Literature DB >> 31255629

Blood pressure trajectory and category and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in nulliparous women.

Alisse Hauspurg1, Samuel Parry2, Brian M Mercer3, William Grobman4, Tamera Hatfield5, Robert M Silver6, Corette B Parker7, David M Haas8, Jay D Iams9, George R Saade10, Ronald J Wapner11, Uma M Reddy12, Hyagriv Simhan13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently updated American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines redefine blood pressure categories as stage 1 hypertension (systolic, 130-139 mm Hg or diastolic, 80-89 mm Hg), elevated (systolic, 120-129 mm Hg and diastolic, <80 mm Hg), and normal (<120/<80 mm Hg), but their relevance to an obstetric population is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the risk of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia based on early pregnancy blood pressure category and trajectory. STUDY
DESIGN: We utilized data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be cohort, a prospective observational study of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies conducted at 8 clinical sites between 2010 and 2014. Women included in this analysis had no known history of prepregnancy hypertension (blood pressure, ≥140/90 mm Hg) or diabetes. We compared the frequency of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, among women based on ACC/AHA blood pressure category at a first-trimester study visit and blood pressure trajectory between study visits in the first and second trimesters. Blood pressure trajectories were categorized based on blood pressure difference between visits 1 and 2 as stable (<5 mm Hg difference), upward (≥5 mm Hg), or downward (≤-5 mm Hg). Associations of blood pressure category and trajectory with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension were assessed via univariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression analysis with covariates identified a priori.
RESULTS: A total of 8899 women were included in the analysis. Study visit 1 occurred at a mean gestational age of 11.6 ± 1.5 weeks and study visit 2 at a mean gestational age of 19.0 ± 1.6 weeks. First-trimester blood pressure category was significantly associated with both preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, with increasing blood pressure category associated with a higher risk of all hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Elevated blood pressure was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.02) and stage 1 hypertension was associated with adjusted relative risk of 2.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.57) of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Stage 1 hypertension was associated with the highest risk of preeclampsia with severe features, with an adjusted relative risk of 2.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.38-8.74). Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure trajectories were also significantly associated with the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy independent of blood pressure category (P < .001). Women with a blood pressure categorized as normal and with an upward systolic trajectory had a 41% increased risk of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (adjusted relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.65) compared to women with a downward systolic trajectory.
CONCLUSION: In nulliparous women, blood pressure category and trajectory in early pregnancy are independently associated with risk of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Our study demonstrates that blood pressure categories with lower thresholds than those traditionally used to identify individuals as hypertensive may identify more women at risk for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; BP trajectory; chronic hypertension; gestational hypertension; guideline; hypertensive disorder; mild hypertension; preeclampsia; pregnancy; stage 1 hypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31255629      PMCID: PMC6732036          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Predictable blood pressure variability in healthy and complicated pregnancies.

Authors:  R C Hermida; D E Ayala; M Iglesias
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Blood pressure variability during gestation in healthy and complicated pregnancies.

Authors:  D E Ayala; R C Hermida; A Mojón; J R Fernández; I Silva; R Ucieda; M Iglesias
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b).

Authors:  David M Haas; Corette B Parker; Deborah A Wing; Samuel Parry; William A Grobman; Brian M Mercer; Hyagriv N Simhan; Matthew K Hoffman; Robert M Silver; Pathik Wadhwa; Jay D Iams; Matthew A Koch; Steve N Caritis; Ronald J Wapner; M Sean Esplin; Michal A Elovitz; Tatiana Foroud; Alan M Peaceman; George R Saade; Marian Willinger; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Aspirin Effect on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Associated With Stage 1 Hypertension in a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Alisse Hauspurg; Elizabeth F Sutton; Janet M Catov; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Daniel L Rolnik; David Wright; Liona C Poon; Neil O'Gorman; Argyro Syngelaki; Catalina de Paco Matallana; Ranjit Akolekar; Simona Cicero; Deepa Janga; Mandeep Singh; Francisca S Molina; Nicola Persico; Jacques C Jani; Walter Plasencia; George Papaioannou; Kinneret Tenenbaum-Gavish; Hamutal Meiri; Sveinbjorn Gizurarson; Kate Maclagan; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prehypertension during pregnancy and risk of small for gestational age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunxia Cao; Wei Cai; Xiulong Niu; Jiaxi Fu; Jianmei Ni; Qiong Lei; Jianmin Niu; Xin Zhou; Yuming Li
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2018-09-25

9.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate Bramham; Bethany Parnell; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Paul T Seed; Lucilla Poston; Lucy C Chappell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-04-15
View more
  12 in total

1.  Early Pregnancy Blood Pressure Patterns Identify Risk of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Racial and Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Erica P Gunderson; Mara Greenberg; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Cassidy Tierney; James M Roberts; Alan S Go; Wei Tao; Stacey E Alexeeff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  ACC-AHA Diagnostic Criteria for Hypertension in Pregnancy Identifies Patients at Intermediate Risk of Adverse Outcomes.

Authors:  Kristin C Darwin; Jerome J Federspiel; Brittany L Schuh; Ahmet A Baschat; Arthur J Vaught
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Clustering Longitudinal Blood Pressure Trajectories to Examine Heterogeneity in Outcomes Among Preeclampsia Cases and Controls.

Authors:  Kyle R Roell; Quaker E Harmon; Kari Klungsøyr; Anna E Bauer; Per Magnus; Stephanie M Engel
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 9.897

Review 4.  Body of Evidence in Favor of Adopting 130/80 mm Hg as New Blood Pressure Cut-Off for All the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Giovanni Sisti; Belinda Williams
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Prevalence of Hypertension Among Pregnant Women When Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines and Association With Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.

Authors:  Natalie A Bello; Hui Zhou; T Craig Cheetham; Eliza Miller; Darios T Getahun; Michael J Fassett; Kristi Reynolds
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Pre-pregnancy blood pressure and pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Young Mi Jung; Gyu Chul Oh; Eunjin Noh; Hae-Young Lee; Min-Jeong Oh; Joong Shin Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Seung Mi Lee; Geum Joon Cho
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with moderate elevations in blood pressure or blood glucose in Ugandan women; a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jack Milln; Betty Nakabuye; Barnabas Natamba; Isaac Sekitoleko; Michael Mubiru; Arthur Namara; Samuel Tumwesigire; Tino Salome; Mandy Mirembe; Ayoub Kakanda; Brian Agaba; Faridah Nansubuga; Daniel Zaake; Ben Ayiko; Herbert Kalema; Sarah Nakubulwa; Musa Sekikubo; Annettee Nakimuli; Emily L Webb; Moffat J Nyirenda
Journal:  AJOG Glob Rep       Date:  2021-05

8.  Early Pregnancy Blood Pressure Elevations and Risk for Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Sutton; Sarah C Rogan; Samia Lopa; Danielle Sharbaugh; Matthew F Muldoon; Janet M Catov
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 7.623

9.  Gestational systolic blood pressure trajectories and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in Chinese women.

Authors:  Haoyue Teng; Yumei Wang; Bing Han; Jieyu Liu; Yingying Cao; Jiaxiang Wang; Xiaoyan Zhu; Jiaojiao Fu; Qi Ling; Chengqi Xiao; Zhongxiao Wan; Jieyun Yin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Preventive effect of aspirin on preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women with stage 1 hypertension.

Authors:  Jing Huai; Li Lin; Juan Juan; Jiahui Chen; Boya Li; Yuchun Zhu; Mengting Yu; Huixia Yang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.