Ederer; A Thiede
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.745

4.  The disintegration of surgical sutures on exposure to pancreatic juice.

Authors:  K Mizuma; P C Lee; J M Howard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions.

Authors:  C C Chu; G Moncrief
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The pH dependence of monofilament sutures on hydrolytic degradation.

Authors:  K Tomihata; M Suzuki; Y Ikada
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001

7.  Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.

Authors:  M A Tolga Muftuoglu; Erkan Ozkan; Abdullah Saglam
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria.

Authors:  Chelsea B Greenberg; Ellen B Davidson; Danielle D Bellmer; Rebecca J Morton; Mark E Payton
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study.

Authors:  Asvin Vasanthan; Keerthana Satheesh; Wyeth Hoopes; Patrick Lucaci; Karen Williams; John Rapley
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.

Authors:  L E Sanz; J A Patterson; R Kamath; G Willett; S W Ahmed; A B Butterfield
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.661

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Omeed Paydar; Anna Tao; Megan LaRocca; Kang Liu; Bradley Genovese; Robert Candler; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Suture Breakage Warning System for Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Syed J Askari; Anna Tao; Yen-Yi Juo; Yuan Dai; Jake Pensa; Robert Candler; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Absorption and Tensility of Bioactive Sutures Prepared for Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Dénes B Horváthy; Gabriella Vácz; Tamás Szabó; Károly Renner; Kinga Vajda; Balázs Sándor; Zsombor Lacza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Effect of Biological Environment on Polyester Surgical Suture's Physical Properties: An Experimental Study in Rats.

Authors:  Dominykas Stankevicius; Justinas Jonusas; Violeta Zalgeviciene; Sigitas Ryliskis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-06

5.  Effectiveness and Safety of Polydioxanone Thread Embedding Acupuncture Compared to Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain: An Assessor-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jae Ik Kim; Chang-Hyun Han; Ju Hyun Jeon; Jin Youp Kim; Ojin Kwon; So-Young Jung; Jun-Hwan Lee; Changsop Yang; Eunseok Kim; Young Il Kim
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Vision-Based Suture Tensile Force Estimation in Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Won-Jo Jung; Kyung-Soo Kwak; Soo-Chul Lim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model.

Authors:  Alper Köycü; Evren Hızal; Ozan Erol; Adnan Fuat Büyüklü
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26

8.  In-vitro evaluation of commonly used beverages on tensile strength of different suture materials used in dental surgeries.

Authors:  Shahabe Saquib Abullais; Nabeeh Abdullah Alqahtani; Raed Mofarh Alkhulban; Sarah Hassan Alamer; Abdul Ahad Khan; Sandeep Pimple
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Bile duct stone formation around a Prolene suture after cholangioenterostomy.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Liang Tao; Xingyu Wu; Lingjun Mou; Xitai Sun; Jianxin Zhou
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Holding Strength of Suture: An Experimental Study Using Porcine Kidney.

Authors:  Ünsal Özkuvanci; Haluk Akpinar; Mert Ali Karadag; Muhammet İrfan Dönmez; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.