Literature DB >> 31263035

Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control: Review and Recommendations.

Tony Badrick1, Andreas Bietenbeck2, Mark A Cervinski3,4, Alex Katayev5, Huub H van Rossum6,7, Tze Ping Loh8.   

Abstract

For many years the concept of patient-based quality control (QC) has been discussed and implemented in hematology laboratories; however, the techniques have not been widely implemented in clinical chemistry. This is mainly because of the complexity of this form of QC, as it needs to be optimized for each population and often for each analyte. However, the clear advantages of this form of QC, together with the ongoing realization of the shortcomings of "conventional" QC, have driven a need to provide guidance to laboratories to assist in deploying patient-based QC. This overview describes the components of a patient-based QC system (calculation algorithm, block size, truncation limits, control limits) and the relationship of these to the analyte being controlled. We also discuss the need for patient-based QC system optimization using patient data from the individual testing laboratory to reliably detect systematic errors while ensuring that there are few false alarms. The term patient-based real-time quality control covers many activities that use data from patient samples to detect analytical errors. These activities include the monitoring of patient population parameters such as the mean or median analyte value or using single within-patient changes such as the delta check. In this report, we will restrict the discussion to population-based parameters. This overview is intended to serve as a guide for the implementation of a patient-based QC system. The report does not cover the clinical evaluation of the population.
© 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31263035     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.305482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  10 in total

1.  Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Is the Leading External Quality Assurance Predictor of ISO15189 Compliance for Pathology Laboratories.

Authors:  Brett A Lidbury; Gus Koerbin; Alice M Richardson; Tony Badrick
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-13

2.  An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits.

Authors:  Tze Ping Loh; Rui Zhen Tan; Chun Yee Lim; Corey Markus
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.941

3.  Integrating moving average control procedures into the risk-based quality control plan in small-volume medical laboratories.

Authors:  Vera Lukić; Svetlana Ignjatović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.515

4.  Patient-based quality control for glucometers: using the moving sum of positive patient results and moving average.

Authors:  Chun Yee Lim; Tony Badrick; Tze Ping Loh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 5.  Biological variation: Understanding why it is so important?

Authors:  Tony Badrick
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  Impact of combining data from multiple instruments on performance of patient-based real-time quality control.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhou; Tze Ping Loh; Tony Badrick; Chun Yee Lim
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.313

7.  Intelligent Quality Management 2 with IntraSpect™ technology for quality control of GEM® Premier™ 5000 blood gas analyzers- A novel application of the patient sample as its own control.

Authors:  James O Westgard; Jose Cervera
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2022-04-08

8.  A study of the moving rate of positive results for use in a patient-based real-time quality control program on a procalcitonin point-of-care testing analyzer.

Authors:  Yili He; Daqing Gu; Xiangzhi Kong; Zhiqiang Feng; Weishang Lin; Yunfeng Cai
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Moving average procedures as an additional tool for real-time analytical quality control: challenges and opportunities of implementation in small-volume medical laboratories.

Authors:  Vera Lukić; Svetlana Ignjatović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  Comparison and optimization of various moving patient-based real-time quality control procedures for serum sodium.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Qian Yu; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xiaoling Chen
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.