| Literature DB >> 31263788 |
Tomoko Hamabata1, Gohta Kinoshita2, Kazuki Kurita2, Ping-Lin Cao1, Motomi Ito3, Jin Murata4, Yoshiteru Komaki4, Yuji Isagi2, Takashi Makino1.
Abstract
Loss of genetic diversity is known to decrease the fitness of species and is a critical factor that increases extinction risk. However, there is little evidence for higher vulnerability and extinction risk in endangered species based on genomic differences between endangered and non-endangered species. This is true even in the case of functional loci, which are more likely to relate to the fitness of species than neutral loci. Here, we compared the genome-wide genetic diversity, proportion of duplicated genes (P D), and accumulation of deleterious variations of endangered island endemic (EIE) plants from four genera with those of their non-endangered (NE) widespread congeners. We focused on exhaustive sequences of expressed genes obtained by RNA sequencing. Most EIE species exhibited significantly lower genetic diversity and P D than NE species. Additionally, all endangered species accumulated deleterious variations. Our findings provide new insights into the genomic traits of EIE species.Entities:
Keywords: Conservation biology; Evolutionary ecology; Evolutionary genetics; Plant genetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31263788 PMCID: PMC6597543 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0490-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Biol ISSN: 2399-3642
Fig. 1Map showing the distribution sites of the plant species used in this study a, and enlarged map of the Ogasawara Islands, where the six endangered plant species in this study are distributing b. Pictures boxed in red show the endangered island endemic (EIE) species with its classification in the Red List category (bottom left), and pictures boxed in white show the non-endangered (NE) species in each genus. Each painted island map on the right side of the picture of endangered species indicates its distribution; black-painted means distributing in the island, gray-painted means extinct in the island, and white-painted means not-distributing in the island. The number below the painted island map indicates the estimated current number of individuals of the endangered species. The Red List category is as follows; CR is Critically Endangered, EN is Endangered, and VU is Vulnerable. Distribution ranges of the non-endangered species are as follows; A. pygmaea in Kyushu and the Ryukyu Archipelago, A shikotanensis in Honshu, C. lanceolatam in Honshu, Korean Peninsula and Mainland China, C. keiskeanum in Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Korean Peninsula and Mainland China, C. triplicata in Kyushu, the Ryukyu Archipelago, Taiwan, and Mainland China, and M. candidum the Ryukyu Archipelago, Taiwan, and Mainland China
Fig. 2Mean values of the number of synonymous SNVs for heterozygous loci (counts per kb). The values compared between endangered island endemic (EIE) and non-endangered (NE) species within the same genus are connected by lines between species
Species category of Endangered island endemic (EIE) or Non-endangered (NE), proportions of duplicated genes (PD), and mean values of the number of synonymous SNVs at transcripts with heterozygous loci (the counts per kb), the proportion of non-synonymous SNVs to total SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci, the proportion of nonsense SNVs to total non-synonymous SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci, the proportion of deleterious variations in non-synonymous SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci estimated by PROVEAN and by SIFT
| EIE or NE |
| Number of syn SNVs | Nonsyn SNVs/total SNVs | Nonsense SNVs/nonsyn SNVs | Proportion of deleterious variations in nonsyn SNVs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By PROVEAN | By SIFT | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| | |||||||
| 100PE | EIE | 0.705 | 0.027 | 0.723 | 0.048 | 0.495 | 0.434 |
| 150PE-1 | EIE | 0.721 | 0.019 | 0.670 | 0.036 | 0.470 | 0.383 |
| 150PE-2 | EIE | 0.696 | 0.022 | 0.669 | 0.052 | 0.444 | 0.359 |
| 150PE-3 | EIE | 0.716 | 0.023 | 0.662 | 0.046 | 0.465 | 0.349 |
