Literature DB >> 32446257

ACC-AHA Diagnostic Criteria for Hypertension in Pregnancy Identifies Patients at Intermediate Risk of Adverse Outcomes.

Kristin C Darwin1, Jerome J Federspiel1,2, Brittany L Schuh1, Ahmet A Baschat1, Arthur J Vaught1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients who are normotensive, hypertensive by Stage I American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) criteria, and hypertensive by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) criteria. STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective first trimester cohort study between 2007 and 2010 at three institutions in Baltimore, MD, was conducted. Blood pressure at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation was classified as (1) normotensive (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <130 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <80 mm Hg); (2) hypertensive by Stage I ACC-AHA criteria (SBP 130-139 mm Hg or DBP 80-89 mm Hg); or (3) hypertensive by ACOG criteria (SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg). Primary outcomes included preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, and preterm birth.
RESULTS: Among 3,422 women enrolled, 2,976 with delivery data from singleton pregnancies of nonanomalous fetuses were included. In total, 20.2% met hypertension criteria (Stage I ACC-AHA n = 254, 8.5%; ACOG n = 347, 11.7%). The Stage I ACC-AHA group's risk for developing preeclampsia was threefold higher than the normotensive group (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.40-5.70). The Stage I ACC-AHA group had lower preeclampsia risk than the ACOG group but the difference was not significant (aRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.55-1.37). The Stage I ACC-AHA group was more likely than the normotensive group to deliver preterm (aRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.01) and deliver an SGA neonate (aRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.12). The Stage I ACC-AHA group was less likely to deliver preterm compared with the ACOG group (aRR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93), but differences in SGA were not significant (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 0.84-2.03).
CONCLUSION: Pregnant patients with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension in the first trimester had higher rates of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and SGA neonates compared with normotensive women. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were numerically lower in the Stage I ACC-AHA group compared with the ACOG group, but these comparisons only reached statistical significance for preterm birth. Optimal pregnancy management for first trimester Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension requires active study. KEY POINTS: · Women with first trimester American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) Stage I hypertension were more likely to develop preeclampsia, deliver preterm, and deliver a small-for-gestational age neonate than normotensive women.. · Women with first trimester American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) hypertension (consistent with stage II ACC-AHA hypertension) had the highest numeric rate of adverse outcomes; however, compared with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension, there was only statistically significant difference for preterm delivery.. · The risk profile for pregnant women with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension and women with hypertension by conventional ACOG criteria may be more similar than previously understood.. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32446257      PMCID: PMC8923636          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  30 in total

1.  Prepregnancy cardiometabolic and inflammatory risk factors and subsequent risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Authors:  Monique M Hedderson; Jeanne A Darbinian; Sneha B Sridhar; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia with endothelial dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Gilbert; Michael J Ryan; Babbette B LaMarca; Mona Sedeek; Sydney R Murphy; Joey P Granger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Blood pressure tracking during pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertensive disorders: the Generation R Study.

Authors:  Romy Gaillard; Rachel Bakker; Sten P Willemsen; Albert Hofman; Eric A P Steegers; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  High normal blood pressure in early pregnancy also contribute to early onset preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia.

Authors:  Dian He; Shaowen Wu; Haiping Zhao; Zihe Zheng; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.749

6.  Prediction of preeclampsia utilizing the first trimester screening examination.

Authors:  Ahmet A Baschat; Laurence S Magder; Lauren E Doyle; Robert O Atlas; Chuka B Jenkins; Miriam G Blitzer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Prehypertension in Early Pregnancy: What is the Significance?

Authors:  Jonathan Y Rosner; Megan Gutierrez; Margaret Dziadosz; Amelie Pham; Terri-Ann Bennett; Cara Dolin; Allyson Herbst; Sarah Lee; Ashley S Roman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Blood pressure trajectory and category and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Alisse Hauspurg; Samuel Parry; Brian M Mercer; William Grobman; Tamera Hatfield; Robert M Silver; Corette B Parker; David M Haas; Jay D Iams; George R Saade; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Hyagriv Simhan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Maternal blood pressures during pregnancy and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age neonate.

Authors:  Dana M Block-Abraham; Dasha Adamovich; Ozhan M Turan; Lauren E Doyle; Miriam G Blitzer; Ahmet A Baschat
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.108

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Focus on today's evidence while keeping an eye on the future: lessons derived from hypertension in women.

Authors:  Gloria Valdés
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Prevalence of Hypertension Among Pregnant Women When Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines and Association With Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.

Authors:  Natalie A Bello; Hui Zhou; T Craig Cheetham; Eliza Miller; Darios T Getahun; Michael J Fassett; Kristi Reynolds
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in a Military Hospital Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Jimi Francis; Karla Waller; Amber Wilson; Darby Dickton
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 4.  Interconception Care for Primary Care Providers: Consensus Recommendations on Preconception and Postpartum Management of Reproductive-Age Patients With Medical Comorbidities.

Authors:  S Michelle Ogunwole; Xiaolei Chen; Srilakshmi Mitta; Anum Minhas; Garima Sharma; Sammy Zakaria; Arthur Jason Vaught; Stephanie M Toth-Manikowski; Graeme Smith
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.