| Literature DB >> 31263163 |
Ching-Ti Liu1, Jordi Merino2,3,4, Denis Rybin5, Daniel DiCorpo5, Kelly S Benke6, Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham7, Mickaël Canouil8, Tanguy Corre9,10,11, Harald Grallert12,13, Aaron Isaacs14,15, Zoltan Kutalik9,11, Jari Lahti16,17, Letizia Marullo18, Carola Marzi12,13, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik19, Ghislain Rocheleau8,20,21,22,23, Rico Rueedi10,11, Chiara Scapoli18, Niek Verweij24, Nicole Vogelzangs25, Sara M Willems14, Loïc Yengo8, Stephan J L Bakker26, John Beilby27,28,29, Jennie Hui27,28,29,30, Eero Kajantie31, Martina Müller-Nurasyid32,33,34,35, Wolfgang Rathmann36, Beverley Balkau37,38,39, Sven Bergmann10,11,40, Johan G Eriksson31,41,42, Jose C Florez2,3,4,43, Philippe Froguel8,44, Tamara Harris45, Joseph Hung29,46, Alan L James29,46,47, Maryam Kavousi48, Iva Miljkovic49, Arthur W Musk29,30,46, Lyle J Palmer50, Annette Peters13,51, Ronan Roussel52,53,54, Pim van der Harst24,55,56, Cornelia M van Duijn14, Peter Vollenweider57, Inês Barroso58, Inga Prokopenko59,60,61, Josée Dupuis5,62, James B Meigs3,43,63, Nabila Bouatia-Naji64,65.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects the health of millions of people worldwide. The identification of genetic determinants associated with changes in glycemia over time might illuminate biological features that precede the development of T2D. Here we conducted a genome-wide association study of longitudinal fasting glucose changes in up to 13,807 non-diabetic individuals of European descent from nine cohorts. Fasting glucose change over time was defined as the slope of the line defined by multiple fasting glucose measurements obtained over up to 14 years of observation. We tested for associations of genetic variants with inverse-normal transformed fasting glucose change over time adjusting for age at baseline, sex, and principal components of genetic variation. We found no genome-wide significant association (P < 5 × 10-8) with fasting glucose change over time. Seven loci previously associated with T2D, fasting glucose or HbA1c were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with fasting glucose change over time. Limited power influences unambiguous interpretation, but these data suggest that genetic effects on fasting glucose change over time are likely to be small. A public version of the data provides a genomic resource to combine with future studies to evaluate shared genetic links with T2D and other metabolic risk traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31263163 PMCID: PMC6602949 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45823-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Genome-wide association results for genetic variants with an association p-value < 5 × 10−6.
| SNP | Chr | BPa | EAb | NEAb | EAFb | Beta | SE | P | Directionc | HetPVald | N | RefGene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs7114256 | 11 | 78539553 | A | G | 0.92 | 0.129 | 0.03 | 8.78E-07 | +++++−?++ | 0.74 | 13,003 |
|
| rs606243 | 2 | 4487817 | A | G | 0.74 | −0.078 | 0.02 | 1.42E-06 | ------??- | 0.36 | 11,862 |
|
| rs17496593 | 5 | 104254353 | A | C | 0.91 | −0.111 | 0.02 | 2.12E-06 | -----+?-- | 0.21 | 13,005 |
|
| rs17496653 | 5 | 104255187 | A | G | 0.09 | 0.110 | 0.02 | 2.58E-06 | +++++−?++ | 0.20 | 13,005 |
|
| rs17562893 | 5 | 104266799 | T | G | 0.09 | 0.108 | 0.02 | 3.78E-06 | +++++−?++ | 0.19 | 12,994 |
|
| rs7103693 | 11 | 78535307 | T | C | 0.08 | −0.120 | 0.03 | 4.19E-06 | -----+?-- | 0.79 | 13,003 |
|
aPhysical Position (base pair) in build 36.
bEA: effect allele, NEA: non-effect allele, EAF: effect allele frequency.
cThe sign of EA effect and the order of Cohorts are BHS, COLAUS, DESIR, ERGO, FHS, HBCS, KORA, PREVEND, SARDIANA.
dHetPVal: P-value for testing for heterogeneity.
eRefGen: closest reference gene.
Figure 1Regional association plot of rs7114256. Results from 500 kb regional associations for fasting glucose change over time, centered at rs7114256. The x axis denotes genomic position build 36 and the y axis denotes the −log(P-value) and recombination rate (blue line). The purple diamond symbol represents the most-associated SNP within the region, rs7114256. The color of each symbol indicates the LD value with rs7114256 based on the HapMap2 CEU sample.
Association results of the genetic variants showing a nominal significant signal for fasting glucose change (p < 0.05) in known T2D or glycemic trait locia.
| SNP | Chr | BPb | Locus | EAb | NEAb | EAFb | Beta | SE | P | Directionc | HetPVald | N | HetISq |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||
| rs6943153 | 7 | 50759073 |
| T | C | 0.30 | −0.044 | 0.01 | 0.002 | -------+- | 0.4257 | 13,800 | 1 |
| rs11619319 | 13 | 27385599 |
| A | G | 0.77 | 0.039 | 0.02 | 0.011 | +++++−+++ | 0.6785 | 13,807 | 0 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| rs10965248e | 9 | 22122878 |
| A | G | 0.18 | −0.040 | 0.02 | 0.019 | ?--+--+-- | 0.06878 | 12,523 | 47 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| rs2073285 | 17 | 73628956 |
| T | C | 0.20 | 0.079 | 0.03 | 0.002 | +?++?+?+? | 0.05396 | 5,098 | 57 |
| rs4783565 | 16 | 67307691 |
| A | G | 0.32 | 0.043 | 0.02 | 0.006 | ?++++++?+ | 0.4491 | 11,356 | 0 |
| rs579459 | 9 | 135143989 |
| T | C | 0.78 | −0.041 | 0.02 | 0.008 | ------+-+ | 0.2827 | 13,779 | 18 |
| rs11619319 | 13 | 27385599 |
| A | G | 0.77 | 0.039 | 0.02 | 0.011 | +++++−+++ | 0.6785 | 13,807 | 0 |
| rs10823343 | 10 | 70761019 |
| A | G | 0.75 | −0.037 | 0.02 | 0.039 | -+-----?? | 0.3766 | 8,809 | 6.7 |
aScott et al.[13], Scott et al.[15], Wheeler et al.[16].
bBP:Physical Position (base pair) in build 36. EA: effect allele, NEA: non-effect allele, EAF: effect allele frequency.
cThe sign of EA effect and the order of Cohorts are BHS, COLAUS, DESIR, ERGO, FHS, HBCS, KORA, PREVEND, SARDIANA.
dHetPVal: P-value for testing for heterogeneity.
eUsing proxy SNP rs10965250 (r2 = 0.97 with rs10965248).
Figure 2Power analysis. The relationship between power and variation explained in the trait of interest by a genetic variant with a sample size of 13,807 at a significance level of 5 × 10−8. The y-axis represents the power and the x-axis the variance explained by a genetic variant. The horizontal red line represents the power of 80%. This Figure shows that we had 80% power to detect a genetic variant that explained at least 0.28% of variation in fasting glucose change over time.