| 150PE-4 | EIE | 0.713 | 0.021 | 0.662 | 0.033 | 0.422 | 0.325 |
| Average | 0.710 | 0.022 | 0.677 | 0.043 | 0.459 | 0.370 | |
|
| |||||||
| 100PE | NE | 0.715 | 0.025 | 0.699 | 0.040 | 0.464 | 0.389 |
| 150PE-1 | NE | 0.715 | 0.030 | 0.597 | 0.035 | 0.437 | 0.352 |
| 150PE-2 | NE | 0.730 | 0.024 | 0.686 | 0.043 | 0.397 | 0.344 |
| 150PE-3 | NE | 0.721 | 0.025 | 0.633 | 0.044 | 0.389 | 0.332 |
| Average | 0.720 | 0.026 | 0.654 | 0.041 | 0.422 | 0.354 | |
| | |||||||
| 100PE | NE | 0.740 | 0.451 | 0.502 | 0.012 | 0.318 | 0.194 |
| 150PE-1 | NE | 0.734 | 0.414 | 0.512 | 0.023 | 0.320 | 0.208 |
| 150PE-2 | NE | 0.748 | 0.456 | 0.497 | 0.018 | 0.317 | 0.197 |
| Average | 0.741 | 0.440 | 0.503 | 0.017 | 0.319 | 0.200 | |
|
| |||||||
| | |||||||
| 100PE | EIE | 0.696 | 0.170 | 0.593 | 0.020 | 0.388 | 0.256 |
| 90PE | EIE | 0.707 | 0.200 | 0.589 | 0.024 | 0.385 | 0.226 |
| 150PE-1 | EIE | 0.642 | 0.149 | 0.611 | 0.035 | 0.414 | 0.281 |
| 150PE-2 | EIE | 0.659 | 0.153 | 0.610 | 0.035 | 0.427 | 0.282 |
| Average | 0.676 | 0.168 | 0.601 | 0.029 | 0.404 | 0.261 | |
| | |||||||
| 100PE | EIE | 0.721 | 0.133 | 0.599 | 0.024 | 0.386 | 0.260 |
| | |||||||
| 90PE-1 | EIE | 0.679 | 0.128 | 0.577 | 0.026 | 0.377 | 0.231 |
| 90PE-2 | EIE | 0.696 | 0.130 | 0.608 | 0.033 | 0.377 | 0.257 |
| Average | 0.687 | 0.129 | 0.593 | 0.030 | 0.377 | 0.244 | |
| | |||||||
| 100PE | NE | 0.730 | 0.344 | 0.486 | 0.015 | 0.275 | 0.184 |
| 150PE-1 | NE | 0.775 | 0.158 | 0.496 | 0.025 | 0.290 | 0.197 |
| 150PE-2 | NE | 0.771 | 0.260 | 0.488 | 0.021 | 0.269 | 0.188 |
| Average | 0.759 | 0.254 | 0.490 | 0.020 | 0.278 | 0.190 | |
| | |||||||
| 90PE | NE | 0.717 | 0.283 | 0.512 | 0.017 | 0.320 | 0.202 |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| 150PE-1 | EIE | 0.709 | 0.119 | 0.591 | 0.023 | 0.361 | 0.264 |
| 150PE-2 | EIE | 0.716 | 0.116 | 0.584 | 0.031 | 0.360 | 0.253 |
| 150PE-3 | EIE | 0.702 | 0.150 | 0.567 | 0.025 | 0.349 | 0.248 |
| Average | 0.709 | 0.128 | 0.581 | 0.026 | 0.357 | 0.255 | |
| | |||||||
| 150PE-1 | NE | 0.736 | 0.261 | 0.505 | 0.015 | 0.261 | 0.214 |
| 150PE-2 | NE | 0.758 | 0.262 | 0.508 | 0.025 | 0.260 | 0.206 |
| 150PE-3 | NE | 0.760 | 0.244 | 0.505 | 0.028 | 0.267 | 0.214 |
| Average | 0.752 | 0.256 | 0.506 | 0.023 | 0.263 | 0.211 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| 150PE-1 | EIE | 0.695 | 0.101 | 0.585 | 0.018 | 0.381 | 0.261 |
| 150PE-2 | EIE | 0.702 | 0.100 | 0.588 | 0.017 | 0.369 | 0.248 |
| 150PE-3 | EIE | 0.704 | 0.099 | 0.614 | 0.022 | 0.378 | 0.255 |
| Average | 0.701 | 0.100 | 0.596 | 0.019 | 0.376 | 0.255 | |
| | |||||||
| 150PE-1 | NE | 0.692 | 0.326 | 0.511 | 0.012 | 0.309 | 0.212 |
| 150PE-2 | NE | 0.721 | 0.329 | 0.474 | 0.013 | 0.286 | 0.207 |
| 150PE-3 | NE | 0.697 | 0.427 | 0.503 | 0.013 | 0.280 | 0.204 |
| Average | 0.704 | 0.361 | 0.496 | 0.013 | 0.292 | 0.208 | |
P values of t test compared the mean values of the PD, the number of synonymous SNVs at transcripts with heterozygous loci (the counts per kb), the proportion of non-synonymous SNVs to total SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci, the proportion of nonsense SNVs to total non-synonymous SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci, and proportion of deleterious variations in non-synonymous SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci estimated by PROVEAN and SIFT between endangered island endemic [EIE] and non-endangered [NE] species
| | 0.131 |
| Synonymous SNV | 0.103 |
| Nonsyn/Syn SNV | 0.372 |
| Loss of function | 0.595 |
| PROVEAN | 0.115 |
| SIFT | 0.503 |
| |
|
| Synonymous SNV | |
| Nonsyn/Syn SNV | |
| Loss of function |
|
| PROVEAN | |
| SIFT |
|
Fig. 3Mean values of the proportion of deleterious variations in non-synonymous SNVs on transcripts with heterozygous loci estimated by PROVEAN a, and the proportions of SNVs that varied by nonsense SNVs (loss-of-function SNVs) to total non-synonymous SNVs b. The values compared between EIE and NE species within the same genus are connected by lines between species
Fig. 4Proportion of duplicated genes for endangered and non-endangered species. The values compared between EIE and NE species within the same genus are connected by lines between species