Haoyue Teng1,2, Yumei Wang3, Bing Han4, Jieyu Liu1, Yingying Cao5, Jiaxiang Wang1, Xiaoyan Zhu6, Jiaojiao Fu1,2, Qi Ling3, Chengqi Xiao1, Zhongxiao Wan7,8, Jieyun Yin9,10. 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Preventive and Translational Medicine for Geriatric Diseases, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, 199 Renai Road, Suzhou, 215123, China. 2. Department Of Epidemiology And Health Statistics, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. 3. Department of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of TaiCang, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. 5. Women and Children Health Care Center of Taicang, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. 6. Suzhou Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China. 7. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Preventive and Translational Medicine for Geriatric Diseases, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, 199 Renai Road, Suzhou, 215123, China. zxwan@suda.edu.cn. 8. Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China. zxwan@suda.edu.cn. 9. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Preventive and Translational Medicine for Geriatric Diseases, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, 199 Renai Road, Suzhou, 215123, China. jyyin@suda.edu.cn. 10. Department Of Epidemiology And Health Statistics, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. jyyin@suda.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Associations between trajectories of systolic blood pressure (SBP) during pregnancy and pregnant outcomes remain unclear and disparate. METHODS: Data of 20,353 mothers without chronic hypertension and who delivered live singletons between January, 2014 and November, 2019, was extracted from Taicang register-based cohort. Based on SBP measured during 10 to 40 weeks of gestation, SBP trajectories were explored using latent class growth mixture model, and their associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Six heterogeneous SBP trajectories were identified: low delayed-increasing (7.47%), low reverse-increasing (21.88%), low-stable (19.13%), medium-stable (21.64%), medium reverse-increasing (16.47%), and high stable (13.41%) trajectories. The high-stable trajectory had SBP around 125 mmHg in the 10th gestational week, and increased slightly onwards. When compared with the low-stable trajectory, the high-stable trajectory had maximally adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 5.28 (2.76-10.10), 1.30 (1.13-1.50), 1.53 (1.12-2.08), 1.32 (1.06-1.65) and 1.64 (1.08-2.48) for gestational hypertension (GH), early-term delivery (ETD), preterm delivery (PTD), small for gestational age and low birth weight (LBW), respectively. Besides, the medium reverse-increasing trajectory showed significantly increased risk of GH and ETD, while the medium-stable trajectory had significantly elevated risk of ETD and PTD. Notably, SBP trajectories slightly but significantly improved risk discrimination of GH, ETD and LBW, over traditional risk factors. CONCLUSION: Women with different SBP trajectories were at varied risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Meanwhile, our study suggested that BP monitoring during pregnancy is necessary, especially for women with high SBP in early pregnancy or upward trajectory.
BACKGROUND: Associations between trajectories of systolic blood pressure (SBP) during pregnancy and pregnant outcomes remain unclear and disparate. METHODS: Data of 20,353 mothers without chronic hypertension and who delivered live singletons between January, 2014 and November, 2019, was extracted from Taicang register-based cohort. Based on SBP measured during 10 to 40 weeks of gestation, SBP trajectories were explored using latent class growth mixture model, and their associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Six heterogeneous SBP trajectories were identified: low delayed-increasing (7.47%), low reverse-increasing (21.88%), low-stable (19.13%), medium-stable (21.64%), medium reverse-increasing (16.47%), and high stable (13.41%) trajectories. The high-stable trajectory had SBP around 125 mmHg in the 10th gestational week, and increased slightly onwards. When compared with the low-stable trajectory, the high-stable trajectory had maximally adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 5.28 (2.76-10.10), 1.30 (1.13-1.50), 1.53 (1.12-2.08), 1.32 (1.06-1.65) and 1.64 (1.08-2.48) for gestational hypertension (GH), early-term delivery (ETD), preterm delivery (PTD), small for gestational age and low birth weight (LBW), respectively. Besides, the medium reverse-increasing trajectory showed significantly increased risk of GH and ETD, while the medium-stable trajectory had significantly elevated risk of ETD and PTD. Notably, SBP trajectories slightly but significantly improved risk discrimination of GH, ETD and LBW, over traditional risk factors. CONCLUSION:Women with different SBP trajectories were at varied risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Meanwhile, our study suggested that BP monitoring during pregnancy is necessary, especially for women with high SBP in early pregnancy or upward trajectory.
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alisse Hauspurg; Samuel Parry; Brian M Mercer; William Grobman; Tamera Hatfield; Robert M Silver; Corette B Parker; David M Haas; Jay D Iams; George R Saade; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Hyagriv Simhan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Kate Tilling; Abigail Fraser; Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Vesna D Garovic; Ralf Dechend; Thomas Easterling; S Ananth Karumanchi; Suzanne McMurtry Baird; Laura A Magee; Sarosh Rana; Jane V Vermunt; Phyllis August Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 9.897