Literature DB >> 23307899

Significance of population size on the fixation of nonsynonymous mutations in genes under varying levels of selection pressure.

Sankar Subramanian1.   

Abstract

Previous studies observed a higher ratio of divergences at nonsynonymous and synonymous sites (ω = dN/dS) in species with a small population size compared to that estimated for those with a large population size. Here we examined the theoretical relationship between ω, effective population size (Ne), and selection coefficient (s). Our analysis revealed that when purifying selection is high, ω of species with small Ne is much higher than that of species with large Ne. However the difference between the two ω reduces with the decline in selection pressure (s → 0). We examined this relationship using primate and rodent genes and found that the ω estimated for highly constrained genes of primates was up to 2.9 times higher than that obtained for their orthologous rodent genes. Conversely, for genes under weak purifying selection the ω of primates was only 17% higher than that of rodents. When tissue specificity was used as a proxy for selection pressure we found that the ω of broadly expressed genes of primates was up to 2.1-fold higher than that of their rodent counterparts and this difference was only 27% for tissue specific genes. Since most of the nonsynonymous mutations in constrained or broadly expressed genes are deleterious, fixation of these mutations is influenced by Ne. This results in a higher ω of these genes in primates compared to those from rodents. Conversely, the majority of nonsynonymous mutations in less-constrained or tissue-specific genes are neutral or nearly neutral and therefore fixation of them is largely independent of Ne, which leads to the similarity of ω in primates and rodents.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307899      PMCID: PMC3584012          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.147900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  29 in total

1.  Elevated rates of nonsynonymous substitution in island birds.

Authors:  K P Johnson; J Seger
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley; Nick G C Smith; Daniel Gaffney
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Population size and molecular evolution on islands.

Authors:  Megan Woolfit; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals.

Authors:  Konstantin Popadin; Leonard V Polishchuk; Leila Mamirova; Dmitry Knorre; Konstantin Gunbin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fixation of deleterious mutations at critical positions in human proteins.

Authors:  Sankar Subramanian
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons.

Authors:  T Ota; M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  An examination of the generation-time effect on molecular evolution.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria.

Authors:  N A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes.

Authors:  L Duret; D Mouchiroud; M Gouy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Evidence for variation in the effective population size of animal mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Gwenael Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ecology has contrasting effects on genetic variation within species versus rates of molecular evolution across species in water beetles.

Authors:  Tomochika Fujisawa; Alfried P Vogler; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The other side of the coin: the tumor-suppressive aspect of oncogenes and the oncogenic aspect of tumor-suppressive genes, such as those along the CCND-CDK4/6-RB axis.

Authors:  Xiaomin Lou; Ju Zhang; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Morphology and genome of a snailfish from the Mariana Trench provide insights into deep-sea adaptation.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Yanjun Shen; Yongzhi Yang; Xiaoni Gan; Guichun Liu; Kuang Hu; Yongxin Li; Zhaoming Gao; Li Zhu; Guoyong Yan; Lisheng He; Xiujuan Shan; Liandong Yang; Suxiang Lu; Honghui Zeng; Xiangyu Pan; Chang Liu; Yuan Yuan; Chenguang Feng; Wenjie Xu; Chenglong Zhu; Wuhan Xiao; Yang Dong; Wen Wang; Qiang Qiu; Shunping He
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Recent positive selection has acted on genes encoding proteins with more interactions within the whole human interactome.

Authors:  Pierre Luisi; David Alvarez-Ponce; Marc Pybus; Mario A Fares; Jaume Bertranpetit; Hafid Laayouni
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Just like the rest of evolution in Mother Nature, the evolution of cancers may be driven by natural selection, and not by haphazard mutations.

Authors:  Ju Zhang; Xiaomin Lou; Lucas Zellmer; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-09-22

6.  Endangered island endemic plants have vulnerable genomes.

Authors:  Tomoko Hamabata; Gohta Kinoshita; Kazuki Kurita; Ping-Lin Cao; Motomi Ito; Jin Murata; Yoshiteru Komaki; Yuji Isagi; Takashi Makino
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of the Loaches Triplophysa bleekeri and Triplophysa rosa Reveals Potential Mechanisms of Eye Degeneration.

Authors:  Qingyuan Zhao; Renyi Zhang; Yingqi Xiao; Yabing Niu; Feng Shao; Yanping Li; Zuogang Peng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Efficient purging of deleterious mutations in plants with haploid selfing.

Authors:  Péter Szövényi; Nicolas Devos; David J Weston; Xiaohan Yang; Zsófia Hock; Jonathan A Shaw; Kentaro K Shimizu; Stuart F McDaniel; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Influence of Effective Population Size on Genes under Varying Levels of Selection Pressure.

Authors:  Sankar Subramanian
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  In Cold Blood: Compositional Bias and Positive Selection Drive the High Evolutionary Rate of Vampire Bats Mitochondrial Genomes.

Authors:  Fidel Botero-Castro; Marie-Ka Tilak; Fabienne Justy; François Catzeflis; Frédéric Delsuc; Emmanuel J P Douzery
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.